Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-29-2014, 09:39 PM   #61
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

If I was a citizen of Glendale (glendalian, glennenite?), which I am not, I would be super browned off that a load of my tax money was poured into this team and now they belong to the state....eff that noise!!
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
Northendzone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2014, 11:41 PM   #62
saskflames69
#1 Goaltender
 
saskflames69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Arizona Iced Teas
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
If ever there was an oilering
Connor Zary will win the Hart Trophy in 2027.
saskflames69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 12:28 AM   #63
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Dave Tippett is a great coach. His teams play well.

Dave Tippett's style is boring as ####. If I was mildly interested in hockey because 'hey, nothing else to do let's check out a hockey game' and cruised on down and witnessed the rape and atrocity that is Dave Tippett hockey, you bet your ass I would never return.

The NHL is for entertainment for the fans. And while winning is fun... in a place like Phoenix, you need to not #### all over the game while you present it.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 12:30 AM   #64
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

And further I like NHL hockey and am a Canadian and I play hockey, grew up with it, it's in my blood yadda yadda yadda.

But they'd have to pay me to be a Coyotes season ticket holder and watch that crap for 41 times a year. Good lord is it just awful.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 09:23 AM   #65
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Dave Tippett is a great coach. His teams play well.

Dave Tippett's style is boring as ####. If I was mildly interested in hockey because 'hey, nothing else to do let's check out a hockey game' and cruised on down and witnessed the rape and atrocity that is Dave Tippett hockey, you bet your ass I would never return.

The NHL is for entertainment for the fans. And while winning is fun... in a place like Phoenix, you need to not #### all over the game while you present it.
I don't think the casual or new fan in Arizona appreciates the difference between boring and exciting hockey. If the team wins, they are probably entertained.

A boring hockey game live is still more exciting than basketball or baseball.

Last edited by troutman; 01-30-2014 at 09:31 AM.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 11:41 AM   #66
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
And further I like NHL hockey and am a Canadian and I play hockey, grew up with it, it's in my blood yadda yadda yadda.

But they'd have to pay me to be a Coyotes season ticket holder and watch that crap for 41 times a year. Good lord is it just awful.
Did you enjoy watching The Flames in the year 2003/2004? what an exciting brand that was.
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 12:09 PM   #67
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

^ And yet they sold out the building every night. The Coyotes are in pretty much the same scenario and have to give away many tickets to have a building 65% full. I know you're committed and thats great, but every single piece of available evidence suggests the Coyotes are destined to fail, or be a massive money loser for whoever owns them.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 12:42 PM   #68
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

I hate Coyotes most of all thanks to their brand of hockey. I agree with the couple posters above. It drives me mad because they suck all the fun out of games consistently. Especially games in their building.

Not to mention their incredible luck with scoring the most garbage goals that just make you throw up your hands in disbelief. Goals that wouldn't happen any other blue moon with any other team, and they're often game breakers. Sharp angle goals, goals that bounce off 2-3 players. It's just absolute garbage. Then they go to the 4 and 1, Smith locks it down and it's just waves on rocks for the rest of the game while Coyotes fans cheer on about the fact that their ahead, yet not noticing the significant drop in watchability of the game at that point. The rest of the game is an automatic cycle of skating around, rushes being broken up, and nothing actually happening. It's maddening.

#### the Coyotes, indeed.

Last edited by djsFlames; 01-30-2014 at 12:46 PM.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 12:43 PM   #69
Reaper
Franchise Player
 
Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
Exp:
Default Coyotes to Change Franchise Name

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouw N Arrow View Post
Wow. A few folks need a life
[IMG]Let the Butthurt flow through you...
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.

Last edited by Reaper; 01-30-2014 at 05:24 PM.
Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 01:01 PM   #70
CaramonLS
Retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouw N Arrow View Post
Did you enjoy watching The Flames in the year 2003/2004? what an exciting brand that was.
They worked hard, they played extremely physical, and punched people in the face when they were losing.

What wasn't to like about the 03/04 Flames?
CaramonLS is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CaramonLS For This Useful Post:
Old 01-30-2014, 01:27 PM   #71
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis View Post
^ And yet they sold out the building every night. The Coyotes are in pretty much the same scenario and have to give away many tickets to have a building 65% full. I know you're committed and thats great, but every single piece of available evidence suggests the Coyotes are destined to fail, or be a massive money loser for whoever owns them.
The 03-04 Flames? Actually, they didn't sell out the building every night. By the end they did, but the early part of the season was probably the lowest point in franchise history. I remember not even getting 17k for a game against Edmonton. Only to be expected since the season started with more of the same.

The important thing for the Coyotes owners is the escape clause. I think we'll see by the start of year 3 (2015-16) whether the team really is "here to stay". No turnaround by then, and the owners will likely be closing in on the magic figure of losses to relocate after five years.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 02:03 PM   #72
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

I have the feeling things are going so bad for the owners and Glendale, that they both will be prepared to tear up the agreement and walk away before 5 years are up.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 02:16 PM   #73
Cleveland Steam Whistle
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

I hope so, they need to move that shizzle elsewhere!
Cleveland Steam Whistle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 02:31 PM   #74
Tyler
Franchise Player
 
Tyler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

The Coyotes owners bought the team to flip. Bettman just needed a group to eat $50M in losses before they could flip the thing and make $100M when they're sold to Seattle or Quebec
Tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 02:36 PM   #75
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

No they didn't. They bought the team to eat the losses so they could move then franchise. No ownership is going to just eat a bowl of #### for 5 years or $50 mil in losses because Bettman needs to save face.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 04:43 PM   #76
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Well, if things don't change, the losses will be well more than $50 million. The escape clause, iirc, is that the lease can be voided after five years if losses exceed $50 million. They could surpass that within two seasons if the revenues don't improve, but will still have to eat three more losing seasons.

I think plan A for RSE is to turn things around in Phoenix. That has always been a long shot, so Plan B is relocation. That is their hedge against losses. Move the team to the Golden Horseshoe and the immediate increase in value would cover most or all of even the most extreme losses in Arizona.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 04:48 PM   #77
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

No, you're both wrong. They bought the team with the hope that with stable ownership, they can make it work in Phoenix. Of course being business men they have an out and if they can last they may come out okay by moving or flipping. They're finding out that stable ownership isn't the answer either but they did try to protect themselves by borrowing $80M from the NHL and $120M from Fortress.

Here's how they can leave early.

Quote:
Gosbee and his partners have an escape clause from their lease after five years or a cumulative $50-million in losses. At the same time, they do not have to pay the principal on the NHL loan until five years has passed. That just happens to be the time period when arenas in Seattle, Quebec City and perhaps Las Vegas will be ready.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sport...ticle13130564/
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
Old 01-30-2014, 04:54 PM   #78
Brannigans Law
First Line Centre
 
Brannigans Law's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

hold on a second, this is pretty important news. they can leave BEFORE 5 years is up if they have 50 million in losses??

this is really exciting stuff. we could have the nords within 3 years!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck2 View Post
Well, deal with it. I wasn't cheering for Canada either way. Nothing worse than arrogant Canadian fans. They'd be lucky to finish 4th. Quote me on that. They have a bad team and that is why I won't be cheering for them.
Brannigans Law is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 05:31 PM   #79
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

In any case the NHL looks to take a haircut to the tune of $104M after losing the lawsuit against Moyes.

Quote:
Gosbee and LeBlanc raised $250-million to buy the Coyotes. But they have little skin in the game, as they say, since $205-million of that is borrowed money. Fortress Investment Group, which lends money to distressed businesses at healthy interest rates, provided $120-million with the NHL chipping in $85-million.
Even better for Gosbee and LeBlanc, they do not have to make any payments on the principal of the NHL loan for five years. This just happens to be when their escape clause from Jobing.com Arena in suburban Glendale kicks in, if they can also show a total of $50-million in losses.
Here he contradicts with the word "also" but later says

Quote:
Then again, in five years or even sooner if the magic number of $50-million is reached, LeBlanc and Gosbee could sell the Coyotes to someone in, say Seattle or Las Vegas, for a big whack of cash and everyone goes home happy. Well, everyone except some fans in Arizona.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sport...ticle14806679/

Some confusion but all in all a big mess.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2014, 05:41 PM   #80
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Well, the league will make that money back through a relocation fee. Especially if, say Bell and Rogers decide they can't play nice together as Maple Leafs owners and one company gives up their stake in exchange for a free relocation into the Toronto market for the other.

If the Coyotes can't figure out how to draw fans in the next couple seasons, it is Glendale that will be left holding the bag. Everyone else breaks even or turns a profit.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:06 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy