Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-26-2014, 08:41 PM   #301
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MissTeeks View Post
“@ShaneOBrien55: A lot of good guys in that dressing room in Calgary.. All the best boys.”
Looks like I judged his character wrong. Good on him.
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 08:55 PM   #302
Zulu29
Franchise Player
 
Zulu29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kelowna
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Original FFIV View Post
Yeah, I overreacted and I'll own it. I look at it like this. Moves should be made to improve the team and I fail to see how this move improves the team. Breen looked like a slow pylon the times he's played yet we still have to see what he can do. It's only because he's the one player from the Sutter era that was brought in unsigned and showed some promise but to date hasn't been able to put it together at the NHL level. I get that they want to see what he can do but who sits in the top six to give him ice time? I don't think he is an improvement on O'Brien and SOB is not the major reason why we suck. People bitch and moan about a dufus for dufus trade but this is a dufus for dufus call up/demotion.

I guess all it would have taken is a relesse stating SOB is assigned to Abby and a call up is pending and my overreaction would have been less. Yeah, I spend too much time on this site and twitter awaiting breaking roster news but given the state of the team, that's all we have is the promise of a better tomorrow and tomorrow can't come soon enough.
I agree with you, Breen has not looked great but he hasn't been much worse than O'Brien. I feel bad for the guy and I hope he lands NHL employment soon, but do t forget, Burke is still pretty new to this team and wants to see what he has on the farm. Don't be surprised if Breen is moved in a package deal soon.

I'd love to be a fly on the wall in Burkes office just like everyone else here but I settle for speculating or reading speculation. At the end of the day it's all you, me and damn near everyone else here can do. No hard feelings, I was overly dickish in my response to you.

Let's just hope there's some good trade news soon!
Zulu29 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zulu29 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2014, 08:56 PM   #303
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
Wow, pretty candid.

What can SOB fetch you? A fourth? Or is that too optimistic?
Too optimistic. The only likely way to move him is a garbage for garbage deal or throw him in a bigger deal. It's going to be very difficult to move him this offseason and the team will probably be faced with buying him out or bringing him back to training camp next season.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 09:06 PM   #304
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Too optimistic. The only likely way to move him is a garbage for garbage deal or throw him in a bigger deal. It's going to be very difficult to move him this offseason and the team will probably be faced with buying him out or bringing him back to training camp next season.
Sigh... Feaster.

Sign Sarich to a nearly unreadable contract when you should have let him walk.

Then trade him for an even worse player. Tanguay + Sarich for SOB and Gagliardi was highway robbery!
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 09:06 PM   #305
Bandwagon In Flames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Original FFIV View Post
Yeah, I overreacted and I'll own it. I look at it like this. Moves should be made to improve the team and I fail to see how this move improves the team. Breen looked like a slow pylon the times he's played yet we still have to see what he can do. It's only because he's the one player from the Sutter era that was brought in unsigned and showed some promise but to date hasn't been able to put it together at the NHL level. I get that they want to see what he can do but who sits in the top six to give him ice time? I don't think he is an improvement on O'Brien and SOB is not the major reason why we suck. People bitch and moan about a dufus for dufus trade but this is a dufus for dufus call up/demotion.

I guess all it would have taken is a relesse stating SOB is assigned to Abby and a call up is pending and my overreaction would have been less. Yeah, I spend too much time on this site and twitter awaiting breaking roster news but given the state of the team, that's all we have is the promise of a better tomorrow and tomorrow can't come soon enough.

I agree that moves should be made to improve this team, but we should be looking to improve the future of this team. It's obvious O'Brien isn't in this teams future plans and he most definitely isn't needed as a positive veteran presence in our lineup moving forward.

Breen was with the flames briefly to start the year and he was told what facets of his game need to improve on in order to become an NHLer. This showing will see if there's been improvements and what his future role is with the club.

First people want to see what our prospects can do in the NHL and then they freak out when a veterans position is being taken by a younger player. We're in a rebuild everyone, get used to some of our established veterans getting demoted or traded for future assets.

I for one am excited to see Breen's progression as I know he improved leaps and bounds last year and hope more of the same has happened this year.
Bandwagon In Flames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Bandwagon In Flames For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2014, 09:09 PM   #306
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

I think he has some value if as Burke says we keep some of his salary. He may even be worth more now that he's cleared waivers. Some playoff bound team may want to have him available as an 8th defenceman, safely down on the farm.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2014, 09:42 PM   #307
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
Sigh... Feaster.

Sign Sarich to a nearly unreadable contract when you should have let him walk.

Then trade him for an even worse player. Tanguay + Sarich for SOB and Gagliardi was highway robbery!

Sarich at 2 million is a pretty fair contract. Colorado is getting more than that out of him this season. He is on pace for better than his career averages in points and is still playing a stand up physical game.

The problem wasn't sarich's contract, it was the way Hartley used him to kill any value he had. Colorado would have zero problems trading Sarich tomorrow if they wanted to, but I think they are quite happy to have a guy like him on their blueline as they head into the playoffs.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to killer_carlson For This Useful Post:
Old 01-26-2014, 11:18 PM   #308
macrov
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Within 24 hours you'll have all your thanks available again.
Nom nom nom
macrov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 11:21 PM   #309
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Well at least Tanguay would have had more value than D. Jones.. And Sarich plays way better D than SOB. I hated the trade from the start. I realize that these were just bad contracts trading bad contracts, but I think Tanguay would have actually produced more points than what D. Jones did.

Overall, I think the trade was horrible. D Jones' contract is worse than Tanguay's, and I thought Sarich seemed better than SOB.We could have traded the sulky Tanguay at the deadline. SOB is a fail, he needed to fight more and show more aggression. Now all we are using them for is the keep the cap good. The cap problem should be the least of our worries.. We can sign free agents and overpay them easily.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2014, 11:24 PM   #310
OzSome
Franchise Player
 
OzSome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

I hope Breen does the Paul Byron turnaround. Breen early in the season does not look like an NHL-ready defenseman and I thought he needs more seasoning in the AHL. Byron doesn't look like an NHLers either last season and early in the season but he was excellent after his last call-up. He uses his speed and was involved in a lot of plays.. i guess confidence does that to a player. So i am hoping Breen confidence is so much better this time around and also hope he is faster and try to use his strength to his advantage. He is big. Good luck on Breen.

As for SOB. I didn't think he was that bad. I thought he was playing ok especially for the minutes he's been playing. Only thing I noticed was he's not physical enough I guess.
OzSome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2014, 05:29 AM   #311
IamNotKenKing
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Well at least Tanguay would have had more value than D. Jones.. And Sarich plays way better D than SOB. I hated the trade from the start. I realize that these were just bad contracts trading bad contracts, but I think Tanguay would have actually produced more points than what D. Jones did.

Overall, I think the trade was horrible. D Jones' contract is worse than Tanguay's, and I thought Sarich seemed better than SOB.We could have traded the sulky Tanguay at the deadline. SOB is a fail, he needed to fight more and show more aggression. Now all we are using them for is the keep the cap good. The cap problem should be the least of our worries.. We can sign free agents and overpay them easily.
There is so much wrong with this logic. If we overpay FAs, then we're in the same position.
I don't have the numbers, but I think D. Jones produces more than Tanguay.
No guarantee we could have gotten anything else or different for Tanguay.
IamNotKenKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2014, 06:43 AM   #312
formulate
Scoring Winger
 
formulate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: In the now
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotKenKing View Post
There is so much wrong with this logic. If we overpay FAs, then we're in the same position.
I don't have the numbers, but I think D. Jones produces more than Tanguay.
No guarantee we could have gotten anything else or different for Tanguay.
I would maybe take a look at the numbers. The only year Jones has more points than Tanguay is this year, and he has played 25 more games to manage 5 extra points. That's just comparing year to year. If you match up their seasons at the same age (Tanguay being 5 years older):

26yrs: Jones (2010-11); 27-18-45 in 70 games. Tanguay (05-06); 29-49-78 in 71 games.
27yrs: Jones (2011-12); 20-17-37 in 72 games. Tanguay (06-07); 22-59-81 in 81 games.
And those are Jones' two best years.

Jones does bring size and relative youth to the team, but is most certainly worth less in terms of trade value.
formulate is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to formulate For This Useful Post:
Old 01-27-2014, 06:44 AM   #313
FBI
Franchise Player
 
FBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
Sigh... Feaster.

Sign Sarich to a nearly unreadablecontract when you should have let him walk.

Then trade him for an even worse player. Tanguay + Sarich for SOB and Gagliardiwas highway robbery!
you mean Jones?
__________________
FBI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2014, 07:17 AM   #314
IamNotKenKing
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by formulate View Post
I would maybe take a look at the numbers. The only year Jones has more points than Tanguay is this year, and he has played 25 more games to manage 5 extra points. That's just comparing year to year. If you match up their seasons at the same age (Tanguay being 5 years older):

26yrs: Jones (2010-11); 27-18-45 in 70 games. Tanguay (05-06); 29-49-78 in 71 games.
27yrs: Jones (2011-12); 20-17-37 in 72 games. Tanguay (06-07); 22-59-81 in 81 games.
And those are Jones' two best years.

Jones does bring size and relative youth to the team, but is most certainly worth less in terms of trade value.
Thanks for the info. (seriously) but we didn't trade 2005 Tanguay for Jones, we traded 2013 Tanguay for Jones, so, in my opinion, the comparable should be current numbers. The only way to say what each is worth comparably is if they were each traded now, and see what they receive.
IamNotKenKing is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to IamNotKenKing For This Useful Post:
Old 01-27-2014, 07:37 AM   #315
formulate
Scoring Winger
 
formulate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: In the now
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamNotKenKing View Post
Thanks for the info. (seriously) but we didn't trade 2005 Tanguay for Jones, we traded 2013 Tanguay for Jones, so, in my opinion, the comparable should be current numbers. The only way to say what each is worth comparably is if they were each traded now, and see what they receive.
This is absolutely true. I guess I put that in there to illustrate just how much better of a player Tanguay is/was. The fact remains that Jones is still being consistently outproduced by Tanguay. I get that Tanguay mailed it in ('pouted') after Iginla left, but that shouldn't have reduced his value to the rest of the league. At least, not to the point where he was swapped for a buyout candidate.
formulate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2014, 07:41 AM   #316
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by formulate View Post
This is absolutely true. I guess I put that in there to illustrate just how much better of a player Tanguay is/was. The fact remains that Jones is still being consistently outproduced by Tanguay. I get that Tanguay mailed it in ('pouted') after Iginla left, but that shouldn't have reduced his value to the rest of the league. At least, not to the point where he was swapped for a buyout candidate.
Hard to compare, Tanguay has had a really tough season. Basically been hurt for most of it. Playing 14 games and generating 3 goals.
flambers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2014, 08:09 AM   #317
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flambers View Post
Hard to compare, Tanguay has had a really tough season. Basically been hurt for most of it. Playing 14 games and generating 3 goals.
Extended absence due to knee injury, Tanguay played for the first time since November and got an assist.

10 points in 14 compared to 15 points in 39. That actually seems pretty easy to compare.
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2014, 08:24 AM   #318
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
Extended absence due to knee injury, Tanguay played for the first time since November and got an assist.

10 points in 14 compared to 15 points in 39. That actually seems pretty easy to compare.
Not to defend the move but from Feaster's point of view both Sarich and Tanguay will likely be retired or at the end of the line by the time the Flames are ready to compete again.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2014, 08:35 AM   #319
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
Extended absence due to knee injury, Tanguay played for the first time since November and got an assist.

10 points in 14 compared to 15 points in 39. That actually seems pretty easy to compare.
Tanguay is always playing with Landesog (5.5M 14 goals 38 pts) and Statsnsy (6.6 M 14 goals 37 pts)

D.Jones not nearly having the same consistenent linemates as Tanguay but his most common line mates are Stajan ( 3.1 M 8 goals 19 pts) Backlund 1.5M 9 goals 21 pts and Bouma .5 M 4 goals 10 pts)

All 3 of David Jones linemates are not making as much as either one of Tanguays linemates.

We all have a pretty good idea how Tanguay would be playing if he was asked to play on a line with Backlund and Bouma as David Jones has been asked.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2014, 08:42 AM   #320
formulate
Scoring Winger
 
formulate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: In the now
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Tanguay is always playing with Landesog (5.5M 14 goals 38 pts) and Statsnsy (6.6 M 14 goals 37 pts)

D.Jones not nearly having the same consistenent linemates as Tanguay but his most common line mates are Stajan ( 3.1 M 8 goals 19 pts) Backlund 1.5M 9 goals 21 pts and Bouma .5 M 4 goals 10 pts)

All 3 of David Jones linemates are not making as much as either one of Tanguays linemates.

We all have a pretty good idea how Tanguay would be playing if he was asked to play on a line with Backlund and Bouma as David Jones has been asked.
Can't really argue this point, but Tanguay is a playmaker who has the ability to create offense. I'd be willing to bet Bouma would have a few more goals with Tanguay as a linemate. I'd also be willing to bet that Tanguay (0.82 career ppg, 0.46 ppg in his worst season, 0.68 ppg last year) would have more than Jones' 15 points (0.38 ppg). Of course, there's no way of knowing for sure, I don't know how to get to the other timelines
formulate is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:58 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy