Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-25-2014, 01:17 PM   #41
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

The one thing I didn't like about the trade was 2yrs on O'Brien's contract.

Tanguay and Sarich wanted out so trading them was for the best.

Jones and Tanguay's contracts were essentially a wash. Tanguay was getting older and I knew injury would likely plague him moving forward so getting a younger, bigger Jones wasn't terrible. He is serviceable.

But inheriting O'Brien's 2 years compared to Sarich's one I figured was a mistake.

Hopefully he is claimed. But I doubt it.
SeanCharles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 01:18 PM   #42
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodlad View Post
Ironically the player that's had the biggest impact out of that deal is Sarich.
Which most of us could have predicted when it happened. Sarich has always been more useful than the Flames acted.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”

Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2014, 01:19 PM   #43
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drury18 View Post
If Klesla, whose actually proven he can play a good shut down defence game on more then one occasion, is passed over at that price then O'Brien doesn't stand a chance.

Better defence have passed through. So hopefully Burke has a trade planned otherwise we will have a $2M player in Abbotsford.
I don't think they will send him down.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 01:20 PM   #44
trackercowe
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

Can't we just use a compliance buyout on him? Might as well, if they aren't intending on using it on someone else.
trackercowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 01:20 PM   #45
Drury18
Franchise Player
 
Drury18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Exp:
Default

I think Burke would. I think he would send him down and bring up Billins because he can just to prove a point.
Drury18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 01:24 PM   #46
Buck Murdock
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Buck Murdock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

I'd rather have Sarich back.
Buck Murdock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 01:25 PM   #47
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Can't we go back and trade Tanguay and Sarich for 7th round draft picks?
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 01:26 PM   #48
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

I'm going to read into this a bit.

Detroit has reportedly shown interest in Cammy. Samuelsson makes almost exactly half of what Cammy makes but has a NTC and unlikely to waive it to come here. We claim Samuelsson, take 1/2 of Cammy's salary and trade him to Detroit for a first and a prospect so Detroit makes their cap work.

O'Brien will presumably clear waivers. Detroit has a truculent winger in the minors making almost the same amount as O'Brien (Tootoo). If O'Brien clears we deal him to Detroit who need D depth for Tootoo.
The Original FFIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 01:29 PM   #49
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
Good riddance? I hate to break it to CP, but nobody is claiming this guy and the flames will still have him next year.

To think, i've seen posts in the last couple of weeks saying that they thought SOB was alright. Glad management is smarter then them.
Yeah he's likely going to be Flames property until the end of the deal as no team will take him. Personally I would like to see the Flames buy him and D. Jones out and use the cap savings to bring in a pricey free agent that can play and contribute. Hard to imagine the owners having an appetite for buyouts given the Flames are pretty well breaking even now and will probably looking at their sellout streak ending in the next few years.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 01:36 PM   #50
Ring of Fire
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Ring of Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Exp:
Default

This isn't surprising. Acquiring O'Brien was all Feaster. He gave up a first rounder to Anaheim to get O'Brien when he was in Tampa. Picking up O'Brien in the Tanguay trade was picking a bad contract. In the Canucks game when we were down to 4 dmen, O'Brien didn't even play 20 min so it seems pretty clear Hartley doesn't like him either.
Ring of Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 01:37 PM   #51
Mike F
Franchise Player
 
Mike F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Djibouti
Exp:
Default

Strikes me as an overreaction to a bad night.

IMO, O'Brien hasn't been as physical as I expected, but otherwise has been very serviceable as a bottom pairing defenseman.

Going into last game he'd been a -7, which isn't bad considering how little offense he brings and the team has overall. He brought less stupidity and bad penalties than I expected, and did (again) a serviceable job of providing 5 or 6 shifts per period where he didn't hurt the team and spelled the top 4.

Not sure who Burke sees as more competent to step in right now.
Mike F is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mike F For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2014, 01:38 PM   #52
taffeyb
Crash and Bang Winger
 
taffeyb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Yeah he's likely going to be Flames property until the end of the deal as no team will take him. Personally I would like to see the Flames buy him and D. Jones out and use the cap savings to bring in a pricey free agent that can play and contribute. Hard to imagine the owners having an appetite for buyouts given the Flames are pretty well breaking even now and will probably looking at their sellout streak ending in the next few years.
Sellout streak? You see all of the empty seats in the Dome? Plus the fact that you can still get tickets on ticketmaster for most games. It's a sell out streak only on paper...Edmonton has a similar issue with their supposed sellout streak...their fans are calling them on it...
taffeyb is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to taffeyb For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2014, 01:39 PM   #53
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

This could be to make room on the roster for another player

But it also potentially helps their cap situation to send him down (assuming he is still down there next year as well). He would still count against the cap, well part of his salary anyway, and they are really going to have a very tough time getting to the floor.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 01:41 PM   #54
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trackercowe View Post
Can't we just use a compliance buyout on him? Might as well, if they aren't intending on using it on someone else.
If they decide to buy him out they might as well use a regular buyout. We could use the cap hit.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 01:44 PM   #55
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Yeah he's likely going to be Flames property until the end of the deal as no team will take him. Personally I would like to see the Flames buy him and D. Jones out and use the cap savings to bring in a pricey free agent that can play and contribute. Hard to imagine the owners having an appetite for buyouts given the Flames are pretty well breaking even now and will probably looking at their sellout streak ending in the next few years.
Assuming they don't re-sign Cammalleri, they are looking at having to throw as much as $10m at free agents next year already.

If they bought out Jones and O'Brien, they would have to find something like $15m in free agent takers. That would require throwing completely stupid money around.

By the way, the Flames were better than breaking even when they were spending to the cap. I would think they are very profitable now - like the Oilers were in 2011.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 01:50 PM   #56
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Assuming they don't re-sign Cammalleri, they are looking at having to throw as much as $10m at free agents next year already.

If they bought out Jones and O'Brien, they would have to find something like $15m in free agent takers. That would require throwing completely stupid money around.

By the way, the Flames were better than breaking even when they were spending to the cap. I would think they are very profitable now - like the Oilers were in 2011.
Don't have to throw stupid money around, just get guys on stupid deals that teams are wanting to get rid of and hope you can get a pick or two as compensation. Too much panic on this board about hitting the floor.
The Original FFIV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Original FFIV For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2014, 01:56 PM   #57
Freeway
Franchise Player
 
Freeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Cammalleri isn't ready yet. Glencross isn't nearly ready yet.

Street, Byron and Blair Jones would all require waivers to head down.
__________________
PHWA Member // Managing Editor @ FlamesNation // Author of "On The Clock: Behind The Scenes with the Calgary Flames at the NHL Draft" // Twitter

"Does a great job covering the Flames" - Elliotte Friedman
Freeway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2014, 01:57 PM   #58
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

probably has something to do with O'Brien coming back overweight after the last olympic break :P

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/obrien-apology/

Quote:
"I guess I slipped up a little bit with that over the Olympic break and that’s not very professional. Obviously they weren’t too happy about it."
keep him playing and away from temptation...
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2014, 02:01 PM   #59
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeway View Post
Cammalleri isn't ready yet. Glencross isn't nearly ready yet.

Street, Byron and Blair Jones would all require waivers to head down.

I don't get the bolded part? I think all 3 would clear waivers.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2014, 02:03 PM   #60
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
probably has something to do with O'Brien coming back overweight after the last olympic break :P

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/obrien-apology/



keep him playing and away from temptation...

That was 4 years ago. What does that have to do with now?
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:36 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy