Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-09-2014, 09:03 AM   #21
Hack&Lube
Atomic Nerd
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Bring back Electric Avenue?
Hack&Lube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 09:07 AM   #22
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

I used to recently live on one of these streets. I was both a pedestrian and a driver on both 11th and 12th many hundreds of times. I don't see how two-way improves anything. If you're looking for a quiet street to walk east-west that's what 13th avenue achieves. If you're using the businesses located on 11th or 12th avenues as a driver or pedestrian I'm not sure how it makes a difference. I never felt unsafe due to "speeding" traffic. At least there is no congestion blocking crosswalks, and no worry of traffic speeding in 2 directions.

11th Ave east of 4th street and 12th Ave west of 5th street could do with crosswalk bulbs at each parking lane to shorten crosswalk distances to 2 lanes instead of 4. Traffic on east 11th, and west 12th is rarely busy enough to need 3-4 lanes. You'd leave it as is on the remainder of the road where traffic accumulates so you can keep the rush hour no parking lanes in the busier areas.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 09:13 AM   #23
Table 5
Franchise Player
 
Table 5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cam_wmh View Post
Regardless if they keep 11th & 12, one way, I think parking should be removed permanently, on one side of both roads (north side?).
I live on west side of 12th, so get to experience rush hour anyway. It gets loud every morning, but I that's the price you pay for living on 12th.

However, I would really hate to see all the parking removed. It would make the street even more of a busy thoroughfare where nobody ever walks down. There's a school here, a new park, some new condos...I think it would be nice to have it be a little more pedestrian friendly, even if it remains as is.

I understand why 12th and 11th are the way they are, and I'm not sure turning them into 2 way would be necessary, but I definitely would prefer for them not to turn up what the already are.
Table 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 09:29 AM   #24
FlamesKickAss
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

dumb idea. this was part of his campaign platform apparently though.
FlamesKickAss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 09:40 AM   #25
Bigtime
Franchise Player
 
Bigtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Would this have to go to a vote at council?
Bigtime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 09:40 AM   #26
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

We gonna rock down to Electric Avenue
And then we'll take it higher
Oh we gonna rock down to Electric Avenue
And then we'll take it higher
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to troutman For This Useful Post:
Old 01-09-2014, 09:48 AM   #27
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

oops
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%

Last edited by mykalberta; 01-09-2014 at 09:52 AM.
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 09:52 AM   #28
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

When the City decides on these sorts of things. What is the normal weighting of local R&C concerns vs local R&C ie commuters?

From the Citys perspective I would think pedestrian focus would be its number one concern and not commuters.

From someone who only uses the roads and area very infrequently the current posted speed limit is exceeded by quite a large margin at least the times I have been around the area.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 09:56 AM   #29
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

I work nearby, and typically walk down 11th and/or 12th to get to client sites. I don't see how this would benefit anyone.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 10:01 AM   #30
East Coast Flame
Powerplay Quarterback
 
East Coast Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Live in Sunalta and I hate this idea. I almost always use 11th and 12th to get through downtown.
East Coast Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 10:16 AM   #31
Zarley
First Line Centre
 
Zarley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

This is what we get for electing a hipster.
Zarley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 10:35 AM   #32
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

How about we start with the simple stuff, like actually putting sidewalks in along 10th avenue?

I find it embarassing that right in the core of our city you have to result to walking along mud trails to get anywhere.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Bill Bumface For This Useful Post:
Old 01-09-2014, 10:51 AM   #33
Pagal4321
Franchise Player
 
Pagal4321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Why did people vote for Evan Wooley?!

*sigh*
Pagal4321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 10:55 AM   #34
CaramonLS
Retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pagal4321 View Post
Why did people vote for Evan Wooley?!

*sigh*
because John Mar
CaramonLS is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CaramonLS For This Useful Post:
Old 01-09-2014, 11:23 AM   #35
corporatejay
Franchise Player
 
corporatejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

Here's the thing with Evan Wooley......I think he generally means well and his goal is to increase street level "pedestrian traffic" on 11th and 12th. This may not be the way to get there, but at least now other ideas might come to the forefront.

The kid is pretty green, give him time, he has good ideas.
__________________
corporatejay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 11:32 AM   #36
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

The worst part of this idea is that if it is implemented it would include all of the other things Bunk mentions, Streetscaping, wide sidewalks, etc. Then it would be a success, not because of the 1/2way issue but because of all the other things that were added. Then it would be used as a blue print to remove one way streets. Instead just narrow up the lanes a little bit and people will drive slower, also add pedestrian islands at intersections to slow dow traffic as well. If traffic speed is the issue, address traffic speed not direction.

I find it interesting that the report Bunk quotes states "Buinesses feel that 2 way is better for business" rather than actaully study whether or not this is the case. I don't really care if someone feels its better. It either is better or isn't. I know I would perfer 10th ave to be 1 way around MEC just to make getting in and out of the parking lot easier.

In a lot of ways eliminating left turns make it easier to get in and out of businesses parking lots. And once you are an experienced one-way street user getting to a place on a 1 way street is quite easy.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post:
Old 01-09-2014, 03:01 PM   #37
cal_guy
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Exp:
Default

This study seems to show the benefits of two-way street that ban left turns over one-way streets.

http://www.uctc.net/access/41/access41_twoway.shtml
cal_guy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cal_guy For This Useful Post:
Old 01-09-2014, 03:07 PM   #38
MelBridgeman
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay View Post
Here's the thing with Evan Wooley......I think he generally means well and his goal is to increase street level "pedestrian traffic" on 11th and 12th. This may not be the way to get there, but at least now other ideas might come to the forefront.

The kid is pretty green, give him time, he has good ideas.
The good thing is that all of his ideas have happened in other cities - but what works in Vancouver may not work in Calgary - especially two streets downtown

And am all for what he is trying to do (ala kensington) but there are still large portions of 17th ave/4th street with dead space..I mean when a 7-11 closes down in the heart of the city...
MelBridgeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 04:22 PM   #39
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay View Post
Here's the thing with Evan Wooley......I think he generally means well and his goal is to increase street level "pedestrian traffic" on 11th and 12th. This may not be the way to get there, but at least now other ideas might come to the forefront.

The kid is pretty green, give him time, he has good ideas.
I don't know much about him, but this seems to indicate to me that he has good intentions and bad ideas.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2014, 06:58 PM   #40
cam_wmh
Franchise Player
 
cam_wmh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MelBridgeman View Post
I mean when a 7-11 closes down in the heart of the city...
I don't think that's related at all. Their corporate HQ, would not invest into that shop (among others), and staffing it was problematic.
You have two Macs stores within 5 blocks, and they do just fine, in less common areas.
cam_wmh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:59 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy