Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-30-2013, 07:19 PM   #81
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Badgers Nose View Post
Boston has a line with three centre. So what?

If you can play centre you can easily adapt to rw and lw.
Again the key phrase is for the price Toronto will be asking.

It isn't that Calgary has too many centers it is that they are deep enough that it doesn't make sense to deal Brodie from an area of weakness (defense) to get another center.

Sure most of the centers we have are bottom 6 guys but you look at the defense group now and especially going forward and without Brodie it is down right awful.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:20 PM   #82
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
true. age should be considered.

Brodie's upside is still unknown. By 27 he could be better than Russel ever was.....

anyway, just some speculation on my part.
Brodie is better Russell has ever been right now.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
Old 12-30-2013, 07:24 PM   #83
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
The bolded part is the reason why the flames will not be able to get him without a 1st or top prospect being involved. I agree with the poster that said Backlund + Sven would probably be close. We have seen what top 6 centers get in trade, and its not cheap. Even if you don't like Kadri's attitude, he will not get any less.

I think the Leafs are looking for players who can help now. not necessarily a first or prospect.

the only way the flames can make this deal (IMO) is with a combination of both. Cammalleri + Sven/Backlund. If the Flames offer that up and perhaps take some salary off the Leafs hands, something might get done.

Backlunds getting close to the age where we'll know what he is. in the next year or two we're going to find out whether he is closer to Frans Neilsen or Aaron Gavy.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:26 PM   #84
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Flames best bet would be to move the UFAs for assets then make a deal, more like a 3 team deal.

Something like Cammy to Vancouver for Tanev.

Then Tanev + Backlund + ? to Toronto for Kadri.

That type of deal would be the Flames best bet as Toronto likely looks for a similar age stay at home d-man and a downgrade at center in return for Kadri.

The value likely isn't there in the deal above but it is something like that the Leafs will be looking for IMO. Think about what Seguin got but less then that.
That's an interesting idea.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:29 PM   #85
MolsonInBothHands
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Just don't trade the first rounder or #23. Open to anything else that injects some skill that can stick at this level.
__________________
"Cammy just threw them in my locker & told me to hold on to them." - Giordano on the pencils from Iggy's stall.
MolsonInBothHands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:32 PM   #86
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
Brodie is better Russell has ever been right now.

eeesh.....well, I hope you're right because I am a Brodie fan, but from a statistical point of view, there is no comparison this year. More goals, more assists, better +/-, more shots on goal, more blocked shots, and Brodie has played more games.....Russel is blowing him out of the water. full stop.

Perhaps Russel is getting the easier assignments, but they have also been paired together this year.

It's a small sample size, but aside from age factoring in here, one player has outperformed the other so far this year.

Last edited by TOfan; 12-30-2013 at 07:35 PM.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:37 PM   #87
Crumpy-Gunt
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: 403
Exp:
Default

We wont get Kadri. I think it would be cool if we did get him as I enjoyed watching him play last year - but we need a RW / D with some size and skill way before we try getting a soft/skilled C with a potentially questionable attitude.

For what we'd have to give up - we have other organizational needs and weaknesses in our prospect pool to address way before we try getting Kadri.

I'd only take him if we fleece Toronto, which probably wont happen since Nonis was trained by Burke..
Crumpy-Gunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:42 PM   #88
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
eeesh.....well, I hope you're right because I am a Brodie fan, but from a statistical point of view, there is no comparison this year. More goals, more assists, better +/-, more shots on goal, more blocked shots, and Brodie has played more games.....Russel is blowing him out of the water. full stop.

Perhaps Russel is getting the easier assignments, but they have also been paired together this year.

It's a small sample size, but aside from age factoring in here, one player has outperformed the other so far this year.
Russell has been great, but he has also been getting easier assignments (not taking anything away from him).

However, Brodie is a better all around defenseman now, and he is only 23.

Since this is a trade value discussion, Brodie has substantially more trade value than Russell and there is no way Brodie would be 'thrown into' a trade the way that Russell might.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 08:00 PM   #89
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Russell has been great, but he has also been getting easier assignments (not taking anything away from him).

However, Brodie is a better all around defenseman now, and he is only 23.

Since this is a trade value discussion, Brodie has substantially more trade value than Russell and there is no way Brodie would be 'thrown into' a trade the way that Russell might.

oh, I agree. Brodie would have considerable more value, and that's why the Flames might be more compelled to trade Brodie. They would get more for him.

Regardless, I don't see the Flames trading Brodie. In this specific case, why would the Leafs want Brodie anyhow when they already have Gardiner and Riely as young puck moving D?
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 08:02 PM   #90
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Backlund + Wideman for Kadri + Liles. The Leafs get a pretty decent upgrade on D and get a young defensive center who could thrive under Carlyle. Flames get a player with higher potential in Kadri and a cap dump which the Flames could keep or use a compliance buyout on in the summer
I would prefer to have both. There are other assets you can move...

The best proposal ive seen is the Cammi+Butler or even Wideman for Kadri and Liles... That would make sense for both teams aside from TO needing a Centre.

At this point, aside from Stajan, Backlund is our BEST center. Like it or not. Yes, some guys may have more upside than Backs but even Monahan isn't as good as Backlund.

Geez... the guy isn't even 25 yet... I sure hope Monahan leads the league in scoring by 23 or the CP faithful will be calling him a dud too...
IgiTang is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to IgiTang For This Useful Post:
Old 12-30-2013, 08:18 PM   #91
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IgiTang View Post
I would prefer to have both. There are other assets you can move...

The best proposal ive seen is the Cammi+Butler or even Wideman for Kadri and Liles... That would make sense for both teams aside from TO needing a Centre.

At this point, aside from Stajan, Backlund is our BEST center. Like it or not. Yes, some guys may have more upside than Backs but even Monahan isn't as good as Backlund.

Geez... the guy isn't even 25 yet... I sure hope Monahan leads the league in scoring by 23 or the CP faithful will be calling him a dud too...
what?? two UFA's for Kadri?? on what planet does that make sense?

that's nonsense. Toronto wouldn't consider that for a second. Even if Cammalleri had three more years on his deal I would ask for more than a bottom pairing D-man who is about to become a UFA.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 08:33 PM   #92
FAN
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

I'm not a fan of Kadri. I'll take the chance and acquire him if the price is a steal, but I suspect the cost of acquiring him and the cost to re-signing him would be unattractive.
FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 08:35 PM   #93
d_phaneuf
Franchise Player
 
d_phaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

if you think Kadri can be a top line center you deal for him here

because that's what he is going to want to be paid after next season, I don't see Brian Burke viewing him as that, so I doubt the Flames have interest
d_phaneuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 08:38 PM   #94
OzSome
Franchise Player
 
OzSome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Time to break the curse of trading with the Leafs and hopefully fleece them in a trade for once.

Cammy ($2 million retained) + Butler + 2nd Round Pick for Kadri + Liles

Maybe Burke can bribe Nonis by stating how he got him two GM jobs in the league by bringing him in as AGM and then getting fired.
I don't really want the Flames trading for Kadri but so far this trade proposal I like the best except downgrade the draft pick from 2nd to 4th. I like Cammalleri but I don't think there is a future for him here and if he's not traded, he will sign with a team that have a chance to win the Cup next season. Liles is just a throwaway and will just give TO some cap room. If we trade for him, I hope Burkie will not give up any prospect.
OzSome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 08:51 PM   #95
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

Nazem "the dream" khadri.....my guess is that Burke will leave the country for some reason just as the trade talk really heats up.....
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
Northendzone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 09:08 PM   #96
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OzSome View Post
I like Cammalleri but I don't think there is a future for him here and if he's not traded, he will sign with a team that have a chance to win the Cup next season.
I suspect money/situation will be the biggest factor, he's only 31.

People thinking Cammy and Butler are going to get it done aren't being realistic. Toronto is going to want some quality back, not our spare parts.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jacks For This Useful Post:
Old 12-30-2013, 09:08 PM   #97
4oh3
Powerplay Quarterback
 
4oh3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Cammy stajan for gardiner and kadri


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Go Flames Go
4oh3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 09:18 PM   #98
Zulu29
Franchise Player
 
Zulu29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kelowna
Exp:
Default

It'll take an overpayment to get Kadri and we aren't in the position to overpay. Besides, he's not that far removed from lurking in the AHL because of poor play. I'd rather take the assets we are gonna move to shore up the D and RW.
Zulu29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 09:21 PM   #99
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

We should be looking at trading away players for assets not the other way around
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 09:33 PM   #100
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
We should be looking at trading away players for assets not the other way around
The guy just turned 23, he is a top 2 centre and has ppg potential. That is an asset IMO.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy