Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-30-2013, 06:48 PM   #61
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Flames can not afford Kadri.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 06:48 PM   #62
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 06:53 PM   #63
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
Flames can not afford Kadri.

huh? how so?
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 06:53 PM   #64
DOOM
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
Flames can not afford Kadri.
Yes we can, but it wouldn't make sense.
DOOM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DOOM For This Useful Post:
Old 12-30-2013, 06:57 PM   #65
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOOM View Post
Yes we can, but it wouldn't make sense.

what??

the Flames have one of the best cap situations in the league moving forward.

Affording Kadri isn't even a question at this point.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:00 PM   #66
Goodlad
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Goodlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Central CA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
what??

the Flames have one of the best cap situations in the league moving forward.

Affording Kadri isn't even a question at this point.
I'm pretty sure they're referring to the acquisition cost, not his salary.
Goodlad is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Goodlad For This Useful Post:
Old 12-30-2013, 07:01 PM   #67
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reign of Fire View Post
so we should trade all potential prospects and young players for guys that have proven to play in the NHL...why even show up at the draft, just keep trading draft picks. Rebuilds require patience, you don't have any if its already time to move on from Sven
Since when does trading for a 23 year old player mean that we now have to trade all potential prospects.

Going from Sven to Kadri likely does little to nothing in terms of the time frame of the rebuild and certainly doesn't mean the team has little patience.

Its not time to move on from Sven it would be using Sven to get an asset you think improves your team.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:02 PM   #68
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
not enough IMO.

sven is 2-3 years away from hitting his prime (and we don't even know what that is yet he could very well just be yet another kid who tore up jr and never made it) and russel is a UFA who could have been had for next to nothing less than a year ago.

In other words two question marks for a 23 year old top two C who is just entering his prime isn't going to cut it. Nonis should be fired for making that deal and Burke should be GM of the year.

Given what the Leafs need, I wouldn't even do Sven and Brodie for Kadri.
Neither would the Flames

Not super interested in Kadri, personally, but proposals are always fun. How about something like:

Cammalleri, Backlund, Russell (or a 2nd) for Kadri and Gardiner
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 12-30-2013, 07:03 PM   #69
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

It would be interesting if some sort of a deal could be centred around Cammy. Sign him for something like 4 years @ 6M and then package him at half salary with another player for Kadri. Depending on what player is added that could be a good deal for us. Leafs get Cammy, <insert player> and about 12M in cap relief (also gets us 3M closer to the floor for 4 years). The quality of player added could also drop if we were willing to take a cap dump back like Liles. By the time we are looking to contend all the dead money would be off our books and Kadri would still be in his prime.
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:03 PM   #70
DOOM
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
what??

the Flames have one of the best cap situations in the league moving forward.

Affording Kadri isn't even a question at this point.

I was assuming that he meant the Flames didn't have the assets to acquire him.
DOOM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:03 PM   #71
strombad
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

Whether or not we can afford Kadri is not a question even worth asking. If there is a will, there is a way. Trades happen all the time that are often incredibly lopsided, and Nonis isn't exactly a master of the craft. People stating we couldn't possibly afford it are wrong, simply because you don't know how certain teams value certain players.

For me, personally, if a trade can be worked out that doesn't cost us as much as a 1st and one of our top prospects, you do it. If you look at the supposed "depth" the Flames have at center, it's a whole lot of bottom 6 guys, anyone playing above the 3rd line would be great, but a bit of a long shot.

Kadri is a bonafide top 6 guy that is only 23, and would absolutely give the rebuild a push forward.

The only guy I wouldnt trade straight up for Kadri is Monahan. Everyone else is fair game.
strombad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:04 PM   #72
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

With Russell and Cammy being UFA's hard to see them being the main parts of any deal.

Way too much risk for the Leafs to end up with Backlund as only piece of that deal and that would be awful for them.

As TOfan said much more likely the Flames keep Russell as the Brodie replacement in this deal than TO wanting him in the deal.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:05 PM   #73
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DOOM View Post
I was assuming that he meant the Flames didn't have the assets to acquire him.
ah, I see.

you're probably right.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:10 PM   #74
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Neither would the Flames

Not super interested in Kadri, personally, but proposals are always fun. How about something like:

Cammalleri, Backlund, Russell (or a 2nd) for Kadri and Gardiner
I think the Flames should sign Russel and move Brodie. To my eye (and statistically), he has out performed Brodie this year.

that said, I would make that trade. The flames would be wise to sign Cammalleri to an extension then make the deal and take a 1st or former first from the Leafs as well. Certainly Burke knows who is in their system and has his favorites.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:12 PM   #75
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strombad View Post
Whether or not we can afford Kadri is not a question even worth asking. If there is a will, there is a way. Trades happen all the time that are often incredibly lopsided, and Nonis isn't exactly a master of the craft. People stating we couldn't possibly afford it are wrong, simply because you don't know how certain teams value certain players.

For me, personally, if a trade can be worked out that doesn't cost us as much as a 1st and one of our top prospects, you do it. If you look at the supposed "depth" the Flames have at center, it's a whole lot of bottom 6 guys, anyone playing above the 3rd line would be great, but a bit of a long shot.

Kadri is a bonafide top 6 guy that is only 23, and would absolutely give the rebuild a push forward.

The only guy I wouldnt trade straight up for Kadri is Monahan. Everyone else is fair game.
The bolded part is the reason why the flames will not be able to get him without a 1st or top prospect being involved. I agree with the poster that said Backlund + Sven would probably be close. We have seen what top 6 centers get in trade, and its not cheap. Even if you don't like Kadri's attitude, he will not get any less.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:12 PM   #76
Goodlad
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Goodlad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Central CA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
I think the Flames should sign Russel and move Brodie. To my eye, he has out performed Brodie this year.

that said, I would make that trade. The flames would be wise to sign Cammalleri to an extension then make the deal and take a 1st or former first from the Leafs as well. Certainly Burke knows who is in their system and has his favorites.
Yes, he has. However one player is a 5'10" 27yr old UFA, the other is a home-grown 6' 23 yr old. I like Russell, but if I had to choose between him and Brodie it would be a no-brainer.
Goodlad is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Goodlad For This Useful Post:
Old 12-30-2013, 07:13 PM   #77
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
With Monahan. Colborne, Backlund on the roster and Knight and potentially Granlund ont he farm hard to see a spot that Kadri would fit for the price that they are likely going to be asking.

I imagine they would want a defenseman of similar age/ability back and outside of Brodie who should go nowhere we don't have that available.
Boston has a line with three centre. So what?

If you can play centre you can easily adapt to rw and lw.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:15 PM   #78
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodlad View Post
Yes, he has. However one player is a 5'10" 27yr old UFA, the other is a home-grown 6' 23 yr old. I like Russell, but if I had to choose between him and Brodie it would be a no-brainer.
true. age should be considered.

Brodie's upside is still unknown. By 27 he could be better than Russel ever was.....

anyway, just some speculation on my part.
TOfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:16 PM   #79
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Flames best bet would be to move the UFAs for assets then make a deal, more like a 3 team deal.

Something like Cammy to Vancouver for Tanev.

Then Tanev + Backlund + ? to Toronto for Kadri.

That type of deal would be the Flames best bet as Toronto likely looks for a similar age stay at home d-man and a downgrade at center in return for Kadri.

The value likely isn't there in the deal above but it is something like that the Leafs will be looking for IMO. Think about what Seguin got but less then that.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 12-30-2013 at 07:20 PM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 07:18 PM   #80
strombad
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default Nazem Kadri on trade block

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
The bolded part is the reason why the flames will not be able to get him without a 1st or top prospect being involved. I agree with the poster that said Backlund + Sven would probably be close. We have seen what top 6 centers get in trade, and its not cheap. Even if you don't like Kadri's attitude, he will not get any less.

Eh, he still might be had for less, you never really know. He's not at Seguin's level (of talent or potential) so look at what he got and subtract.

(less than a 1st and a top prospect, Backlund + Bart is probably ballpark, but you could also go with Cammy and Sieloff, or something like that).
strombad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:27 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy