Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Other Sports: Football, Baseball, Local Hockey, Etc...
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-12-2006, 02:44 PM   #1
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default Whizzinator joins the Bombers!

Quote:
Running back Onterrio Smith, suspended last year for violating the NFL's substance abuse policy, signed a contract with the CFL's Winnipeg Blue Bombers on Friday.
If I was Charles Roberts I wouldn't be buying any green bananas.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2006, 02:52 PM   #2
Cheese
Franchise Player
 
Cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Exp:
Default

Welcome to the CRL....the Canadian Reefer League!

well I guess that opens the door further for a Dolphin in Argoland...although Smith woulda been better.
Cheese is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 03:59 PM   #3
Antithesis
Disenfranchised
 
Antithesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Exp:
Default

Does anyone else think this sends a bad message to fans about the CFL? That two drugged-out castoffs are somehow desirable (and will probably start)? Isn't it also kind of disrespectful toward the NFL at least with their suspension of Williams?
Antithesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 04:04 PM   #4
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antithesis
Does anyone else think this sends a bad message to fans about the CFL? That two drugged-out castoffs are somehow desirable (and will probably start)? Isn't it also kind of disrespectful toward the NFL at least with their suspension of Williams?
With regards to Ricky, I agree entirely. They should respect the NFL ban.

As for Onterrio Smith, he has served his time, but the CFL needs to adopt a drug policy of their own or it will become the Cannabis Football League.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 04:09 PM   #5
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

I really don't have a problem with football players smoking the reefer. Roids are a different story.
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 05:28 PM   #6
Bobblehead
Franchise Player
 
Bobblehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
I really don't have a problem with football players smoking the reefer. Roids are a different story.
ood point. I had been lumping everything as 'drugs', but I guess it should specify 'performance enhancing' drugs.

Can weed be a masking agent?
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
Bobblehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 05:30 PM   #7
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead
ood point. I had been lumping everything as 'drugs', but I guess it should specify 'performance enhancing' drugs.

Can weed be a masking agent?
Not as far as I know. The IOC doesn't think so at least. If anything pot is performance inhibiting whether it masks or not.
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 05:33 PM   #8
CaramonLS
Retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
I really don't have a problem with football players smoking the reefer.
I do. If you can't keep drugs out of your system for the millions upon millions of dollars they are paying you, you've got some problems with substance abuse.
CaramonLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 05:41 PM   #9
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaramonLS
I do. If you can't keep drugs out of your system for the millions upon millions of dollars they are paying you, you've got some problems with substance abuse.
Unless it's affecting your playing it's really nobody's business but your own.
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 05:44 PM   #10
CaramonLS
Retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Unless it's affecting your playing it's really nobody's business but your own.
So pot has absolutely no effect on your performance at sporting events?

You signed a legally binding contract, smoking reefer is violating that agreement. You also entered into agreement with a certain franchise too.
CaramonLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 05:56 PM   #11
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaramonLS
So pot has absolutely no effect on your performance at sporting events?
Didn't seem to affect Ricky when he ran for over 2000 yards 3 years ago.

Quote:
You signed a legally binding contract, smoking reefer is violating that agreement. You also entered into agreement with a certain franchise too.
It's only violating it if there's a clause that says "I will not smoke pot."
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 06:40 PM   #12
calf
broke the first rule
 
calf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
It's only violating it if there's a clause that says "I will not smoke pot."
it's violating it when you're unionized and part of your CBA is following the substance abuse policy

That being said, regarding Onterrio Smith - the guy showed up to TC with about 20lbs of "extra baggage"...he's gonna have to work incredibly hard to get playing time out of the gate.
calf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 07:39 PM   #13
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Unless it's affecting your playing it's really nobody's business but your own.
Well considering its illegal it is more than just your own business.

And it has affected Williams play as it caused him to quit playing for a season and has affected his off field training and ability when he came back.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2006, 03:56 PM   #14
StoneCole
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Probably playing Xbox, or...you know...
Exp:
Default

I'm gonna' have to side with rubecube:

"what's the big ****in' deal bitches?"

1. It's not a performance enhancer.
2. It's not a masking agent.
3. It really doesn't affect play at all...no more than alcohol, and I think it's less problematic than athletes gambling (ie. costs less in the long run).

It may be illegal, but so is jaywalking. Anyone who's never jaywalked hands up. My point is, if it doesn't affect their game, it's their business.
__________________
That's the bottom line, because StoneCole said so!
StoneCole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2006, 08:58 PM   #15
Antithesis
Disenfranchised
 
Antithesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Exp:
Default

I don't think the issue is a moral one in terms of "people should not smoke marijuana, it is wrong" or even, "it is illegal, therefore wrong and damnable". I think the issue is more that it is, in addition to illegal, banned in both players' CBAs, and this is something that they were certainly aware of.

Continuing to use seems to indicate (to me, at least) an unwillingness to follow rules. Where does it extend to? Practice times? Expectations? It also demonstrates a lack of control which would strike me as a problematic trait in a professional athlete.
Antithesis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2006, 08:02 AM   #16
rubecube
Franchise Player
 
rubecube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antithesis
I don't think the issue is a moral one in terms of "people should not smoke marijuana, it is wrong" or even, "it is illegal, therefore wrong and damnable". I think the issue is more that it is, in addition to illegal, banned in both players' CBAs, and this is something that they were certainly aware of.

Continuing to use seems to indicate (to me, at least) an unwillingness to follow rules. Where does it extend to? Practice times? Expectations? It also demonstrates a lack of control which would strike me as a problematic trait in a professional athlete.
Well I guess maybe the issue should be whether it belongs in the CBA or not. IMO, it shouldn't.
rubecube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2006, 03:05 PM   #17
snappyk
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Smith showed up to camp 30 pounds overwieght and says that he his hurt so he isn't even doing anything right now.
__________________
Hey, those are some good cheese fires.
snappyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2006, 09:58 PM   #18
snappyk
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

ESPN has picked up the story about how he is in danger of getting cut by the Bombers now

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2461538
__________________
Hey, those are some good cheese fires.
snappyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 PM.

Calgary Flames
2025-26






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy