I honestly would only be upset if they chose 2/5 options, the other 3 I could each justify.
Giving it back and lowering business taxes. I dont think Calgary is lacking for jobs, and businesses arent lacking customers so no reason to lower the business tax IMO.
Same goes for the residential tax. If you lower the residential tax, home values go up. Which means that a portion of the money returned to citizens will make its way to that dastardly Cal Wenzel. At least a business tax reduction benefits all businesses equally. We're not lacking residents... in fact, new residents are a fiscal burden on the city (though it's not their fault that we're not charging what we should for the new houses that support population growth).
SebC - did you want to update the first post with this stuff?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk
Public Engagement launched today.
You can go to calgary.ca/52million to look at all the information about each option and give your feedback.
Here are videos explaining each option and an intro video from the Mayor:
Intro
“Let the buses roll” Creating a new capital fund for Calgary Transit.
The idea
The RouteAhead strategy, which was developed in consultation with citizens and approved by Council in March 2013, is a 30-year, customer-oriented strategy to improve public transit in Calgary. $12.9 billion is required to fund the projects identified in RouteAhead but there is no identified source of funding. The $52 million per year would allow Calgary Transit to start several of these projects.
The problem it solves
A dedicated transit capital fund of $52 million a year for five years would allow high priority, small to medium scale projects to be built in different areas of the city.
These projects would improve transportation choices for Calgarians, providing more frequent and reliable transit options. This is the only option of the five that might leverage other funding sources from other governments. Calgary Transit estimates that each dollar in this fund could attract up to $1.50 in matching funds from the provincial and federal governments.
The highest priority projects for this funding, pending other funding sources, include:
Construction of new Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)/transitway projects, potentially including:
Transitways along the future Green Line, including Centre Street North and the Southeast Transitway (SETWAY)
The Southwest transitway, connecting downtown and Mount Royal University to Southwest communities as far as Woodbine along 14th St S.W.
The East 17th Transitway along 17th Avenue S.E. to downtown
South Crosstown BRT from Foothills Industrial through Quarry Park to Mount Royal University
North Crosstown BRT from Northeast communities to the University of Calgary and Foothills Hospital
West Campus BRT, connecting University of Calgary, Foothills, the Alberta Children’s Hospital and the Northwest LRT
Acquisition of new CTrain cars to begin four-car service at all times on the existing lines, reducing crowding, and replacing old trains that are less comfortable and more prone to breakdowns.
How it would work
Projects would be identified and prioritized based on criteria Council established in RouteAhead and our Investing in Mobility Plan and approved by Council in our regular budget process.
Of all the five options, this one is most likely to incur future operating costs as we put more buses and trains in service. This means that Council would need to cover these costs by cutting expenses elsewhere, by giving transit more tax funding, or by increasing the money that comes from fares – though more riders or higher fares.
For more information, please visit routeahead.ca.
---
Give business a break Reducing non-residential property taxes
The idea
The $52 million could be used to reduce the difference in tax rates between residential and non-residential properties. At the moment, non-residential properties (mostly commercial properties like stores and offices as well as industrial properties like factories) are taxed at a higher rate than residential properties: for every dollar of assessed value, a business pays 3.91 times as much as a homeowner does.
The problem it solves
While Calgary has the lowest residential municipal property taxes of any major city in Canada, our business tax rates are in the middle of the pack. Calgary is phasing out the stand-alone business tax, as most cities in Canada have done. This will be offset by increases to non-residential taxes, with the overall impact will being revenue-neutral.
A number of business organizations, including the Calgary Chamber of Commerce, believe that reducing the non-residential tax rate could make Calgary a more appealing place to do business, benefiting the city’s economy by attracting more people to live, work and play here. This would help to contribute to a healthy local economy and job creation.
How it would work
The exact mechanics of how to apply the $52 million to business taxes have not been finalized, but the money would reduce the differential from 3.91 to 3.67. In other words, for every $1.00 of residential property tax collected, $3.67 of non-residential property tax would be collected.
---
Revitalize our communities Investing in the maintenance and upgrading of older neighbourhoods
The Idea
A Revitalizing Our Communities Fund would provide comprehensive neighbourhood infrastructure upgrades, community by community, to support redevelopment and make older neighbourhoods more liveable.
The Problem it Solves
About 90 communities in Calgary are more than 50 years old, and there is insufficient funding to maintain what we have and replace what needs to be upgraded. Projects in different areas and from different City departments are undertaken as funding becomes available and needs become urgent. Work within a single community is done over time and not all at once.
Putting $52 million a year for five years into a Revitalizing Our Communities Fund would allow different types of infrastructure to be completed in a coordinated and timely manner within communities, including:
Replacement and enhancement of sidewalks, curbs and gutters, as well as street light replacement, overhead utility relocation and road, cycling, and pedestrian enhancements; and
Maintenance and modest upgrades to parks, pathways, playgrounds, community buildings, and community recreation facilities.
Depending on which infrastructure improvements are chosen, there may be associated future operating costs which would have to be covered by property taxes.
How it would work
Every year, a number of communities would be chosen for comprehensive investments, with the goal of cycling through all of Calgary’s communities as they age. (Edmonton has a similar program, though limited to roads, sidewalks, and streetlights).
The City would work jointly with communities to understand community goals, identify infrastructure needs and implement upgrades. Existing initiatives, such as our local area planning process, The Centre City implementation program, “Inspiring Strong Neighbourhoods” and “Supporting Partnerships for Urban Investment” could be used as the tools to link this funding with needs identified by citizens.
---
Drop the debt Reduce The City’s debt and annual interest payments
The idea
The City, like all governments, sometimes uses debt to build certain projects. This means that we must pay interest payments every year. Reducing debt would allow us to decrease these interest payments and ultimately save us all money. Although Calgary maintains a very high credit rating, the current level of debt is relatively high, and this limits The City’s ability to borrow for future capital projects – City-owned infrastructure, facilities and other improvements that provide services to the public, such as overpasses or C-Train lines.
The problem it solves
Calgary currently has $3.4 billion in debt. While we believe this to be manageable, and we maintain excellent credit ratings, it is high by historical standards.
This funding would enable The City to pay down some of its existing debt, or avoid taking on some new debt for large infrastructure projects. Lower debt would create annual savings for The City in interest costs.
That means that this option is the only one that would certainly reduce operating budgets (and the associated taxes needed to fund them) in the future.
How it would work
It is difficult to calculate the exact impact of this debt reduction, as The City has many different categories of debt, some of which may be repaid early but some of which have significant penalties for early repayment. Since interest rates change over time, the amount of annual savings would vary depending on what interest rates are at the time that the debt is eliminated or avoided.
However, with an interest rate of 3.0 per cent as an example, this funding would save an estimated $1.56 million in interest per year, or about $1 per month in taxes to the average home.
For every additional year that debt is retired the combined annual savings grow. Eliminating $52 million of debt in one year would provide an estimated annual saving of $1.56 million in interest per year. Eliminating an additional $52 million of debt in the second year would increase the total annual savings to approximately $3.1 million per year. This combined incremental annual savings would increase with every additional amount of debt eliminated.
For more information, please see The City’s Long-Range Financial Plan.
---
Give it back Lowering the tax that homeowners pay
The idea
For 2013, City Council approved a combined property tax rate increase of 5.5 per cent. On the median single residential property (assessed at $410,000), this tax increase would be $135 per year.
Returning the $52 million to the residential taxpayer would mean that the combined property tax increase would have been just $9 per year – a savings of $10.50 per month or $126 per year versus the current plan.
The problem it solves
Calgary has the lowest property taxes of any major city in Canada, and we are proud of that advantage. Lowering overall residential property taxes would provide direct benefit to taxpayers by making more money available for your own priorities.
How it would work
Because of the timing of the Provincial government’s requisition and the need to print the tax bills on time, you would not see a change for 2013, but the reduction would start in 2014.
The planned increase to non-residential property taxpayers would remain the same.
__________________
Trust the snake.
Last edited by Bunk; 05-16-2013 at 05:22 PM.
The Following User Says Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
I dislike any option involving transit. I don't understand CP's and the City's love affair with everything having to revolve around transit.
Every time I turn on the news: "Blah, blah Transit!", "Hey, the Transit train goes all the way west now!" "Hey look, we need to build transit for the people that moved to a community that does have it, even though they moved there KNOWING it didn't exist and had no hard time-line on going in." "WOOOOHHHHH TRANSIT!!!!" <insert Keanu Reeves as Ted here>
Meanwhile, I get to drive down that dirt road of a McKnight Blvd (from Barlow to Deerfoot - both west and east) everyday.
Some of us like to drive and find the buses and c-trains disgusting.
Invest in the communities is my pick or refund. Fix some roads.
<done rant>
Last edited by RedMileDJ; 05-17-2013 at 01:30 AM.
Reason: PG'd down my post.
Council just decided that the $52M tax room will be rebated in 2014, and then go to funding transit (SETWAY and North Central) for 10 years after that - so $520M.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to frinkprof For This Useful Post:
Did the suburb hating Nenshi and Farrell vote against the Setway?
No, the inner-city loving Nenshi and Farrell voted in favor of the North-Central transitway and the Setway that will make it easier to get to Inglewood.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
Hooray. Gotta give credit to Keating who switched sides after finding out going door to door during his campaign that 90% of people he talked to were in favour of putting it towards transit rather then getting it back.
