11-22-2013, 03:07 PM
|
#301
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The wagon's name is "Gaudreau"
|
Oh the irony. Cal Wenzel's using this defamation lawsuit to defame Nenshi. But had he not sued Nenshi, many probably wouldn't have even remembered his name (at least I wouldn't... nor would I have learned that he founded Shame homes), since the secret video story had almost passed the public eye. So in turn, his defamation lawsuit against Nenshi to defame Nenshi is defaming himself.
What a tangled web we weave.
__________________
|
|
|
11-22-2013, 04:03 PM
|
#302
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaramonLS
...
You're being extremely disingenious if you really believe that is the only reason companies like Shane Homes and other builders donate money.
Businesses are generally concerned about what generates profits. Nenshi's policies are cutting into those profits, so trying to derail his policies by getting other candidates elected or discredit him is the best way to accomplish that agenda.
|
You are taking my post out of context. The remark about donations was in response to an idiotic comment wishing Wenzel to die of heart attack.
Charitable donations are an effective way for businesses and individuals to give back to the community and, yes, raise their public profile. It is recognized as such by all developed countries. Questioning the motives of donations is pointless. The net effect is money to worthy causes that otherwise would not have it.
Note that I don't try defending what Wenzel said on tape during that meeting. For the record, I do believe it was politically nearsighted and borderline childish (which shows how inexperienced even the largest Calgary homebuilders are when it comes to municipal politics). But he did express his disappointment with the political direction openly and he proposed a legal course of action to deal with his disappointment to people that felt the same way about it. He is not suing Nenshi for disagreeing with him politically but for statements he finds insulting that are made by a public figure.
|
|
|
11-22-2013, 04:27 PM
|
#303
|
Norm!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak
When he was giving his Ward by Ward evaluation of each of the Aldermen, this is what he said in reference to Druh Farrell:
He admits to donating his employees' time (which has "in kind" value as a political contribution) in addition to giving $5000 to Taylor's campaign, which technically violates the contribution limits (although, I'm sure this sort of thing happens a lot).
It's not exactly a confession to murder.
|
That's addressed in the lawsuit as well.
|
|
|
11-22-2013, 04:34 PM
|
#304
|
Referee
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Over the hill
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
That's addressed in the lawsuit as well.
|
I am getting the impression you have not read the letter Nenshi's counsel sent to counsel for Wenzel. If you haven't, check it out. It clarifies a lot of these issues, and makes a pretty compelling case for why Wenzel has completely pantsed himself with this lawsuit.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Iowa_Flames_Fan For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-22-2013, 05:05 PM
|
#305
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Market Mall Food Court
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowa_Flames_Fan
I am getting the impression you have not read the letter Nenshi's counsel sent to counsel for Wenzel. If you haven't, check it out. It clarifies a lot of these issues, and makes a pretty compelling case for why Wenzel has completely pantsed himself with this lawsuit.
|
Thanked for using the word 'pantsed'.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bertuzzied For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-22-2013, 09:21 PM
|
#306
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
That's addressed in the lawsuit as well.
|
No it isn't. The reference to paying for the volunteers' use of the Shane Homes trucks by issuing gas cards doesn't cut it. As previously mentioned on this thread, you don't rent a vehicle and just pay for gas. And the employees get to use the company vehicles personally all the time, without limit, when they are not on the job? If they could show that was the case and not a special exception for the election period while working on specific campaigns, maybe. Otherwise it looks like a contribution over what is allowed.
|
|
|
11-23-2013, 03:03 PM
|
#307
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh
Note that I don't try defending what Wenzel said on tape during that meeting. For the record, I do believe it was politically nearsighted and borderline childish (which shows how inexperienced even the largest Calgary homebuilders are when it comes to municipal politics). But he did express his disappointment with the political direction openly and he proposed a legal course of action to deal with his disappointment to people that felt the same way about it. He is not suing Nenshi for disagreeing with him politically but for statements he finds insulting that are made by a public figure.
|
In respect to the bolded, isn't it equally likely that he/they have had similar meetings with similar comments in the past, that never got captured on video. (Phones with quality video recording are a relatively new thing, after all, and he would have presumed the members of his little gathering were trustworthy)
He could be experienced bringing venal tactics to politics, but unused to getting called on it.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bizaro86 For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-23-2013, 05:18 PM
|
#308
|
Basement Chicken Choker
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In a land without pants, or war, or want. But mostly we care about the pants.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartcar
And the employees get to use the company vehicles personally all the time, without limit, when they are not on the job?
|
That would be a taxable benefit if they did, so it still would mean the use of the vehicle has value. The argument that allowing use of company vehicles shouldn't count as a political contribution is pretty weak and relies on trying to get around the law, which is where the weaselly part comes in.
__________________
Better educated sadness than oblivious joy.
|
|
|
11-23-2013, 05:34 PM
|
#309
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jammies
That would be a taxable benefit if they did, so it still would mean the use of the vehicle has value. The argument that allowing use of company vehicles shouldn't count as a political contribution is pretty weak and relies on trying to get around the law, which is where the weaselly part comes in.
|
Unless you are on call 24 hours a day. My employer, a mutli national company, added that to our business cards for that very exemption,
|
|
|
11-23-2013, 05:37 PM
|
#310
|
Basement Chicken Choker
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In a land without pants, or war, or want. But mostly we care about the pants.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaiJin
Unless you are on call 24 hours a day. My employer, a mutli national company, added that to our business cards for that very exemption,
|
Interesting, I did not know that. Maybe Cal's plan is to shower the judge with business cards: "Making it rain, Your Honour! Making it rain!"
__________________
Better educated sadness than oblivious joy.
|
|
|
11-23-2013, 05:39 PM
|
#311
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartcar
No it isn't. The reference to paying for the volunteers' use of the Shane Homes trucks by issuing gas cards doesn't cut it. As previously mentioned on this thread, you don't rent a vehicle and just pay for gas. And the employees get to use the company vehicles personally all the time, without limit, when they are not on the job? If they could show that was the case and not a special exception for the election period while working on specific campaigns, maybe. Otherwise it looks like a contribution over what is allowed.
|
The real problem there is Wenzel stating that he has the vehicles out doing this work. The statements in the video are very clearly that he has authorized Shane Homes' property to be donated toward candidate's cause, on top of a maximum cash donation. Ergo, Wenzel has admitted that he (through his company) exceeded said contribution limits. It is rather hard to see where Wenzel's lawsuit is anything but frivolous given his own statements in the video defeat his statements in his lawsuit.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-02-2013, 01:48 PM
|
#312
|
Draft Pick
|
I am glad. Nenshi hasn't done anything for this city since he was first elected.
-Raised taxes like nobodies business and tries to sell we have lower tax rates than any large city in Canada which is not true. Vancouver has a lower property tax rate and they have more included in their taxes.
-Stopped yard waste pick up to save money now my 74 year old Grandmother has to pay a company to come and pick up her yard trimmings.
-Spouts off a bunch of nonsense that has always bordered on slander/defamation and he is finally being held accountable for it!
-He did nothing during the floods except show Redford and Harper around the city. He made a couple witty comments, that's it. Did he do anything to physically help the city? no? Jon Mar did - lesson learned; don't actually help or you lose your job.
|
|
|
12-02-2013, 01:52 PM
|
#313
|
Realtor®
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luongo52
I am glad. Nenshi hasn't done anything for this city since he was first elected.
-Raised taxes like nobodies business and tries to sell we have lower tax rates than any large city in Canada which is not true. Vancouver has a lower property tax rate and they have more included in their taxes.
-Stopped yard waste pick up to save money now my 74 year old Grandmother has to pay a company to come and pick up her yard trimmings.
-Spouts off a bunch of nonsense that has always bordered on slander/defamation and he is finally being held accountable for it!
-He did nothing during the floods except show Redford and Harper around the city. He made a couple witty comments, that's it. Did he do anything to physically help the city? no? Jon Mar did - lesson learned; don't actually help or you lose your job.
|
Welcome to CP.
How you can say he did nothing during the floods is beyond me and to top it off with "don't actually help or you lose your job" is very childish. Im willing to go on the record and say I do not believe he lost his job for helping with the floods.
|
|
|
12-02-2013, 01:53 PM
|
#314
|
My face is a bum!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luongo52
-Stopped yard waste pick up to save money now my 74 year old Grandmother has to pay a company to come and pick up her yard trimmings.
|
I saw the garbage man pick up the 3 large orange bags of leaves I left on the ground beside my black bin. You're grandma should call 311 instead of getting pissed at Nenshi.
Quote:
Jon Mar did - lesson learned; don't actually help or you lose your job.
|
Jon Mar, who aligned himself with a charity, was on it's board, then they tweeted everyone on their list of flood victims to vote for him, and he denied knowing about it?
Yup, his intentions were totally pure with the flood...
|
|
|
12-02-2013, 01:58 PM
|
#315
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luongo52
I am glad. Nenshi hasn't done anything for this city since he was first elected.
-Raised taxes like nobodies business and tries to sell we have lower tax rates than any large city in Canada which is not true. Vancouver has a lower property tax rate and they have more included in their taxes.
-Stopped yard waste pick up to save money now my 74 year old Grandmother has to pay a company to come and pick up her yard trimmings.
-Spouts off a bunch of nonsense that has always bordered on slander/defamation and he is finally being held accountable for it!
-He did nothing during the floods except show Redford and Harper around the city. He made a couple witty comments, that's it. Did he do anything to physically help the city? no? Jon Mar did - lesson learned; don't actually help or you lose your job.
|
Awesome, you are going to do great here.
|
|
|
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
|
ae118,
Bertuzzied,
cam_wmh,
cupofjoe,
getbak,
I-Hate-Hulse,
jayswin,
KelVarnsen,
Minnie,
MrMastodonFarm,
Rathji,
Regulator75,
Resolute 14,
surferguy,
Table 5,
Yeah_Baby,
You Need a Thneed
|
12-02-2013, 02:04 PM
|
#316
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NYYC
|
Hey Nenshi. Take leaves, not jerbs.
|
|
|
12-02-2013, 02:21 PM
|
#317
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luongo52
I am glad. Nenshi hasn't done anything for this city since he was first elected.
-Raised taxes like nobodies business and tries to sell we have lower tax rates than any large city in Canada which is not true. Vancouver has a lower property tax rate and they have more included in their taxes.
-Stopped yard waste pick up to save money now my 74 year old Grandmother has to pay a company to come and pick up her yard trimmings.
-Spouts off a bunch of nonsense that has always bordered on slander/defamation and he is finally being held accountable for it!
-He did nothing during the floods except show Redford and Harper around the city. He made a couple witty comments, that's it. Did he do anything to physically help the city? no? Jon Mar did - lesson learned; don't actually help or you lose your job.
|
Your grandmother should really be composting.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Barnes For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-02-2013, 02:37 PM
|
#318
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
I'm glad he's no longer representing this city as a councillor
Last edited by Tyler; 12-03-2013 at 10:16 AM.
|
|
|
12-02-2013, 06:35 PM
|
#319
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hulkrogan
Jon Mar, who aligned himself with a charity, was on it's board, then they tweeted everyone on their list of flood victims to vote for him, and he denied knowing about it?
Yup, his intentions were totally pure with the flood...
|
Mar's non-profit is not yet a charity and still crossed a line by endorsing a particular candidate (something charities aren't allowed to do)
In my neighborhood ( Mission AKA flood central) Mar lost because of his policies regarding development and secondary suites...
Note: Your mileage may vary
|
|
|
12-02-2013, 07:13 PM
|
#320
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Mar lost because he positioned himself as a centrist, and thus left the door open to flanked by by a more progressive candidate.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:48 PM.
|
|