Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-30-2013, 10:14 PM   #1
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default Leafs 4 Flames 2

http://www.calgarypuck.com/2013/10/g...fs-4-flames-2/
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2013, 10:16 PM   #2
looooob
Franchise Player
 
looooob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Ashton did get a minor but sob got 2-5-10
looooob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 10:31 PM   #3
JobHopper
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I think the story to this game is that the Flames played as well as they did with pretty much 3 lines and Backlund a healthy scratch. That means they can add 4 new players to this lineup. There has to be 2 players right now in Abbotsford that can be called up.
You can expect some roster changes and trades coming soon.
JobHopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 10:46 PM   #4
Superfraggle
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

"Backlund may not be producing but he’s a far shot from the team’s best 5th best defenseman."

huh?
Superfraggle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 03:33 AM   #5
FlameZilla
First Line Centre
 
FlameZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Superfraggle View Post
"Backlund may not be producing but he’s a far shot from the team’s best 5th best defenseman."

huh?
Pretty sure he meant centreman.

I'd agree on all observations, especially:

-Colborne shows promise & played with a lot of fire, but did he deserve 24 minutes?
-Backlund has played hard every minute I've seen of him this season. Did he really deserve zero minutes? The Baertschi & Backlund scratches are bad precedents to set, in my opinion. They may not be tearing up the league but they play with a lot of heart & skill.
-With S.O.B. & McGrattan in the lineup I think Jackman is unnecessary, especially if he was only going to play 3 minutes.

I would add that pulling the goalie while on the power play, but before we'd established the offensive zone, was a careless mistake by Hartley. Hudler was awfully soft on that play.

As good as the team has played we're just way too soft in front of our goalie. Ramo killed our momentum with that weak goal, but the 1st & 3rd goals were on 2nd or 3rd rebounds in the crease, with Leafs players standing wherever they wanted. Man do I miss Robin Regehr from circa 10 years ago...
FlameZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FlameZilla For This Useful Post:
Old 10-31-2013, 05:25 AM   #6
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

SOB is a POS. I was so mad when they showed the flames on an odd man rush then it stopped because he dropped the gloves. I know they scored on the pp but I think it would have meant more if they scored on the rush like that.

Jackman is terrible and as long as he's on the ice, we have a good chance of losing.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 06:21 AM   #7
FlamingLonghorn
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Austin, Tx
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
SOB is a POS. I was so mad when they showed the flames on an odd man rush then it stopped because he dropped the gloves. I know they scored on the pp but I think it would have meant more if they scored on the rush like that.

Jackman is terrible and as long as he's on the ice, we have a good chance of losing.
I disagree about SOB. The best way to protect your players from being hit like that is to show them you have someone who doesn't care about the instigator rule. SOB knows it's not that big of a deal if he sits.
FlamingLonghorn is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to FlamingLonghorn For This Useful Post:
Old 10-31-2013, 06:27 AM   #8
8sPOT
Powerplay Quarterback
 
8sPOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Tough to lose a game like that. Certainly came to down to goaltending. Not that Ramo was horrible, but Bernier was awesome. Gotta like how we played though, we essentially dominated. Faceoffs remain an area where we consistenly lag against the opponent.

Also, I'd like to think that Backlund draws back into the lineup against the Wings.
8sPOT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 06:49 AM   #9
playmaker
Scoring Winger
 
playmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: at home
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8spot View Post
tough to lose a game like that. Certainly came to down to goaltending defense . Not that ramo was horrible, but bernier was awesome. Gotta like how we played though, we essentially dominated. Faceoffs remain an area where we consistenly lag against the opponent.

Also, i'd like to think that backlund draws back into the lineup against the wings.
fyp

Ramo has smallest and softest D-core in the NHL in front of him.

Last edited by playmaker; 10-31-2013 at 06:54 AM.
playmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to playmaker For This Useful Post:
Old 10-31-2013, 07:01 AM   #10
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

I think Colborn over Backlund comes down to size in a game where the head coach maybe overestimated how physical the Leafs would be. Also Colborn is the first Flame I have seen in years that's willing to stand in front of the net consistently and take the punishment. You aren't going to get that from Backlund although I would be lying if I said I would rather Jackman never suit up for the Flames again during this rebuild. He adds nothing especially with McGratton in the lineup. Re-signing him was and still is a big head scratcher for me especially when it appears the Sharks were actually willing to give up a draft pick for him a few years back. When you can get any asset for a plug at a trade deadline where you are clearly going to miss the playoffs you have to take that.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 07:38 AM   #11
Flames89
First Line Centre
 
Flames89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, ON
Exp:
Default

Jackman was put in over Backlund due to the Leafs size/scrappyness. I can understand the decision. You don't want the Leafs running us with only McGrattan to protect us. We don't have much size otherwise (Colborne, while tall, is not an imposing presence). However, it's a tough message for Backlund, and I would prefer his skill and learning to play with more "truculence". Don't like getting pushed around? Then don't let yourself be pushed around.
Colborne was likely given the extra ice time due to his recent play and Hartley's belief in the extra motivation of playing against a team that gave up on you.
Flames89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 07:57 AM   #12
lifetimefan
First Line Centre
 
lifetimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Stuck on old squelch.
Exp:
Default

If I had to choose between 3 minutes of Jackman on the ice, and 3 minutes of Backlund, I'd choose Backlund.
lifetimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 07:59 AM   #13
Cheese
Franchise Player
 
Cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Exp:
Default

re Butler. I counted at least 3 horrible plays. Just continues to under impress.
Cheese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 08:09 AM   #14
killer_carlson
Franchise Player
 
killer_carlson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Im speculating that Colborne is getting the increased icetime to see if he can be a bonafide third line center, possible second line because we have a trade lined up for Stajan or Possibly Backlund.

They may not want to pull the trigger if he falls on his face.

My bet is Stajan has some suitors as a rental, or a salary inclusion if we take some salary back.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
killer_carlson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 08:21 AM   #15
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by playmaker View Post
fyp

Ramo has smallest and softest D-core in the NHL in front of him.
You watched the Oilers play? I would take Gio, SOB, and Wideman's grit over any of their defenseman sans maybe Ferrence who happens to be undersized.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 08:27 AM   #16
strombad
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Exp:
Default

At this point, I would be perfectly happy if we got rid of Jackman (I don't even care if we get assests for him) and Stajan.

Jackman, kind of like Glencross in a way, is showing that with the new makeup of the team he is a step behind and really has some terrible flaws. It was all good a couple years ago in the country club atmosphere to have a hard nosed guy like him, but now with Grats and our sudden ability to play aggressively right down the roster, I'm not sure how he is even earning a couple minutes a night.

Stajan at times has been solid for us, but I think it's time we let him go. He wins faceoffs better than most other guys on this team, but with the way Backlund and Colborne are playing, he's become entirely redundant.

Those are the only two moves I think we should be making right now.
strombad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 08:45 AM   #17
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Actually Lupul had the opener. Raymond scored their 3rd.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 08:50 AM   #18
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cheese View Post
re Butler. I counted at least 3 horrible plays. Just continues to under impress.
Indeed. On the first goal he did nothing but stand in the net and on the third he flops to the ice and stretched out he still gets walked around. Useless.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2013, 09:04 AM   #19
Bootsy
Scoring Winger
 
Bootsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
SOB is a POS. I was so mad when they showed the flames on an odd man rush then it stopped because he dropped the gloves. I know they scored on the pp but I think it would have meant more if they scored on the rush like that.

Jackman is terrible and as long as he's on the ice, we have a good chance of losing.
Are you kidding me? You'd be a horrible teammate. What Ashton did, was about as dirty of a play as you can do in hockey , as a team you don't tolerate that kind of BS regardless of timing. It was the right thing to do. Good on SOB for breaking that punk's nose.

On a side note if Shanahan doesn't throw the book at Ashton , it'll just show what a laughable joke the league is. This was 10 times worse than Kaleta's hit on Johnson.
Bootsy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Bootsy For This Useful Post:
Old 10-31-2013, 09:33 AM   #20
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
Indeed. On the first goal he did nothing but stand in the net and on the third he flops to the ice and stretched out he still gets walked around. Useless.
Yep on the first goal he had no rebound control. He should get replaced by Berra!!
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:19 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy