Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-30-2013, 09:14 AM   #1
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default How the Gov't is Wasting Education Dollars

http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/ca...238/story.html

Great use of money in the inner city where Redford's riding is. Based on the facts, (school old, already wrecked, on a flood plain, extra space in nearby school) the Elbow Park school should get shut down and the kids relocated. But it's a rich inner city neighbourhood, so that's not what's happening. Instead, we're spending a huge amount of money building a temporary school, so the children "don't have to blend with the Earl Grey Elementary students."

Looks like decisions are being made in an exceptional way. I also like this Tory education doozy.

Jeff Johnson, Minister of Education, was quoted saying regarding classes with 40+ students: "If there are specific situations like that, I want to know about them."

http://metronews.ca/news/calgary/793...tion-minister/

Then, after the predictable flood of people contacting him about their children' 40+ student classes, we're hearing this:

"But now the minister says he doesn’t believe widespread reports from administrators, teachers, parents and even students of high-school classes with 40 or more kids to be concrete proof of whether a problem exists"

http://metronews.ca/news/calgary/839...size-struggle/

So, in summary: We're spending $5.3 million on temporary spots while we rebuild a school in a flood zone we don't need because rich people complained. But we can't afford to keep class sizes below 40+ even though everyone else complained.

Can I suggest a shift in priorities?
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bizaro86 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2013, 09:44 AM   #2
Puppet Guy
Franchise Player
 
Puppet Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the dark side of Sesame Street
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/ca...238/story.html

Great use of money in the inner city where Redford's riding is. Based on the facts, (school old, already wrecked, on a flood plain, extra space in nearby school) the Elbow Park school should get shut down and the kids relocated. But it's a rich inner city neighbourhood, so that's not what's happening. Instead, we're spending a huge amount of money building a temporary school, so the children "don't have to blend with the Earl Grey Elementary students."
do the kids at Earl Grey all have leprosy or something?

The closer my kids get to school, the more I think about home-schooling.
__________________
"If Javex is your muse…then dive in buddy"

- Surferguy
Puppet Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 10:05 AM   #3
REDVAN
Franchise Player
 
REDVAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

It's always a scandal with the AB Tories these days. Boo urns.
__________________
REDVAN!
REDVAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 10:28 AM   #4
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

so the students that aren't allowed to go to Earl Grey go to Morlok high?
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 11:04 AM   #5
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDVAN View Post
It's always a scandal with the AB Tories these days. Boo urns.
This is actually two scandals, imo, with the theme being that Jeff Johnson and the Tories are incapable of competently running education in the province.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 12:12 PM   #6
OldDutch
#1 Goaltender
 
OldDutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North of the River, South of the Bluff
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puppet Guy View Post
do the kids at Earl Grey all have leprosy or something?

The closer my kids get to school, the more I think about home-schooling.
Actually from friends who have relatives who go there, it is the reverse. I guess the Mount Royals haven't been too welcoming either. The other concern is that the Elbow Park group will lose their close knit community as the school is a huge part of their social circle. They are afraid that they will just amalgamate the two schools long term (ie: what happens to the 99.9% of us in similar circumstances)

So you have rich people not helping other rich people, who in turn want nothing to do with the rich people spurning them. It is all pretty comical if not for the fact that it is the kids who are in the middle, who despite their silver spoons probably just want to go somewhere and learn.

And they wonder why rich kids have more problems than most...
OldDutch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OldDutch For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2013, 12:29 PM   #7
para transit fellow
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

I recall the Rod Love was upset at the initial move

http://globalnews.ca/news/734591/mou...o-green-space/

If memory serves, the kids will be displaced from Elbow park school for 2-3 years while it is being re-built
para transit fellow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 12:32 PM   #8
Frequitude
Franchise Player
 
Frequitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
Exp:
Default

Way to paint this as rich communities fighting and tories pandering to their rich constituents. Get over yourselves.

So you're suggesting permanently removing a community's elementary school from that community? Would you advocate the same for your community? Or are you advocating for bulldozing all of Elbow Park?
Frequitude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 12:48 PM   #9
para transit fellow
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

oops .. ( wrong thread)

Last edited by para transit fellow; 10-30-2013 at 01:00 PM. Reason: wrong thread
para transit fellow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 01:23 PM   #10
Frequitude
Franchise Player
 
Frequitude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 555 Saddledome Rise SE
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
As if the real people in those neighborhoods would be sending their kids to public school. If this was about Strathcona Tweedsmuir they would have a case.
But where are they going to sip lattes while watching their kids play soccer?
Frequitude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 02:20 PM   #11
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frequitude View Post
Way to paint this as rich communities fighting and tories pandering to their rich constituents. Get over yourselves.

So you're suggesting permanently removing a community's elementary school from that community? Would you advocate the same for your community? Or are you advocating for bulldozing all of Elbow Park?
Yes. Because that is objectively the right choice in this situation. The school is old, has been severely damaged, is on a floodplain, and a school 2km away. The distance between the schools is well under the provincially mandated 2.4km distance for providing out of area bus services.
http://www.cbe.ab.ca/transportation/faqs.asp

These schools are close enough that they service the same area.

If this wasn't a rich neighbourhood, the school would be closed already.

As to your first statement this is two rich communities fighting. And the Tories are pandering to a rich constituents. This is much more consideration (temporary gym) than a larger number of displaced students got in High River.

Last edited by bizaro86; 10-30-2013 at 02:23 PM.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 02:30 PM   #12
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

I gather that the Earl Grey school doesn't have capacity for both sets of students permanently, is that correct?
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 02:35 PM   #13
Rerun
Often Thinks About Pickles
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Okotoks
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Bill Moore-Kilgannon, executive director of Public Interest Alberta, questioned whether this temporary school and gymnasium in a well-off neighbourhood that already has excess classroom capacity was anywhere near the top of the CBE’s list of capital priorities, let alone those of any of the province’s other school districts.

“It would seem that those Albertans with the strongest political ties and the deepest pockets are first in line for temporary school facilities,” said Moore-Kilgannon, “while students elsewhere in the province with a desperate need for permanent schools are forced to wait.”
Quote:
By comparison, more than 750 children in Wildrose leader Danielle Smith’s constituency of High River, where two schools were also badly damaged by last summer’s high waters, will be housed at portables on two sites and share a single gymnasium.
http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/ca...238/story.html
Rerun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 02:37 PM   #14
TurnedTheCorner
Lifetime Suspension
 
TurnedTheCorner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

I don't need to know specifically how the government wastes money. I just take comfort in the fact that it does.
TurnedTheCorner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 02:48 PM   #15
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerun View Post
So I get that there is excess classroom space, but is it enough to house both sets of students?

The fact that it keeps getting mentioned like it has been means I am inclined to think that there isn't enough space for all the students, but they people are complaining for more political reasons.

Anyone have any numbers that can back up one side or the other?
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 02:58 PM   #16
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji View Post
So I get that there is excess classroom space, but is it enough to house both sets of students?

The fact that it keeps getting mentioned like it has been means I am inclined to think that there isn't enough space for all the students, but they people are complaining for more political reasons.

Anyone have any numbers that can back up one side or the other?
Earl Gray school currently has 180 students, the breakdown is here:
http://www.cbe.ab.ca/schools/view.asp?id=232

They have it by age, looks like one class per age level to me. The same page says the have 13 class rooms total. That would allow for 2 classes of grades 1-6, plus AM/PM kindergarten sharing a room.

The Elbow Park school enrollment is here: http://www.cbe.ab.ca/schools/view.asp?id=88

Adding the two enrollments it looks like 2 classes per grade would work for every grade except grade 3.

So Earl Grey would probably need to have one portable added to make it work. Instead, we're bringing in portables for everyone, a portable gym, and then rebuilding a whole school. Even if a small permanent expansion was required at Earl Grey that would be the right choice.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to bizaro86 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2013, 04:08 PM   #17
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
Earl Gray school currently has 180 students, the breakdown is here:
http://www.cbe.ab.ca/schools/view.asp?id=232

They have it by age, looks like one class per age level to me. The same page says the have 13 class rooms total. That would allow for 2 classes of grades 1-6, plus AM/PM kindergarten sharing a room.

The Elbow Park school enrollment is here: http://www.cbe.ab.ca/schools/view.asp?id=88

Adding the two enrollments it looks like 2 classes per grade would work for every grade except grade 3.

So Earl Grey would probably need to have one portable added to make it work. Instead, we're bringing in portables for everyone, a portable gym, and then rebuilding a whole school. Even if a small permanent expansion was required at Earl Grey that would be the right choice.
Thanks for the info.

So what would be the cost of a permanent expansion?

As I assume that being an older school, there might be some asbestos concerns that would shut down the school for a period of time for it to happen, or had that already bed dealt with at Earl Grey?

Could they fit it into the summer months? If not what would the cost be of a temporary solution while it was completed?
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 04:33 PM   #18
MelBridgeman
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The hill people and the bottom of the hill people don't get along - known fact
MelBridgeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 05:16 PM   #19
Nage Waza
Offered up a bag of cans for a custom user title
 
Nage Waza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Westside
Exp:
Default

I live in a relatively 'rich' area (Aspen and Strathcona Hill) and we literally have no elementary school with any space at all. I have no clue what to do in a year when my son requires schooling.
Nage Waza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2013, 05:23 PM   #20
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Instead, we're spending a huge amount of money building a temporary school, so the children "don't have to blend with the Earl Grey Elementary students."
Bunch of elitist snobs!
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:51 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy