09-08-2013, 08:16 PM
|
#881
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson
He hasnt answered what, if any, contribution to his campaign from te pembina institute or its employees. Given their lobbying and advocacy arm, it is a fair question. For the mayor openly attack manning institute candidates and demand to know where people sit, it is a fair question.
|
Oh, that question, sorry I thought the original question of the City using Pembina as a consultant. The Mayor has been saying all along that he will disclose all his donors the day the writ drops, so we'll find out on the 23rd. I suspect the Mayor has no idea off the top of his head whether they or any of their staff have donated, nor if any staff volunteer for the campaign. Even if they did, they wouldn't be in any position to influence any sort of policy position - I know this because there is a small group involved in developing policy, including myself. It would be as a private citizen in a normal volunteer capacity - putting up signs and the like.
Further to this, the Mayor discloses online (voluntarily) everyone he meets with and lobbies him. Pembina Institute hasn't as best I can see. The Mayor mentioned on twitter he hasn't been lobbied by them, save for Jesse Row speaking at a public hearing of Council, and running into him around town. I think he's been very forthright about these kinds of questions as a candidate and elected official.
__________________
Trust the snake.
Last edited by Bunk; 09-08-2013 at 08:20 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-08-2013, 08:16 PM
|
#882
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
It's one thing to be 'put on the defensive', it's another to have your character attacked by a notorious drama farmer.
You could argue that Nenshi should be above responding to a character like Levant, an argument I'd share, but I don't fault him in any significant capacity for getting down to his level and repudiating those sorts of unsubstantiated but character driven remarks.
Ezra is trying to cast a shadow, it's pathetically transparent for what it is. Nenshi to his credit is reacting with some serious humour and relative good nature. "What a loaded question" is one thing, but "Do you still beat your wife" is a specific remark to Ezra, personally. I don't even know if he's married, but it doesn't matter if he is, the comment is likely personal, a reference clearly understood by Levant, and yet still manipulated for dramatic effect.
I think Nenshi is handling this pretty astutely.
If Eric Francis asks you a loaded question, how do you respond? Francis is twice the journalist Levant is. Scratch that, he's 10 times the journalist Levant is.
|
|
|
09-08-2013, 08:24 PM
|
#883
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsavillian
While I'll agree that Nenshi should have chose better words, I don't think the outrage is warranted. On a scale of 1 to "our mayor probably smokes crack" - this is probably a 3 or 4.
He should have said "Have you stopped eating dog poo?"
|
I guess that would defeat the purpose of a reference, if you don't actually use the reference people are familiar with.
__________________
Trust the snake.
|
|
|
09-08-2013, 08:28 PM
|
#884
|
Retired
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk
Oh, that question, sorry I thought the original question of the City using Pembina as a consultant. The Mayor has been saying all along that he will disclose all his donors the day the writ drops, so we'll find out on the 23rd. I suspect the Mayor has no idea off the top of his head whether they or any of their staff have donated, nor if any staff volunteer for the campaign.
|
Oh, come on now. Of course he knows. That's why he said to Ezra, "have you stopped beating your wife".
|
|
|
09-08-2013, 08:42 PM
|
#885
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Nenshi should consult an advisor before each of his tweets. This is the third or fourth time he's got into trouble on twitter.
|
|
|
09-08-2013, 08:49 PM
|
#886
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnum PEI
Nenshi should consult an advisor before each of his tweets. This is the third or fourth time he's got into trouble on twitter.
|
It'll blow over and no one will care in a week. That's usually what happens.
Chalk it up to a causality of social media.
|
|
|
09-08-2013, 08:54 PM
|
#887
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnum PEI
Nenshi should consult an advisor before each of his tweets. This is the third or fourth time he's got into trouble on twitter.
|
But that's when the use of twitter by politicians becomes super lame. Everything you read on twitter is him and you get authentic dialogue, not one-way vetted communication. I wouldn't say he's gotten into "trouble" on twitter (not like other politicians have!)
__________________
Trust the snake.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-08-2013, 08:55 PM
|
#888
|
 Posted the 6 millionth post!
|
To me, the phrase has the same seriousness to it as "who pissed in your cornflakes?", in which there is really no harm to it at all. It is a figure of speech, unfortunately one which many probably haven't heard before or jump to conclusions about what it means.
But regarding the use of attacking catch phrases by politicians, can a dead horse also be your wife?
|
|
|
09-08-2013, 08:55 PM
|
#889
|
Celebrated Square Root Day
|
I honestly thought the "when did you stop beating your wife" thing was very common knowledge. I'm very surprised that he will likely have to clarify this.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to jayswin For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-08-2013, 08:59 PM
|
#890
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delgar
Oh, come on now. Of course he knows. That's why he said to Ezra, "have you stopped beating your wife".
|
No, he responded that way because ezra asked him the following.
Quote:
@nenshi you said the 22 Pembina staff you hired were "scientists". Most were spin doctors, 3 were registered lobbyists. Will you correct?
|
How does Nenshi answer this? Yes I will correct? No, I won't? Either answer means he agrees they were lobbyists and spin doctors but will/won't correct.
Quote:
@nenshi Pembina lobbyists say they talk policy with you at social gatherings. Will you disclose details of that lobbying? Because they won't
|
Assumes there is actual lobbying occurring, whether there is or not should probably be the first question.
Quote:
@nenshi almost half of the 22 Pembina staff you hired are PR staff. Why did you call them scientists? Are they campaigning for you?
|
Assumes they are PR staff and not scientists.
Quote:
@nenshi will you disclose whether any Pembina staff are working on your election campaign, or have donated to you? Is this a quid pro quo?
|
question goes to disclosure. Assumes there is a quid pro quo to be had.
So nenshi asked "have to stopped beating your wife".
Assumes he has a wife, and at one point beat her.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to corporatejay For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-08-2013, 09:20 PM
|
#891
|
First Line Centre
|
So, in sum:
- Nenshi (and Bunk here) has answered questions about what the Pembina Institute role has been with The City.
- Nenshi (and Bunk here) has answered whether or not he has met outside of council chambers with members of the Pembina Institute via his usual channel of regularly releasing who he meets with and who lobbies him.
- Nenshi will release (as he had in the previous election, had been planned all along, and all of this above and beyond election rules and regulations and what many other candidates do) his donor list on or around nomination day.
- Everyone here has been informed (if they didn't know already) that the phrase "do you still beat your wife?" is:
A. A very common (and likely the most common among any similar retorts, classic even) response when presented with a loaded question.
B. That it has been used in many public debates and venues whether political, legal, radio, television, etc. by people of all affiliations and stripes for many years
C. That almost anyone in the political, journalism and media spheres are familiar with it and that when it is used, it is often clarified many times over (has has been the case in this thread) many times over so that those not familiar come to understand its meaning and use, unless they're being purposely obtuse of course.
D. That, given A, B and C, is, in almost every case when used in this context, not a serious commentary on the target's spouse or the health of their domestic relationships.
-----------------
In my view, the biggest foul committed here is giving Ezra Levant the time of day.
|
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to frinkprof For This Useful Post:
|
Boblobla,
Bunk,
carom,
Flash Walken,
Iowa_Flames_Fan,
jayswin,
jtfrogger,
KelVarnsen,
Resolute 14,
TorqueDog,
You Need a Thneed
|
09-08-2013, 09:23 PM
|
#892
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk
But that's when the use of twitter by politicians becomes super lame. Everything you read on twitter is him and you get authentic dialogue, not one-way vetted communication. I wouldn't say he's gotten into "trouble" on twitter (not like other politicians have!)
|
But a lot of his tweets come across as childish and egocentric. It will cost him votes, not that he cares though.
Plus I don't like the idea of the Mayor spending his Sundays trolling the internet. that's what i do.
|
|
|
09-08-2013, 09:30 PM
|
#893
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Dear Ezra:
Having said that, I think it was a poor choice of words from Nenshi, and I'm generally a big fan of the guy. Levant and Nenshi both came out of the exchange looking childish, but only one of them is running for mayor so that's a win for Levant.
Now, can we get back to why Bunk shat his pants?
|
|
|
09-08-2013, 09:33 PM
|
#894
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
For anyone interested, Nenshi tuning in Derek Fildebrandt from the CTF on twitter over the past say 1/2 hour was pretty funny! Basically right on point and covers everything I would say.
|
|
|
09-08-2013, 09:34 PM
|
#895
|
Retired
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by corporatejay
No, he responded that way because ezra asked him the following.
How does Nenshi answer this? Yes I will correct? No, I won't? Either answer means he agrees they were lobbyists and spin doctors but will/won't correct.
Assumes there is actual lobbying occurring, whether there is or not should probably be the first question.
Assumes they are PR staff and not scientists.
question goes to disclosure. Assumes there is a quid pro quo to be had.
So nenshi asked "have to stopped beating your wife".
Assumes he has a wife, and at one point beat her.
|
You've missed the point. I'm saying Nenshi punched back instead of clearing the air because if he did clear the air, he'd look like a hypocrite. Nenshi knows he doesn't have to answer yes/no, he can give details. His response shows he chooses to hide something.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-08-2013, 09:56 PM
|
#897
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh
This is the second time in the recent few weeks that Nenshi is showing his intolerant side. First one was his sister's attack on Chris Harper. This is worrisome. This is how personality cults are born.
|
Why does Nenshi have to answer for his sister?
|
|
|
09-08-2013, 10:17 PM
|
#898
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk
...
Further to this, the Mayor discloses online (voluntarily) everyone he meets with and lobbies him. ...
|
Why does he not disclose who Chima meets with?
|
|
|
09-08-2013, 10:24 PM
|
#899
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Oh, make no mistake. Chima is nobody's pet. He's more of a kingmaker, I think.
|
|
|
09-08-2013, 11:22 PM
|
#900
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh
Why does he not disclose who Chima meets with?
|
Started with the Mayor's meetings because a) that's who people are most interested in, and b) we wanted to test the sign-in method, forms, and amount of administrative workload with a more manageable sized list.
Starting next term, all meetings with the Mayor, Council and political staff will be publicly disclosed. This is part of the new Council ethical guidelines the Mayor championed.
http://blog.calgarymayor.ca/2013/04/...city-hall.html
__________________
Trust the snake.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20 PM.
|
|