Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-05-2013, 03:47 PM   #161
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
You don't lose waiver position if you claim a player. Waiver position is purely based on standings
Even under this new CBA?
Muta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 03:50 PM   #162
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
It still doesn't make any sense to me. There is no way that an arbitrator would give Russel more than what he signed for, and so what if he did? Walking away form a #6 defenseman picked up off waivers isn't a big deal and going on waivers in the first place wouldn't put Russel in a great positon to bargain.

I tend to think what others were stating. Russell was likely plan B after something else didn't transpire and the timing of the waivers didn't work out with the other timeline.
I think you don't understand if an arbitrator awarded Russel any salary up to 3.5 million, the Flames cannot walk away they have to accept it.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2013, 03:53 PM   #163
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
I think you don't understand if an arbitrator awarded Russel any salary up to 3.5 million, the Flames cannot walk away they have to accept it.
nm did not see the not in cannot.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 03:53 PM   #164
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
I think you don't understand if an arbitrator awarded Russel any salary up to 3.5 million, the Flames cannot walk away they have to accept it.

Oh, OK I see. I still don't see that as very likely to happen, but I guess you never know.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 04:02 PM   #165
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
Even under this new CBA?
Yup just checked section 13.19 of the CBA.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
sun
Old 07-05-2013, 04:25 PM   #166
Brannigans Law
First Line Centre
 
Brannigans Law's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Calgary AB
Exp:
Default

Brannigans Law is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brannigans Law For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2013, 04:32 PM   #167
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Just to add, I can't see a defenseman who has these following qulaifications be handed a large arbitration award:
  • 8th defenseman on this team for ice-time per game,
  • missed the playoffs (was he injured?),
  • passed through waivers,
  • then traded for 5th rounder.
Such a player is lucky to even be offered an NHL contract.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 05:20 PM   #168
OzSome
Franchise Player
 
OzSome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

I like this trade. Only gave up a 5th rounder then signed him for a year with $1.5M. If he doesn't pan out after a season here he's free to go.
OzSome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 05:51 PM   #169
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I was thinking before the "free agent frenzy" began that our defence was just too darn big, and that we needed to get smaller and easier to play against. Just then, I read the news about Russell. Later, I saw we signed Butler and Billins. Great job Jay!
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2013, 06:59 PM   #170
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

I guess there is no room for Fistric now.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 07:03 PM   #171
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

Wideman - Brodie
Giordano - O'Brien
Butler - Russel
Cundari - Smith
Breen - Ramage

lots of depth, I'm sure all of those players will see some amount of games this year with the Flames. Defense by committee.
Heavy Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2013, 09:26 PM   #172
Hatter
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Hatter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I like the trade and signing.

I was fortunate to watch Russell throughout his junior career with the Tigers. Obviously he will never be a top pairing guy or replicate his gaudy junior stats (32 goals in his last junior season!) in the NHL, but he has other qualities that are desirable for the Flames.

Foremost, he is a gamer. Kris plays hard every night, partially because he has to work harder to overcome his stature, but also because he has a great attitude.

Secondly, he thinks the game very well on both ends of the ice, especially in the offensive zone. His troubles in his own end mostly stem from physical mismatches, not from poor positioning, a poor brain, or poor skating.

This is a no risk signing and I'm ecstatic. I think he has a ton more to show at this level.
Hatter is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hatter For This Useful Post:
Old 07-05-2013, 11:59 PM   #173
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon View Post
Disagree with that... they play an entirely different style.

Nobody can call Butler a "puck-moving" dman. He's a positional defensive dman. (aka why he's the whipping boy a lot, doesn't hit much, doesn't score, doesn't set up goals, he's just... there).
well...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
I don't think Butler gets enough credit for his outlet passing. He's very good at it. He can also skate it out. To me he's somewhat similar to what Leopold gave us.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
You are too focused on points. Points are not a great stat to base a defenseman's play off of. Butler along with Bouwmeester both excel at transitioning from defense to offense by moving the puck up the ice via skating or passing. .
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Well despite the claims that Butler cannot pass or handle the puck, I feel this pairing is one of the best puck moving pairings I've seen on the Flames in my 15+ years of following the team.
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 12:07 AM   #174
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
Just to add, I can't see a defenseman who has these following qulaifications be handed a large arbitration award:
  • 8th defenseman on this team for ice-time per game,
  • missed the playoffs (was he injured?),
  • passed through waivers,
  • then traded for 5th rounder.
Such a player is lucky to even be offered an NHL contract.
Yeah, there's no way he was going to be awarded much more than what he got.

However, maybe the 5th round pick was worth it to start his tenure off on a good foot with the Flames. Otherwise it's practically:

"Welcome to the Calgary Flames Russell, now here's a list of reasons you're an absolute #### defenseman."


Also saves Feaster and co some time and work on trying to get a case together for Russell, could be just that they're lazy.
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 02:48 AM   #175
FAN
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

I pretty much missed today's events. Can anyone tell me why Feaster didn't just pick Russell up on waivers? It is my understanding that Russell was on waivers like 3 days ago. Is this unnecessary waste of a draft pick or am I missing something here?

Edit: okay it was to avoid inheriting an arbitration case. Still not understanding it. Can anyone explain it to me?

Last edited by FAN; 07-06-2013 at 02:52 AM.
FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 03:09 AM   #176
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
Just to add, I can't see a defenseman who has these following qulaifications be handed a large arbitration award:
  • 8th defenseman on this team for ice-time per game,
  • missed the playoffs (was he injured?),
  • passed through waivers,
  • then traded for 5th rounder.
Such a player is lucky to even be offered an NHL contract.
- 3 of those players played 15 games or less with the Blues, meaning he was 5th on the Blues in ice-time overall
- He was a #5 defenseman that was pushed to #7 when 2 top 4 defensemen were acquired at the trade deadline (Bouw and Leo)
- Lot's of players pass through waivers, doesn't change contract value, not even sure if this is admissible in an arbitration hearing.
- unlikely to be admissible
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 03:09 AM   #177
Zevo
First Line Centre
 
Zevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FAN View Post
I pretty much missed today's events. Can anyone tell me why Feaster didn't just pick Russell up on waivers? It is my understanding that Russell was on waivers like 3 days ago. Is this unnecessary waste of a draft pick or am I missing something here?

Edit: okay it was to avoid inheriting an arbitration case. Still not understanding it. Can anyone explain it to me?
If he claimed him of waivers, it could go to arbitration which the Flames would not be able to walk away from, no matter what the player was awarded. With a trade and sign, arbitration was not an option.
Zevo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 03:38 AM   #178
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

BTW I found this cool article

http://www.anguscertified.com/a-behi...ation-process/

Basically it summarizes the experience of a guy who does a mock NHL salary arbitration against Brian Burke... really cool. Was done in June of this year so I believe they follow the current CBA.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 07-06-2013, 06:27 AM   #179
FAN
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zevo View Post
If he claimed him of waivers, it could go to arbitration which the Flames would not be able to walk away from, no matter what the player was awarded. With a trade and sign, arbitration was not an option.
I don't understand the logic behind this. Since Russell agreed to a sign and trade, wouldn't he agree to a $1.5M contract or similar and avoid arbitration? I'm sure this has been discussed, how much can Russell realistically get from arbitration? A 5th round pick to avoid the risk of arbitration seems stupid given that the team likely will end up with plenty of unused cap room.
FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 06:59 AM   #180
toquester
First Line Centre
 
toquester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatter View Post
I like the trade and signing.

I was fortunate to watch Russell throughout his junior career with the Tigers. Obviously he will never be a top pairing guy or replicate his gaudy junior stats (32 goals in his last junior season!) in the NHL, but he has other qualities that are desirable for the Flames.

Foremost, he is a gamer. Kris plays hard every night, partially because he has to work harder to overcome his stature, but also because he has a great attitude.

Secondly, he thinks the game very well on both ends of the ice, especially in the offensive zone. His troubles in his own end mostly stem from physical mismatches, not from poor positioning, a poor brain, or poor skating.

This is a no risk signing and I'm ecstatic. I think he has a ton more to show at this level.
I am excited about this pick up too. He is excited about coming home, he is on a cheap, short term contract so he will be motivated, and he is a much better player than he has been portrayed around here.

Here are quotes from scouts quoted by HF:

"Scout #1: If there’s a little guy that’s ever going to play, he’s the one. The nights he’s playing he can control a game, it goes at whatever speed he wants to play it. I see him blocking shots and coming back and doing a great job of taking on guys in front of the net that are twice his size and he does it along the boards, in the corners and he’ll fight too. If he was 25 pounds heavier you’d be fighting to get him and still I think he’s going to go pretty high.

Scout #2: He’s only 160 pounds but he plays like he’s 200 lbs. He thinks the game, he’s aggressive and he has great hockey sense. It’s tough to guess where he’s going to go in the draft because of his size but if he were 6’0 tall he’d be a definite first rounder. He certainly has the ability to be a good player and from the skill and heart standpoint he has all the attributes to be an NHL player but it’s tough to project where he’s going to fit in at the NHL level."

Granted, that was years ago but I would say being given a chance at a fresh start in a hometown Alberta player is well worth the risk. I really like Cundari but if this guy turns things around and plays the way he used to, he could be an upgrade.

Last edited by toquester; 07-06-2013 at 07:03 AM.
toquester is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to toquester For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:59 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy