[GDT] The 2013 NHL Entry Draft (1pm MT TSN)

[Erick Estrada]

Originally Posted by Frank MetaMusil

You never get pleasure from anything the Flames do man.

I dunno. I liked picks 6 and 28. I don't hate the 22 pick but going off the board in this deep of a 1st round is a little scary because it means that either the Flames know something everyone else doesn't or the Flames are being the Flames. I do remebmer the Morris pick being off the board and that worked out so hopefully Poirier proves them right.

[dammage79]

Jealous the Champs get a kid like Hartman. Nice pick.

[Ashasx]

I would like to trade a roster player for a 2nd round pick any time now.

Get me some McCoshen.

[kyuss275]

Originally Posted by Frank MetaMusil

You never get pleasure from anything the Flames do man.

I like a ll 3 picks but i agree with "Estrada". It's becoming more and more noticeable that if you don't "toe the company line" you are told to shut up.

[Hockey_Ninja]

Chicago got a steal.

[MrMastodonFarm]

Originally Posted by Erick Estrada

I dunno. I liked picks 6 and 28. I don't hate the 22 pick but going off the board in this deep of a 1st round is a little scary because it means that either the Flames know something everyone else doesn't or the Flames are being the Flames. I do remebmer the Morris pick being off the board and that worked out so hopefully Poirier proves them right.

It's not just the first round that is deep, it goes into the 2nd round as well. Guys in the 2nd round are potential 1st rounders etc.

[Niemo]

Adam Erne PLEASE!

[FlamingLonghorn]

Originally Posted by Erick Estrada

I dunno. I liked picks 6 and 28. I don't hate the 22 pick but going off the board in this deep of a 1st round is a little scary because it means that either the Flames know something everyone else doesn't or the Flames are being the Flames. I do remebmer the Morris pick being off the board and that worked out so hopefully Poirier proves them right.

Well the 28th pick was "ranked" higher than the 22nd. Pretty obvious they thought Poirier had a better chance of going before 28th then Klimchuk did.

[redforever]

Originally Posted by Erick Estrada

The criticism of perceived overreactions are even worse as it turns the place into a big argue fest.

Perceived? I don't think so.

[bucksmasher]

Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary

on the plus side, watching Shinkaruk vs Poirer will give both sides endless entertainment for years to come...

for the win

[JiriHrdina]

Originally Posted by kyuss275

I like a ll 3 picks but i agree with "Estrada". It's becoming more and more noticeable that if you don't "toe the company line" you are told to shut up.

No ones telling anyone to shut up. People are free to post their opinions and when they do they should expect others to disagree. Where has anyone been told to shut up?

[trackercowe]

Damn really wanted Hartman. Rich just got richer.

[Frank MetaMusil]

Originally Posted by Erick Estrada

I dunno. I liked picks 6 and 28. I don't hate the 22 pick but going off the board in this deep of a 1st round is a little scary because it means that either the Flames know something everyone else doesn't or the Flames are being the Flames. I do remebmer the Morris pick being off the board and that worked out so hopefully Poirier proves them right.

Every draft for the Flames is scary. At least they haven't gripped up a Keetley/Irving/Krahn yet.

You just seem so critical of guys that haven't even suited up yet. Monahan > Horvat, even if it was just 3 positions later.

Continue to voice opinon though, sorry if I stifled any of that.

[nik-]

Originally Posted by JiriHrdina

No ones telling anyone to shut up. People are free to post their opinions and when they do they should expect others to disagree. Where has anyone been told to shut up?

No, but the mockery is getting a little ridiculous. It doesn't go the other way, we're treated like we're idiots for not trusting a management group that's done nothing.

[devo22]

Weak draft for the USHL. They had 6 first rounders last year, just 1 this year.

[Mr.Coffee]

Originally Posted by wingmaker

Feaster does exactly what he said he'd do: stick to the list compiled by the scouts and take BPA. And it isn't Feaster who made the list. It was his decision to trust his scouting staff, but every single interview of a Calgary brass or scout going into the draft said that they would focus on getting their list together and sticking to it. I suspect Feaster is being 100% honest that they took 3 players in their top 13. So everyone who disagrees is 100% entitled to wonder if other scouts know more than the Flames scouting staff, but you can't criticize the team for doing anything but what they said they would do.

That's fine and all and I do agree but it doesn't mean they couldnt have leveraged their "sleeper" pick to get another one later in the draft to drop a few spots... That's my issue.

[JiriHrdina]

Originally Posted by nik-

No, but the mockery is getting a little ridiculous. It doesn't go the other way, we're treated like we're idiots for not trusting a management group that's done nothing.

Oh come on. Both sides mock the other. Don't turn yourself into a victim b/c someone disagrees with you on a hockey board

[gargamel]

Originally Posted by wingmaker

Feaster does exactly what he said he'd do: stick to the list compiled by the scouts and take BPA. And it isn't Feaster who made the list. It was his decision to trust his scouting staff, but every single interview of a Calgary brass or scout going into the draft said that they would focus on getting their list together and sticking to it. I suspect Feaster is being 100% honest that they took 3 players in their top 13. So everyone who disagrees is 100% entitled to wonder if other scouts know more than the Flames scouting staff, but you can't criticize the team for doing anything but what they said they would do.

Agreed. We had jerseys ready with the names of each of our 3 picks, so I have to think we had them all rated very highly. Most of the teams toward the end of the round just had blank jerseys.

[kyuss275]

Originally Posted by JiriHrdina

No ones telling anyone to shut up. People are free to post their opinions and when they do they should expect others to disagree. Where has anyone been told to shut up?

Maybe i should have not said the words " shut up", but i would like to think you can get the drift of what i am saying.

[Erick Estrada]

Originally Posted by JiriHrdina

No ones telling anyone to shut up. People are free to post their opinions and when they do they should expect others to disagree. Where has anyone been told to shut up?

Well I would say ridiculed into being shut up yes.