Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-29-2013, 01:58 PM   #6541
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Why wasn't the draft held today? A nice Saturday draft?

Is that too much to ask?
It probably has to do with the 48 hour buyout window after the Finals.

If the Finals had gone 7 games, the Cup would have been awarded on Wednesday night, which would have meant the buyout window wouldn't have opened until last night. That would have meant that any team wanting to execute a compliance buyout would have put those players on waivers today at noon, and they would have cleared tomorrow at noon.

If the Draft was held today before those buyouts could occur, it would have impacted some teams ability to make trades at the Draft.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 01:58 PM   #6542
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
It's not like Nichushkin will be the only elite player available at our pick. I think the guys we're picking from are so close that if the Flames want they can pick by position.
Exactly
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 01:59 PM   #6543
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
It's not like Nichushkin will be the only elite player available at our pick. I think the guys we're picking from are so close that if the Flames want they can pick by position.
That's kind of the gist of a lot of us wanting to take the centers and not the winger.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 02:01 PM   #6544
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
One thing that really worries me with Monahan is that something around 44 of his 78 points came on the powerplay. Only 34 even-strength/shorthanded points.
Heard this mentioned a few times and don't understand the criticism...

Is it Monahan's fault that his team was so bad that they couldn't score 5 on 5?

I could understand if the team was scoring but he wasn't contributing, but that's not the case.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 02:12 PM   #6545
FBI
Franchise Player
 
FBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
Exp:
Default

What was the suspension for?
__________________
FBI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 02:13 PM   #6546
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FBI View Post
What was the suspension for?
Hitting from behind. Bad hit.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 02:13 PM   #6547
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FBI View Post
What was the suspension for?
Hit to the head.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 02:14 PM   #6548
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 02:17 PM   #6549
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
It's not like Nichushkin will be the only elite player available at our pick. I think the guys we're picking from are so close that if the Flames want they can pick by position.
All it takes is two wild card picks at 3, 4 or 5 for a player we hadn't counted on being available, being available.

If there is a player that is available at 6, that we thought wouldn't be, there could be a significant market of teams picking 7-15 who might really jump at the chance/mortgage the future in order to trade up to the #6 spot.

Might be able to get a really significant asset Plus another pick in the top 10 or 15, and still able to snag the player they wanted at #6.

I have a feeling much of the activity right now is trying to move up in the draft to snag a specific player targeted by a team that is not a consensus 3-15 selection. Could be much of the of what we were hearing about multiple interviews for different kids is an indication that teams have significant differences on which players should be going when. This would make sense with this draft being categorized as 'deep'. Players some teams have slated for the 2nd round are likely thought of as potential top 15 picks by other organizations.

Like Ottawa when they moved up from 18 to 15 mid draft after Karlsson was still available, and they had targeted him to go much sooner.

If Calgary snags a player in the top 10, it might be far more worthwhile to turn the late round picks into multiple 2nds.

Last edited by Flash Walken; 06-29-2013 at 02:25 PM.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 02:26 PM   #6550
RT14
First Line Centre
 
RT14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dead Rear, AB
Exp:
Default

After hearing that Canes beat writer on the Fan claiming with a fair amount of confidence the team would take Nichushkin IF he's still available at 5, it sure makes you wonder...is there a chance someone takes Nich top 4 and leaves Barkov at 5? Leaving the Canes at 5 who could very well have a Nurse or someone next on their list?

At that point, they may be more than willing to move down to 6 for small adder, or even take someone else and leave Barkov to us....would be unreal, but starting to sound like anything is possible at this point.
RT14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 02:30 PM   #6551
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Barkov won't be there at 6. Hope must be killed so it doesn't grow into heartbreak!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 02:38 PM   #6552
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Darren Haynes ‏@DarrenHaynes_CP 2h
It's sure looking like the #Flames will remain at No. 6. My take on why history suggests against taking Sean Monahan. http://flamesfrom80feet.blogspot.ca/
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-29-2013, 02:44 PM   #6553
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Darren Haynes ‏@DarrenHaynes_CP 2h
It's sure looking like the #Flames will remain at No. 6. My take on why history suggests against taking Sean Monahan. http://flamesfrom80feet.blogspot.ca/
I fail to see any point or argument in that article. He thinks there is risk because Monahan didn't paly in the playoffs.

Then he talks about the last 20 players in the same boat and to me, that list looks just fine.

I would be shocked if someone could demonstrate that that list would be significantly different from random vs other picks
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 02:47 PM   #6554
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
I fail to see any point or argument in that article. He thinks there is risk because Monahan didn't paly in the playoffs.

Then he talks about the last 20 players in the same boat and to me, that list looks just fine.

I would be shocked if someone could demonstrate that that list would be significantly different from random vs other picks
Hey, I'm just putting up what I heard from him on the Fan earlier. I don't agree or disagree really. Just one guys point of view thats out there.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 02:52 PM   #6555
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

and I was just commenting on the article.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 03:15 PM   #6556
Icon
Franchise Player
 
Icon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

If Monahans there and they don't take him... I'll be sad
Icon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 03:16 PM   #6557
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Darren Haynes ‏@DarrenHaynes_CP 2h
It's sure looking like the #Flames will remain at No. 6. My take on why history suggests against taking Sean Monahan. http://flamesfrom80feet.blogspot.ca/
Let's hope so. It sound like it's simply going to be too costly to move up.
Erick Estrada is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 03:23 PM   #6558
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
He was driving the bus in Ottawa. Monahan had 78 points. Ottawa scored 208 goals. So Monahan was in on 37.5% of Ottawa's offense and that was with missing 10 games due to suspension. Next highest scoring player on the team? 51 points. Pretty clear that Monahan was one of their sole offensive threats.

To compare Halifax scored 347 goals with Drouin scoring 105 points for 30% of his team's offense. MacKinnon had 75 points for 22% of his team's offense. That said MacKinnon did have an injury and both players missed a bit of time due to the World Juniors.

Lindholm had 30 points on Brynas who scored 123 goals. That is 24% of his team's offense that he was in on. But in a men's league so more impressive perhaps.

Barkov had 48 points on Tappara who scored 173 goals. That is 28% of his team's offense. Very impressive.
Nice post. i think his offense is underrated.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2013, 03:32 PM   #6559
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Fan 960 says the Flames were very impressed with Monahan in interviews. Steinberg says Conroy liked him a lot.

Main concern is leg strength.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-29-2013, 03:33 PM   #6560
Heavy Jack
Franchise Player
 
Heavy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Fan 960 says the Flames were very impressed with Monahan. Steinberg says Conroy liked him a lot.
Hoping they don't trade the 6th. Don't care about anything else really as long as we pick 6th.
Heavy Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:17 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy