Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Who should the Flames take at #28
Shea Theodore 11 4.89%
Ryan Hartman 64 28.44%
Andre Burakovsky 5 2.22%
Nic Petan 73 32.44%
Connor Hurley 3 1.33%
Madison Bowey 23 10.22%
Zach Fucale 15 6.67%
Keaton Thompson 0 0%
Steven Santini 3 1.33%
Mirco Mueller 16 7.11%
Ian McCoshen 12 5.33%
Voters: 225. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-21-2013, 08:18 AM   #1
JiriHrdina
I believe in the Pony Power
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default CP Mock: Poll for 28

Who should the Flames take?
JiriHrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 08:23 AM   #2
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

So many intriguing prospects still on the board. I'd be happy with Hartman, Bowey, Petan, Theodore, McCoshen at this spot.

I know he's small, but I went with Petan. Crazy numbers for a 17/18 year old, and if he were 3" taller he would go way higher than this IMO.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 08:32 AM   #3
Young One
Draft Pick
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Default

Where is Bill Bumface?
Generational talent.
Young One is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Young One For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2013, 08:35 AM   #4
handgroen
First Line Centre
 
handgroen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

voted Petan, with so many picks in the first round, i don't mind swinging for the fences
__________________


is your cat doing singing?
handgroen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 08:36 AM   #5
IgiTang
Self-Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Exp:
Default

Nic Petan was really underappreciated this year imo. The kid is a gamer with some good vision and skill. Easy pick for me.
IgiTang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 08:45 AM   #6
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I went with Hartman, but I was was close to taking Petan. I'd be happy with either.

I have to admit, my only knowledge of either is based on what people here have been saying about them.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 08:46 AM   #7
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Went with Petan. Yeah he's small but he looks too good to pass on. Besides, the last two guys we drafted from Portland seem to be turning out nicely.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 08:48 AM   #8
Trailer Fire
First Line Centre
 
Trailer Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Armpit of BC: Trail
Exp:
Default

I went with Meuller. Sizeable 2-way defenceman.
__________________
Disregard any and all THANKS I give. I'm a dirty, dirty thanks-whore.
Trailer Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 08:58 AM   #9
Prufrock
Scoring Winger
 
Prufrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

I couldn't decide between Petan and McCoshen, but ended up going with McCoshen. Big, steady, solid skating defenceman, projected 2nd pairing with potential for 1st pairing in the right circumstance. I've liked what I've been reading about this kid.
__________________
You look like I need a drink
Prufrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 09:27 AM   #10
icarus
Franchise Player
 
icarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Singapore
Exp:
Default

Well I drafted by position for D because no one blew me away as BPA, there are a lot of good players here.

Of the blueliners available, I like Madison Bowey here the best. Sounds like a player to me with excellent skating and comes from Kelowna which knows how to develop defencemen.
__________________
Shot down in Flames!

Last edited by icarus; 06-21-2013 at 09:30 AM.
icarus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 09:35 AM   #11
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

The Flames clearly need a 4th pick in the 1st round.
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 09:45 AM   #12
timbit
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Exp:
Default

I think Thomas Vannelli a HS D from Minn will be a first rounder....ahead of Bowey and McCoshen.
timbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 09:55 AM   #13
Jack
Backup Goalie
 
Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

I went with Santini as I think he could turn into a dominant shut down beast. He may not be the sexiest pick, but he could turn out to be the type of guy who plays 20+ tough minutes a night against the other team's best players.

He is a very good skater, rarely makes mistakes under pressure and likes to clear the crease. He is also 6'1 and 210 pounds, which is decent size. He may actually be one of the more NHL ready defensemen.

(Looks like I'm the only one who likes him at this slot)

My second pick: Hartman - Heart and soul competitor who plays a 200 foot game. Apparently, he had a shoulder injury for the second half of the season and still put up good numbers (He is also one of the older players in the draft). I think he may have decent offensive potential though and the other facets of his game are very good.

Third pick: Bowey - By all accounts, he is a very good puck handler and distributor who is well rounded. I like his upside

Petan - really? This is a guy who will disappear in the playoffs. Don't get me wrong, I love the small guys and I will get behind any Flames pick. However, I have a hard time believing he will be an impact player in the post season.
__________________
"What's more dangerous - playing in NHL or covering Cup final in VAN?" - Bob McKenizie
Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jack For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2013, 10:11 AM   #14
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Went with Mueller.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2013, 12:35 PM   #15
snipetype
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Petan? really? wow? a cherry picking slow midget is a terrible pick.. we need 2 way players, McCoshen or maybe Mueller have much higher NHL potential. We don't need scoring wingers.. we were last in defence last year werent we? I could see hartman because he has a very complete game, but to Petan watch the guy play, yuck. its hilarious how much of a bias there is towards forwards on CP.
snipetype is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 12:36 PM   #16
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

I just don't think the Flames will use all three first rounders for forwards. Ian McCoshen seems like a prototypical Weisbrod pick, I wouldn't be surprised if we took him at 28.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to devo22 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2013, 12:52 PM   #17
Fire
Franchise Player
 
Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snipetype View Post
Petan? really? wow? a cherry picking slow midget is a terrible pick.. we need 2 way players, McCoshen or maybe Mueller have much higher NHL potential. We don't need scoring wingers.. we were last in defence last year werent we? I could see hartman because he has a very complete game, but to Petan watch the guy play, yuck. its hilarious how much of a bias there is towards forwards on CP.
To be fair, I think most people picked Petan because that is one of the few recognizable names. I know that is why I picked him.
__________________

Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 01:10 PM   #18
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
To be fair, I think most people picked Petan because that is one of the few recognizable names. I know that is why I picked him.

I think a lot of posters will pick Petan because it has been noted that he is high on the flames list. If he is available at #28 pretty good chance the flames take him.

For this draft since we already took 2 forwards, i am thinking D man. Can't decide between Bowey and McCoshen. McCoshen seems like the safer pick but Bowey's ceiling might be higher. Like them both.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 01:35 PM   #19
snipetype
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

McCoshen seems like a slam dunk at this point. Best draft eligible player from the USHL (Weisbrod and Feaster love their Yanks). Offensive flair, big 6'5" frame and a good skater. Would be shocked if he's not a first rounder. It addresses our size issue on the back end.

plus I think he's more of a home run swing type pick, (see Baertschi, Jankowski), that feaster and co seem to like. I like this philosophy on drafting. go with the high skill, high potential, less NHL ready guys.

Last edited by snipetype; 06-21-2013 at 01:38 PM.
snipetype is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2013, 01:41 PM   #20
The Professor
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Between Hartman, Fucale, and Mueller for me. Since we went with size with the first two, I'd be ok taking Hartman. Seems like he's got lots of hart.
The Professor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:02 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy