Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-19-2013, 07:23 PM   #21
Pierre "Monster" McGuire
Franchise Player
 
Pierre "Monster" McGuire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Abbotsford, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda View Post
I really want them to start looking at blocked shots. It's so frustrating to watch as as a fan when it seems like 90% of all pucks shot at the net get blocked. I'd be up for banning the sprawling dives and instead only allow players to go down to one knee
I'll respectfully disagree.

As a fan, nothing shows a players dedication like blocking a 90-100 mph shot for his team. It's exciting to watch, IMO.
Pierre "Monster" McGuire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 07:27 PM   #22
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre "Monster" McGuire View Post
I'll respectfully disagree.

As a fan, nothing shows a players dedication like blocking a 90-100 mph shot for his team. It's exciting to watch, IMO.
I agree. Although I would be fine if they outlawed the sliding blocked shot.
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 08:37 PM   #23
Hemi-Cuda
wins 10 internets
 
Hemi-Cuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: slightly to the left
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre "Monster" McGuire View Post
I'll respectfully disagree.

As a fan, nothing shows a players dedication like blocking a 90-100 mph shot for his team. It's exciting to watch, IMO.
But it takes no skill. IMO anytime you have a no skill play that nullifies a skill one, the league has to look at it
Hemi-Cuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 08:42 PM   #24
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulOfTheFlame View Post
More broken hands/fingers next season!
Better than broken skulls!
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 08:47 PM   #25
PIMking
Franchise Player
 
PIMking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Exp:
Default

so we will see how bad Louongo really sucks now! I bet Vancouver is wishing that they never signed that deal now
__________________
Thank you for everything CP. Good memories and thankful for everything that has been done to help me out. I will no longer take part on these boards. Take care, Go Flames Go.
PIMking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 08:55 PM   #26
Stillman16
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda View Post
But it takes no skill. IMO anytime you have a no skill play that nullifies a skill one, the league has to look at it
Disagree, takes skill and timing. You drop too fast, the player goes around you, and you're out of the play.....drop too slow and the puck goes under you, and you likely screened the shot (or worse tipped it).

Definetly takes skill to do it right! No to mention if you do it wrong, you'll likely get injured too.
Stillman16 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Stillman16 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2013, 08:21 AM   #27
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Just watching Sportscentre, and if I heard him right, good ole MacTavish figures that Sakic's comments about Jones are going to "garnish" a lot of attention.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2013, 08:33 AM   #28
GreenLantern
One of the Nine
 
GreenLantern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Sector 2814
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lazypucker View Post
It should be the other way around - if you want to fight, then take off your gloves and helmets..
I had to re read it about 5 times until I was able to comprehend what they meant.. I thought the other way around was a good rule, that way we have less hand injuries :P

I see where they are going with it.. but I still don't like it. The players should have a choice to remove their helmets and expose themselves.
__________________
"In brightest day, in blackest night / No evil shall escape my sight / Let those who worship evil's might / Beware my power, Green Lantern's light!"
GreenLantern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 08:35 AM   #29
GreenLantern
One of the Nine
 
GreenLantern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Sector 2814
Exp:
Default






__________________
"In brightest day, in blackest night / No evil shall escape my sight / Let those who worship evil's might / Beware my power, Green Lantern's light!"
GreenLantern is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to GreenLantern For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2013, 09:00 AM   #30
WilderPegasus
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
We have just witnessed the end of fighting in the NHL if the BOG approves this. With mandatory visors coming in and not allowing fighters to take off their helmets we will see virtually no fighting in 10 years.

I believe fighting has a place in the game, end of an era.
With what we know about concussions these days I've got no problem with fighting being out of the game. I don't consider a hockey game a good game based upon the number of fights that happened in it.

It was easier to make an argument that fighting was necessary to eliminate the cheap stuff when we thought that no one got seriously hurt during fights. But now we know that isn't true.
WilderPegasus is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to WilderPegasus For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2013, 09:05 AM   #31
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fire View Post
We have just witnessed the end of fighting in the NHL if the BOG approves this. With mandatory visors coming in and not allowing fighters to take off their helmets we will see virtually no fighting in 10 years.
Doubt it... I figure all this does is eventually make the two minutes after a fight 4-on-4 play (for the coinsidential minors when both guys remove their helmets).
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2013, 09:13 AM   #32
calumniate
Franchise Player
 
calumniate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: A small painted room
Exp:
Default

Well I suppose if both players take their helmets off, they offset. Not sure how effective this rule will be
calumniate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 09:16 AM   #33
Hack&Lube
Atomic Nerd
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I guess the helmet rule makes sense if we are talking about protecting players from concussions from fights or from heads slamming into the ice during/after fights.
Hack&Lube is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 10:23 AM   #34
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
Better than broken skulls!
This has never happened, as far as I know, from a punch in a hockey fight. Broken facial bones, check. Possibly a fracture from the head hitting the ice on a take down, yup. Skull fracture from a punch, never heard of it.

Way more serious injuries come from shots than fighting has ever produced. Time to outlaw composite sticks. :P
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 10:24 AM   #35
Locke
Franchise Player
 
Locke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern View Post





Thats what you get for an MBA these days...
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!

This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.

The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans

If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
Locke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 10:26 AM   #36
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern View Post





I sense a new Oilers meme...
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 10:32 AM   #37
Hemi-Cuda
wins 10 internets
 
Hemi-Cuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: slightly to the left
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hack&Lube View Post
I guess the helmet rule makes sense if we are talking about protecting players from concussions from fights or from heads slamming into the ice during/after fights.
If this is the reasoning, then why allow fighting at all? It's unnecessary blows to the head, of course there will be concussions
Hemi-Cuda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 10:45 AM   #38
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre "Monster" McGuire View Post
Anything on how to curb diving and embellishing?

I have a suggestion. It's either a diving penalty or a tripping penalty, not both. If it's diving, hit them with a $5000 fine.

Broke ass Burrows.
I was wondering this, too. It's my #1 issue in the NHL today, dives and embellishments are out of control and it's making the product on the ice suffer.

It seems like every time a player thinks there's an infraction they either fall down or grab their face and then immediately look at the refs. Last night was a good example......Horton took a stick near the eye and kep playing, which is rare to see and also honourable. A few minutes later Keith got hit, went down, grabbed his face then looked at the ref. That's the kind of garbage I want to see out of the game. Enough is enough.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2013, 10:47 AM   #39
indes
First Line Centre
 
indes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hack&Lube View Post
I guess the helmet rule makes sense if we are talking about protecting players from concussions from fights or from heads slamming into the ice during/after fights.
Where do you draw the line though? Foam pucks and rubber padded sticks? These guys both know and accept the risks that com with dropping the mitts. It's not the players that want this.
indes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 04:21 PM   #40
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

If both guys agree and take their helmets off they both get an extra 2 minutes, so it's pointless really.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:20 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy