Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-18-2013, 04:37 PM   #3141
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Report: Coyotes, Dave Tippett agree to contract pending sale of the team


http://arizonasports.com/?sid=1642947&nid=43
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 12:01 AM   #3142
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

@PaulGiblinAriz: #Glendale's attorney says city staff will continue talks with #Renaissance. This is certain: There wasn't instant love for the proposal.

@PaulGiblinAriz: #Glendale Councilman Manny Martinez said a vote concerning #Coyotes by June 25 is unlikely. How's that sit with #Renaissance and the #NHL?
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 08:54 AM   #3143
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Coyotes suitor’s pitch fails to excite

Glendale council members measured in response to Renaissance briefing


http://www.azcentral.com/community/g...ls-excite.html

A long-awaited proposal by the prospective owners of the Phoenix Coyotes intended to keep the team in Arizona generated a mostly lackluster response by the Glendale City Council on Tuesday evening.

One council member left the closed-door briefing early, saying prospective Coyotes owner Renaissance Sports & Entertainment was getting preferential treatment by her colleagues.

“I couldn’t take it anymore,” Councilwoman Norma Alvarez said as she made an early departure from the executive session.

“I’m sorry, but I’m not for the Coyotes,” said Alvarez, who is a longtime opponent of public spending for professional sports.

After the meeting ended, some council members said additional negotiations will be needed before the council will be ready to vote on the matter.

Before the meeting, Councilman Gary Sherwood said he anticipated Renaissance would ask for far more than $6 million a year, but that Renaissance would be willing to share some revenue with the city.

Afterward, Sherwood declined to discuss specific points, but said he’s optimistic that a deal can be reached. There’s one major sticking component to the proposal, but it probably can be addressed, he said.

Martinez said the council will likely not vote on the matter during its next scheduled voting meeting on Tuesday. All the council members have questions about the proposal, he said.

Mayor Jerry Weiers said, “There’s been no decision made by the council, so right now, that’s all I can tell you.”

Acting City Attorney Nicholas DiPiazza said city staff members will continue to negotiate with Renaissance. “This is still a very fluid situation,” he said. “I think an agreement can be reached very shortly or perhaps not.”
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 08:58 AM   #3144
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Glendale council offers little information on lease proposal
http://www.foxsportsarizona.com/nhl/...03&feedID=3702

Mayor Jerry Weiers had no comment, while Vice Mayor Yvonne Knaack and councilmembers Sam Chavira and Ian Hugh did not address the media. Councilmember Norma Alvarez left early, accusing RSE of getting preferential treatment, and we’re not exactly sure what councilmember Manny Martinez meant when he said he didn’t anticipate any decisions being made by the council’s June 25 session.

The only one who spoke at length was Gary Sherwood. When reached afterward by phone, here’s how he characterized the session.

"What I thought would happen, happened," Sherwood said. "When you go through some of the deal points, I thought there would be a hang up or two, and there were.

"But I think they are easily overcome, and I think there will be another meeting this week. I’m optimistic because I think that what we need to do is pretty simplistic and it’s easily doable."

When asked about a timeline for a vote on RSE's proposal, Sherwood said: "I’m optimistic we'll get it done and hopefully it can be vetted by the public next week. We have a place for a vote on (June) 28th or it may drop into the week after. A lot will depend on whenever the next meeting is called."

It's unclear whether that timeline will work for the NHL, whose Board of Governor's meeting is scheduled for June 27.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 09:02 AM   #3145
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Joyce Clark:

http://joyceclarkunfiltered.com/coun...r-opens-crack/

From various statements made to the media by the City Attorney and some councilmembers there will be no vote on the Coyotes deal on June 25th. So look for June 28th or July 9th. However, Council has a vacation break in July so it makes more sense for it to become an agenda item at the specially called meeting for June 28th.

We know council was briefed on the PAD and SMG bids and council probably learned their asking price to manage the arena. It probably made Councilmember Alvarez’ heart beat faster and I imagine she offered an impassioned but hardly eloquent plea for acceptance of one of them. We know another topic of discussion was the Renaissance Sports and Entertainment (RSE) bid. Councilmember Sherwood publicly admitted that there were deal points that caused council difficulty. I would think the city’s guarantee of $15M (or X number—you fill in the blank) a year without any guarantee that there would really be the elusive $8M-$11M in enhanced revenue going to the city could have been a stumbling block. Whatever the issues were, council would have given direction to staff to go back to RSE and renegotiate those deal points. The ball in now in RSE’s court. If RSE is serious, it will have to make further concessions that demonstrate their skin in the game. Councilmember Sherwood also publicly acknowledged that the deal points need to be publicized one week before the vote. I applaud council for their stance on the side of reasonable and prudent public disclosure.

Councilmember Alvarez walked out of Esession in disgust, complaining that council was making “too many concessions” to RSE. The mere idea of entertaining the RSE bid is a “concession” in Alvarez’ mind. One other Alvarezism from the open meeting springs to mind. While discussing putting public comments at the beginning of the meeting she virtually accused her fellow councilmembers of not championing Democracy and the American Way by accusatorily saying, “We’re not dictators.”
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 11:32 AM   #3146
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Craig Morgan ‏@cmorganfoxaz
Hearing Glendale City Council will hold another exec session Friday for further discussion on the http://Jobing.com Arena lease bids.

Craig Morgan ‏@cmorganfoxaz
Glendale City Council vote unlikely for June 25th, but June 28 & July 2 remain possibilities.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 12:40 PM   #3147
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Blogger speculates (with reasons) on COG vote:

http://www.sonicsrising.com/2013/6/1...en-in-glendale

I've categorized four jurists as leaning toward a no vote and three as almost certain yes votes.

Weiers = no
Knaack = yes
Martinez = yes
Alvarez = no
Sherwood = yes
Chavira = no
Hugh = no

Joyce Clark has suggested she would vote no too.

Last edited by troutman; 06-19-2013 at 12:44 PM.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 12:58 PM   #3148
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

This pretty much looks like a giant game of chicken at this point, but in either case, Glendale is going to lose.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 02:07 PM   #3149
landshark
Powerplay Quarterback
 
landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
This pretty much looks like a giant game of chicken at this point, but in either case, Glendale is going to lose.
Seems to me that's how the nhl negotiates these days - pure brinkmanship...

vs the NHLPA

vs the Olympic committee

and vs Glendale

take it all the way to the very, very end
landshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2013, 02:32 PM   #3150
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by landshark View Post
Seems to me that's how the nhl negotiates these days - pure brinkmanship...

vs the NHLPA

vs the Olympic committee

and vs Glendale

take it all the way to the very, very end
I'm not sure how else they were supposed to negotiate with the NHLPA, I don't recall Fehr being incredibly flexible. The same goes for the IOC, an agency that wants to reap rewards without giving up anything in return. I'm not sure you can fairly label Glendale as brinkmanship when there have been multiple near deals, or at least attempts at deals, over the last few years with the NHL remaining in the market despite them falling through.
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to valo403 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-19-2013, 09:39 PM   #3151
Sidney Crosby's Hat
Franchise Player
 
Sidney Crosby's Hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
I'm not sure how else they were supposed to negotiate with the NHLPA, I don't recall Fehr being incredibly flexible. The same goes for the IOC, an agency that wants to reap rewards without giving up anything in return. I'm not sure you can fairly label Glendale as brinkmanship when there have been multiple near deals, or at least attempts at deals, over the last few years with the NHL remaining in the market despite them falling through.
Not to mention, the NHLPA is right behind the NHL when it comes to the Olympic deal. Some things need to be resolved there, like the fact that in 2010 non-rightsholder media didn't even get access to players.
Sidney Crosby's Hat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 04:19 AM   #3152
Tsawwassen
Franchise Player
 
Tsawwassen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sidney Crosby's Hat View Post
Not to mention, the NHLPA is right behind the NHL when it comes to the Olympic deal. Some things need to be resolved there, like the fact that in 2010 non-rightsholder media didn't even get access to players.
Yep, that was a mess back then. I remember Bettman on a radio interview during the games talking about this and how he and the PA were just guests and couldn't do much else.
__________________
Remember this, TSN stands for Toronto's Sports Network!
MOD EDIT: Removed broken image link.
Tsawwassen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 09:35 AM   #3153
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Phoenix Coyotes sale: Progress made, but clock ticks


http://www.sportingnews.com/nhl/stor...-entertainment

The ownership group trying to buy the Phoenix Coyotes and keep them in Glendale believes it is addressing city concerns about an arena deal.

But if Renaissance Sports & Entertainment and the city of Glendale cannot come to terms on arena management payments by Friday, the NHL may pull the plug on the deal and the team’s future in Arizona.

“The thing is, if there’s not some sort of framework in place for a deal by Friday, you have to imagine the NHL will pull the plug. This can’t continue to drag on into July,” said an executive working close to the deal.

“The clock is really ticking here,” the executive said. “The good news is, it seems they’re down to tweaking the deal, making some minor refinements. It appears Renaissance has met the City’s main objective—to create enough revenue that this deal works for both sides.”

The source also pointed out that Renaissance executives believe their deal is better for the city than past Coyotes pacts.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 10:10 AM   #3154
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

The groundwork for an agreement is in place, there will be give and take on the minor issues.

Vote is July 2nd.
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 10:33 AM   #3155
Hemi-Cuda
wins 10 internets
 
Hemi-Cuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: slightly to the left
Exp:
Default

Every time I come into this thread, I feel like Bill Murray in Groundhog Day
Hemi-Cuda is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Hemi-Cuda For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2013, 10:35 AM   #3156
PegCityFlamesFan
First Line Centre
 
PegCityFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

I just keep wondering if Bouw and Arrow copies and pastes his previous posts with new dates.
__________________
PegCityFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PegCityFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
Old 06-20-2013, 11:06 AM   #3157
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda View Post
Every time I come into this thread, I feel like Bill Murray in Groundhog Day
And on the radio in Phoenix, Sonny and Cher are singing, 'I got screwed, babe.'
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 11:57 AM   #3158
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

@PaulGiblinAriz: #Glendale has scheduled another #Coyotes meeting for Friday, but it's a closed-door meeting, which means no voting, so no final decision.

@PaulGiblinAriz: @ggerodimos #Glendale officials did not know the details of Renaissance's complicated plan that would exchange millions between the sides.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 12:18 PM   #3159
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
Blogger speculates (with reasons) on COG vote:

http://www.sonicsrising.com/2013/6/1...en-in-glendale

I've categorized four jurists as leaning toward a no vote and three as almost certain yes votes.

Weiers = no
Knaack = yes
Martinez = yes
Alvarez = no
Sherwood = yes
Chavira = no
Hugh = no

Joyce Clark has suggested she would vote no too.
Weiers will 100% be a yes. His public facing comments are extremely conservative about caring about the Coyotes, he goes to every game! It's all politics. He will be a yes Vote in the end. He is actually pretty open to this process and the league and prospective buyers have worked well with him thus far. (The NHL vetting an ownership group before approaching council was his #1 request) and that's just what the league did.

That is 4.

Last edited by Jordan!; 06-20-2013 at 12:21 PM.
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 01:09 PM   #3160
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouw N Arrow View Post
Weiers will 100% be a yes. His public facing comments are extremely conservative about caring about the Coyotes, he goes to every game! It's all politics. He will be a yes Vote in the end. He is actually pretty open to this process and the league and prospective buyers have worked well with him thus far. (The NHL vetting an ownership group before approaching council was his #1 request) and that's just what the league did.

That is 4.
I guess we'll see, but the fact that he goes to games isn't really determinative. If it's all politics it will come down to his views on how the city spends its money, and how his vote will be used for or against him politically in the future, not whether or not he's a big Shane doan fan.
__________________
When you do a signature and don't attribute it to anyone, it's yours. - Vulcan
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:11 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy