Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-12-2013, 01:07 PM   #21
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

I don't see why there is such backlash from people. The guy just took his team to the conference final, where the PLAYERS crapped the bed. Why is there no talk of shipping out Crosby, Letang or Malkin when THEY are the ones who didn't show up? Does anyone really think that hiring a new coach for a team that just made the final 4 will really push them over the edge?

The fact is, Bylsma plays a system that caters to the teams' strengths. Other then round 3, the team was dominant all season long. Why change the system when it clearly works?

Firing Bylsma IMO would have been a huge mistake. It's not his fault his core of superstars thought they could coast against Boston.
Huntingwhale is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 01:27 PM   #22
Miniac
#1 Goaltender
 
Miniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth Australia
Exp:
Default

^^^
Easier to fire Bylsma than shipping out Crosby, Letang or Malkin...
But at the end of the day Bylsma gets a 2nd chance.
Miniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 01:50 PM   #23
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huntingwhale View Post
I don't see why there is such backlash from people. The guy just took his team to the conference final, where the PLAYERS crapped the bed. Why is there no talk of shipping out Crosby, Letang or Malkin when THEY are the ones who didn't show up? Does anyone really think that hiring a new coach for a team that just made the final 4 will really push them over the edge?

The fact is, Bylsma plays a system that caters to the teams' strengths. Other then round 3, the team was dominant all season long. Why change the system when it clearly works?

Firing Bylsma IMO would have been a huge mistake. It's not his fault his core of superstars thought they could coast against Boston.
Well, you either blame the players for not showing up or you blame the coach for not getting the players to show up. Considering the moves the Pens made to stack their team, anything short of winning the cup is going to be a big disappointment.

Also, making it to the ECF was not really all that impressive for the Pens. All they had to do was beat the #8 and then #7 ranked teams in the conference. And truthfully, if Vokoun hadn't stepped in and picked the team up I am not convinced that the Pens would have made it out of the first round.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 02:20 PM   #24
Jake
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Exp:
Default

Fleury obviously needs to go, but I agree with keeping Bylsma. I don't think you should fire a coach that got you to the conference finals, even if they had a terrible showing in them. He deserves another chance, just like a couple of the Flames coaches probably did back when we were respectable.
Jake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 02:20 PM   #25
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huntingwhale View Post
I don't see why there is such backlash from people. The guy just took his team to the conference final, where the PLAYERS crapped the bed. Why is there no talk of shipping out Crosby, Letang or Malkin when THEY are the ones who didn't show up? Does anyone really think that hiring a new coach for a team that just made the final 4 will really push them over the edge?

The fact is, Bylsma plays a system that caters to the teams' strengths. Other then round 3, the team was dominant all season long. Why change the system when it clearly works?

Firing Bylsma IMO would have been a huge mistake. It's not his fault his core of superstars thought they could coast against Boston.
Had a difficult series with the #8 seed Islanders and beat the # 7 seed Senators that were injury riddled and overachievers just to get to the playoffs. Not very impressive when you consider how they got steamrolled by the only cup contender they faced.

I can't expect that Blysma survives either an early playoff exit or another conference final exit where they get embaressed. May be tough to do if they don't do something about the goaltending situation.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 06-12-2013, 02:41 PM   #26
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Iggy needs to get out of their. ASAP.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 02:48 PM   #27
Phanuthier
Franchise Player
 
Phanuthier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silicon Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja View Post
Iggy needs to get out of their. ASAP.
lol just like he needed to get out of here ASAP?

Blysma mis-used him, just like Babcock also mis-used him?
__________________
"With a coach and a player, sometimes there's just so much respect there that it's boils over"
-Taylor Hall
Phanuthier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 02:50 PM   #28
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phanuthier View Post
lol just like he needed to get out of here ASAP?

Blysma mis-used him, just like Babcock also mis-used him?
Blysma did misuse him vs the Bruins. Yeah he didn't play well but he could have at least put him with Crosby to see if they could get it going. I'm sure Iggy will stay but i have a feeling it's going to end up the same as this year next season.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 04:46 PM   #29
CSharp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

All that talent on one team and not even a conference final championship once since he won the cup as a rookie head coach. That was his fluke one time shot and he made the best of it. He'll be fired at the end of next season after the Pens get trounced again. Everyone should know how to play them now. Heck, even the Islanders almost beat them in the first round, for crying out loud!
CSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 04:53 PM   #30
trackercowe
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

Told ya'll he wasn't going anywhere. Stanley cup winning coaches are incredibly hard to fire. I can only think of a few recent coaches who've won the cup that aren't a head coach somewhere currently (Crawford and maybe the Devils' coaches being the only ones).
trackercowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 05:03 PM   #31
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

The fastest way to turn a contender into a tenth place team is to make drastic moves every time you have a bad playoff series. The regular season is a much better gauge of the team. Playoffs sample sizes are too small. People read way too many patterns into a quick playoff exit or even a couple when really a bad bounce in a game or two, a hot goalie or a bad matchup is the difference between a cup and a first round exit. Good on Pittsburgh for not over reacting.
nfotiu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 05:20 PM   #32
CSharp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huntingwhale View Post
I don't see why there is such backlash from people. The guy just took his team to the conference final, where the PLAYERS crapped the bed. Why is there no talk of shipping out Crosby, Letang or Malkin when THEY are the ones who didn't show up? Does anyone really think that hiring a new coach for a team that just made the final 4 will really push them over the edge?

The fact is, Bylsma plays a system that caters to the teams' strengths. Other then round 3, the team was dominant all season long. Why change the system when it clearly works?

Firing Bylsma IMO would have been a huge mistake. It's not his fault his core of superstars thought they could coast against Boston.
Crosby and Malkin showed up, but they were double and triple shadowed through that conference finals series. Instead of putting the right people to on the lines with the two superstars, Bylsma used players like Matt Cooke explicitly on the second line. Cooke didn't do anything but moved his mouth and gave the opposition the stupid stare. And notice that there was no fights and Crosby kept getting knocked down? The first two lines and the defensive core was running around scared most of the time. Crosby and Malkin, by 4th game is probably bruised and battered so bad that they had nothing left after Bylsma overused them to get something going. There were tougher guys in the lineup that could've help the Pens get through that series. Just that Bylsma didn't use them enough. Management saw from previous years that the Pens were not tough enough and that's what they went out to get during the trade deadline. But, Bylsma relied only on his two superstars to try and get to the Cup Finals.
CSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 05:31 PM   #33
CSharp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

I also think Crosby's prime days are over. If he's double covered like that and no line mate does their job, he's not gonna score very many goals. As well, being checked hard like that, I just think he might end up concussed earlier than later. If Pen's management is smart, they'd ship out Crosby for like 4 first round draft picks and start reloading now. Fire Bylsma and go with someone who knows how to match up lines. Bylsma is only lucky to get a cup because that Pen's team was gonna win it but they had no focus or drive before he got there. Sometimes a change of coaching does help to refocus a team. I think a guy like Tortorella would get them further, but then, it might go the other way as well. Imagine if Babcock was coaching that team? I also wondered if the Pens had better goalies in net for the start of the playoffs, would that make a difference? So, Bylsma did do one thing right by replacing Fluery with Vokoun in net - but both goalies look shaky.
CSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 05:37 PM   #34
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSharp View Post
I also think Crosby's prime days are over. If he's double covered like that and no line mate does their job, he's not gonna score very many goals. As well, being checked hard like that, I just think he might end up concussed earlier than later. If Pen's management is smart, they'd ship out Crosby for like 4 first round draft picks and start reloading now. Fire Bylsma and go with someone who knows how to match up lines. Bylsma is only lucky to get a cup because that Pen's team was gonna win it but they had no focus or drive before he got there. Sometimes a change of coaching does help to refocus a team. I think a guy like Tortorella would get them further, but then, it might go the other way as well. Imagine if Babcock was coaching that team? I also wondered if the Pens had better goalies in net for the start of the playoffs, would that make a difference? So, Bylsma did do one thing right by replacing Fluery with Vokoun in net - but both goalies look shaky.
You can't be serious? Even if they where dumb enough to do this i highly doubt any other team would want to take on a $8.7M contract up to 2025.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 06:03 PM   #35
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSharp View Post
I also think Crosby's prime days are over.
Just to be clear you are talking about the guy that badly outscored every other player in the league in terms of PPG and almost won the scoring title despite missing half the season and then put up the 3rd best PPG in the play-offs after coming back from a serious injury?

That is the guy who's prime days are over?

Sorry if I missed the obvious green text but it did seem somewhat serious.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
Old 06-12-2013, 06:07 PM   #36
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja View Post
You can't be serious? Even if they where dumb enough to do this i highly doubt any other team would want to take on a $8.7M contract up to 2025.
Calgary would take Crosby tomorrow for our first round picks in this draft. We would be stupid not to. So would every other team in the league. Calgary could raise ticket prices 20% the day Crosby arrived.

And how can pittsburgh be both dumb to do it meaning it would be a terrible deal, and it be an untradeable contract.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 06:09 PM   #37
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

There would be a rush of teams trying to find ways to fit that contract on their team.

You want to see a rush of buyouts, and possibly of guys that may even be useful, have Crosby on the market and teams will bend over backwards.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 06:27 PM   #38
sun
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Not cheering for losses
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja View Post
You can't be serious? Even if they where dumb enough to do this i highly doubt any other team would want to take on a $8.7M contract up to 2025.
Wait, PIT would be dumb to ship him out, but all other teams would be dumb to take him in?
sun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 06:34 PM   #39
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sun View Post
Wait, PIT would be dumb to ship him out, but all other teams would be dumb to take him in?
I didn't mean it like that. I was just saying that while landing Crosby would be incredible for any team there still are risks with adding his contract. Especially if he comes down with another bad concussion. Besides it's all pointless talking about this seeing he'll for sure be a Pen until the day he hangs them up.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 07:15 PM   #40
d_phaneuf
Franchise Player
 
d_phaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

a bit of overreaction to those comments about MAF

what do you expect him to say? we are moving him? buying him out?

these end of season GM PC's are treating like big revelations of news, but even a team planning massive changes won't say anyone is available
d_phaneuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:00 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy