Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-10-2013, 08:45 AM   #5281
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief View Post
I'd still like to see Cammi to CBJ for one of their 1sts. Also Gio to Philly for their first.

Come away with :
C - Sean Monahan (6th)
RW - Hunter Shinkaruk (11th)
LW - Alex Wennberg (19th)
RW - Kerby Rychel (24th)
C - JT Compher (28th)

Add ton of skill up front.

Then draft D from 3rd round on.

This seems too good to be true.. Especially with the Top 3 pick 2014 that is sure to follow... All hail King Feaster if he's able to pull this off.
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 08:47 AM   #5282
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlayfulGenius View Post
This seems too good to be true.. Especially with the Top 3 pick 2014 that is sure to follow... All hail King Feaster if he's able to pull this off.
The 2014 squad would be terrible without Gio and Cammi, Gio in particular. Let's not go full-oiler on this.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fighting Banana Slug For This Useful Post:
Old 06-10-2013, 08:54 AM   #5283
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

The key to not going 'full oiler' is to draft well...not to hang on to veteran players hat won't mean anything by the time the Flames contend again.

I'm perfectly ok with watching the Flames finish dead last next season, as long as the team is young...shows heart and effort every night...and improves over the course of the season.
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 09:01 AM   #5284
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlayfulGenius View Post
The key to not going 'full oiler' is to draft well...not to hang on to veteran players hat won't mean anything by the time the Flames contend again.

I'm perfectly ok with watching the Flames finish dead last next season, as long as the team is young...shows heart and effort every night...and improves over the course of the season.
Sure. But it doesn't look like the Flames brass shares your plan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 09:09 AM   #5285
mrdonkey
Franchise Player
 
mrdonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Sure. But it doesn't look like the Flames brass shares your plan.
What a surprise, Flames brass think they can cut corners and defy common knowledge, and as a result the team stays mediocre to bad.

It's almost like we've been enjoying the results of that plan for the last 20 odd years.
mrdonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 09:13 AM   #5286
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrdonkey View Post
What a surprise, Flames brass think they can cut corners and defy common knowledge, and as a result the team stays mediocre to bad.

It's almost like we've been enjoying the results of that plan for the last 20 odd years.
I don't think the right thing to do is go full Oiler either. That is a team that has losing and giving up built into their culture right now. Tanking on purpose is never the right move

Putting solid vets that want to be here with hungry young kids is the way the flames are going. That is not cutting corners it is doing it the right way
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 09:17 AM   #5287
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

I'm pretty sure the management knows we're a top 5 pick team next draft. With rookie goalies,young forwards, not much on D; they better know it and ship out vets that won't be needed. It's simple as that.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 09:20 AM   #5288
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Sure. But it doesn't look like the Flames brass shares your plan.
What are you basing that on?

I don't believe the Flame have tipped their hand yet with regards to potential moves made at the draft or heading into the UFA period.

You could be right, but we'll all just have to wait and see.
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 09:21 AM   #5289
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief View Post
I'm pretty sure the management knows we're a top 5 pick team next draft. With rookie goalies,young forwards, not much on D; they better know it and ship out vets that won't be needed. It's simple as that.
I agree...trying to fight against a bottom finish next season will ensure 'full oiler' IMO
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 09:24 AM   #5290
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

To me, full-oiler means have an entire roster of rushed draft picks or rookies with no veterans players who can actually play at the NHL level. I have no problem shipping out a veterans to open up spots to players who are actually ready, but I am not so sure we need to dump Cammi and Gio, even if we can pick up a decent pick.
Fighting Banana Slug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 09:41 AM   #5291
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug View Post
To me, full-oiler means have an entire roster of rushed draft picks or rookies with no veterans players who can actually play at the NHL level. I have no problem shipping out a veterans to open up spots to players who are actually ready, but I am not so sure we need to dump Cammi and Gio, even if we can pick up a decent pick.
If the Flames rush players along, that is a separate issue to moving Gio and Cammy...as those players can be replaced with UFAs if need be.
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 09:45 AM   #5292
FCAV
Scoring Winger
 
FCAV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

We've started our 'Scouts Series' at Future Considerations, where we have select scouts talk about who impressed and disappointed them throughout their viewings this season. It gives a good idea on which way certain players trended throughout the year.

The first here is Dan Shrader (upper-midwest):

http://futureconsiderations.ca/fcs-s...upper-midwest/
FCAV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to FCAV For This Useful Post:
Old 06-10-2013, 10:03 AM   #5293
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

i just hope the flames use the 3 firsts, and would be pleasantly surprised if they picked up a few more.

The fortunes of many teams changed in the epic draft of 03/04, and if this is supposed to be of the same caliber, let's hope we look back at this draft 5 years from now as the draft that created the flames strong foundations.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 10:06 AM   #5294
SHOGUN
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
This past season, Lindholm took just 67 faceoffs compared to 728, 663, 584, and 521 taken by the top four on his team.

He did win 58 percent of those faceoffs, however, best on the team for those taking more than 50 last season.
Took this from the Oilers forum... looks there's one reason why to take Monahan instead of Lindholm.
SHOGUN is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to SHOGUN For This Useful Post:
Old 06-10-2013, 11:16 AM   #5295
3 Justin 3
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: On my metal monster.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SHOGUN View Post
Took this from the Oilers forum... looks there's one reason why to take Monahan instead of Lindholm.
They played Lindholm on the wing (for the same reasons as Jankowski) so it would be an easier transition. He is a center.
3 Justin 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 12:09 PM   #5296
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlayfulGenius View Post
What are you basing that on?

I don't believe the Flame have tipped their hand yet with regards to potential moves made at the draft or heading into the UFA period.

You could be right, but we'll all just have to wait and see.
Moving Gio and Cammalleri in the off-season for picks and prospects would essentially be tanking next season. Nothing Flames management has said over the last six months suggests they want to undergo a ground-up rebuild. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised at all if they sign a veteran goalie, and a couple veterans forwards for big money.

But you're right - we'll see.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 12:23 PM   #5297
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

I think Gio is staying. Cammalleri I think will start the season but I would think he would be the number one guy on the flames targeted at the trade deadline, especially if they decide to take on salary.
Robbob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 12:24 PM   #5298
PlayfulGenius
Franchise Player
 
PlayfulGenius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Moving Gio and Cammalleri in the off-season for picks and prospects would essentially be tanking next season. Nothing Flames management has said over the last six months suggests they want to undergo a ground-up rebuild. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised at all if they sign a veteran goalie, and a couple veterans forwards for big money.

But you're right - we'll see.
Ya, I really hope your assessment is wrong. I don't like taking a half-ass approach to anything... Either rebuild or don't!!

Anyway, a really good indication will be to see if the Flames keep all 3 1st round picks...or whether they move one for a roster player.
PlayfulGenius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 12:25 PM   #5299
Stanley
First Line Centre
 
Stanley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

I have an idea!
How about we exclude our "unanimously voted" next captain out of any trade-for-more-picks scenarios...
Stanley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-2013, 02:46 PM   #5300
Bar-Down
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Bar-Down's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the 'Dome
Exp:
Default

New Mock Drafts from NHL.com (June 10, 2013)

Kimelman
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=673460
6 - C Sean Monahan
22 - D Ian McCoshen
28- G Eric Comrie

Morreale
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=673459
6 - D Darnell Nurse
22 - G Zach Fucale
28 - D Ian McCoshen


Hoffner
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=673461
6 - C Sean Monahan
22 - D Micro Mueller
28 - D Josh Morrissey
__________________

Last edited by Bar-Down; 06-10-2013 at 02:50 PM.
Bar-Down is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy