06-05-2013, 02:32 PM
|
#41
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Browndog71
I am not 100% sure, but I think that Feaster mentioned at the Tuesday night season ticket holder session that the way MacDonald's contract was structured, he would not have to clear waivers to be sent down.
|
How does that work?
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 02:34 PM
|
#42
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
I don't think that is possible. The NHLPA would never allow it.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 02:35 PM
|
#43
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
How does that work?
|
Given Feaster's understanding of waiver regulations(ROR), I wouldn't be surprised if he made a mistake
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jeffman For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-05-2013, 02:35 PM
|
#44
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
How does that work?
|
Based on the same principles that said ROR didn't......
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993
Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 02:38 PM
|
#45
|
Franchise Player
|
And thus ends the Kiprusoff era in Calgary....
I'm really looking forward to seeing Ramo in Flames' silks and how much more his skills have been refined. I wasn't impressed with him at all when he played in TB, but by all accounts he's been one of the top goalies wherever he's played. It would be pretty damn awesome if Ramo kept the last 10 years of solid Flames goaltending going. That makes 1 less hole to fill in the future.
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 02:41 PM
|
#46
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Browndog71
I am not 100% sure, but I think that Feaster mentioned at the Tuesday night season ticket holder session that the way MacDonald's contract was structured, he would not have to clear waivers to be sent down.
|
I think he said that the money they gave MacDonlad would not effect the cap space for the flames if he was sent down.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-05-2013, 02:46 PM
|
#47
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:  
|
**edit** Thinking back, he might have mentioned that it was how it would count (or not count) against the cap due to how it was structured.
I was partaking in the free beers, so forgive my confusion.
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 02:56 PM
|
#48
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: lower mainland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAN
I think differently. I think Ramo's contract will be one way. There's probably a clause in there that allows him to go back to the KHL if sent down. Guys like Ramo often protect themselves from the AHL.
|
You might be right, I could see that because of Ramo's bargaining position. I guess just ideally I'd hope Ramo is ok with making KHL type money on a 2-way in the AHL. Besides the money in his pocket he'd know they'd much prefer using him on the big club with that kind of contract. Who knows what everyone has been told behind closed doors but Flames management has been saying things are wide open for everyone to earn a spot in goal. If they add Ramo as a second guy on a one-way deal, that's not really leaving things all that wide open. They can always waive MacD, but I'd think they'd be really leery about doing it straight out of camp. Berra wouldn't be getting that much of a chance, or at the very least it would be easy for him to get the impression he wasn't. I suppose we'll probably see on July 5th.
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 02:57 PM
|
#49
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Nieuwendyk
I can't see them spending assets on a high profile goalie until they find out what they've got in Ramo/Berra
|
Might be too late by then. I might take a flyer on someone like Tim Thomas or Bryzgalov if he gets bought out.
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 02:59 PM
|
#50
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff
Might be too late by then. I might take a flyer on someone like Tim Thomas or Bryzgalov if he gets bought out.
|
Too late for what? To make the playoffs? I'd suggest it's too late for that already.
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 03:05 PM
|
#51
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Nieuwendyk
Too late for what? To make the playoffs? I'd suggest it's too late for that already. 
|
Too late to get a decent NHL goaltender.
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 03:09 PM
|
#52
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Browndog71
I am not 100% sure, but I think that Feaster mentioned at the Tuesday night season ticket holder session that the way MacDonald's contract was structured, he would not have to clear waivers to be sent down.
|
nm
Last edited by Robbob; 06-05-2013 at 03:12 PM.
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 03:10 PM
|
#53
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Everyone is talking Berra, ramo and Mac but I want to see them start everyone from scratch. Don't pencil anyone in and let's see what ortio and brossoit can do in camp too. Don't be afraid to play a kid if they show something special
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 03:49 PM
|
#54
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: lower mainland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cznTiburon
Everyone is talking Berra, ramo and Mac but I want to see them start everyone from scratch. Don't pencil anyone in and let's see what ortio and brossoit can do in camp too. Don't be afraid to play a kid if they show something special
|
I think at least some other posters are like me in not pencilling anyone in even if I'm just talking about those three guys for the job. I'd love for all of them to have an equal shot but may sometimes just talk about the most likely candidates in the course of discussion.
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 03:50 PM
|
#55
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff
Might be too late by then. I might take a flyer on someone like Tim Thomas or Bryzgalov if he gets bought out.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff
Too late to get a decent NHL goaltender.
|
I wouldn't worry about that. There are always more goaltenders in oddball situations that can come in and be a #1. If we miss the boat on Bernier, then we may find out that Fleury is on the market after his performance in this playoffs. And Luongo is always available to whoever will jump on that whale of a contract.
Lots of UFAs coming up this summer too. Backstrom, Thomas (if he decides to play again), Smith, Nabokov, Emery, etc.
If we want to change directions with our goalies, we can. I just don't see a point in worrying about it until after we see a season of Ramo / Berra.
MacDonald is a great backup and all that but I hope we trade him at the start of the season to a team that needs him (Canes?) and then platoon Ramo / Berra for the season to truly see what they both have going on at the NHL level.
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 03:55 PM
|
#56
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Broissoit I am not so sure he could make a solid push to be on the Flames opening roster. He is good but I feel he needs some ice time in the AHL or ECHL. Ortio has a chance to make a solid push, ultimately boild down to how Berra and Ramo pan out.
From what I have heard, Berra has a decent chance at being the starter. His size and agility could mask his rebound control issues. Ramo, I like him, he's seen the NHL and seasoned himself in the KHL. Camp is going to be very very interesting from a goaltending perspective.
In the end though I see Hartley throwing both Ramo and Berra right into the fire from opening day, having Joey Mac sitting back-up when things go awry. So a starting rotation of Ramo and Berra where on starts and one is in the press box with Macdonald sitting on the bench ready to take over.
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 03:57 PM
|
#57
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kehatch
From the sounds of it they already went after Bernier last season. Plus, Conroy said they are looking at their options in net.
Having to many good goalies is a good problem to have. Finding out that Berra/Ramo don't cut it on NA ice and being stuck with MacDonald as your starter would be pretty bad.
|
If the plan really is to make the playoffs, there's no way the Flames start the season with Ramo/Berra + MacDonald tandem in net. That would be the most unproven goaltending lineup in recent NHL history.
Personally, I'd be fine with throwing those guys in and setting ourselves up for another lottery pick. But I doubt management sees it that way. Expect the Flames to try to sign Smith or Emery.
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 05:25 PM
|
#58
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
|
The Flames most likely are going to the dance with the five netminders they have on hand now.
|
|
|
06-05-2013, 06:33 PM
|
#59
|
I believe in the Pony Power
|
Ramo is Plan A
Berra is Plan B
MacDonald is Plan C
I'm sure the organization is hoping Ramo/Berra is their new tandem. Mac is an insurance policy.
Gonna be an interesting year folks.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-05-2013, 06:53 PM
|
#60
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I actually like brossoit over Berra and ramo, hopefully there will be room for him to take the number one job in the next 5 years
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:59 PM.
|
|