06-03-2013, 03:06 PM
|
#4981
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by InCoGnEtO
Going back to the Draft Value chart:
Preds:
#4 = 783
#66 = 177
TOTAL: 960
Flames:
#6 = 702
#30 = 265
TOTAL: 967
That is as close to an even deal as you will find in the league. basically trade down a round+ to move up two spots to get Barkov.
I'm down.
|
Is that a trade they couldn't refuse though? I think they want scoring instead of shuffled draft picks and a later NHL ready player.
|
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 03:19 PM
|
#4982
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
|
Cammy and 30 for #4, I'd do it.
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 03:20 PM
|
#4983
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: lower mainland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by InCoGnEtO
Going back to the Draft Value chart:
Preds:
#4 = 783
#66 = 177
TOTAL: 960
Flames:
#6 = 702
#30 = 265
TOTAL: 967
That is as close to an even deal as you will find in the league. basically trade down a round+ to move up two spots to get Barkov.
I'm down.
|
Those charts are just a starting point and a other factors can heavily override them:
- valuation of individual prospects in the range of the pick (ie: big drop-off in talent vs no drop-off)
- organizational need for player type, position, and timing of contribution
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 03:28 PM
|
#4984
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bucksmasher
Is that a trade they couldn't refuse though? I think they want scoring instead of shuffled draft picks and a later NHL ready player.
|
Its a trade that is much more likely than trading our mediocre vets and a late 1st for their top 4 pick.
If they are trading a top 4 pick they are going to want quality back not a bunch of late picks and a 2nd line player over 30.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 03:34 PM
|
#4985
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
|
Probably already mentioned amongst these 200 pages but seems Dale Tallon open to trading #2:
Quote:
|
@dcmahiban: #FLAPanthers GM Dale Tallon willing to listen to offers for the No. 2 pick. Likes the team's depth coming through their system #NHLDraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 03:40 PM
|
#4986
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by indes
Cammy and 30 for #4, I'd do it.
|
Would have to throw in #22 as well.
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 03:43 PM
|
#4987
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon
Probably already mentioned amongst these 200 pages but seems Dale Tallon open to trading #2:
|
If that's the case, and given Feaster's comments... you better believe the Flames would be interested. Unlike other teams, they can give a great draft pick back in return (the #6), and whatever else you'd have to negotiate in there.
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 03:45 PM
|
#4988
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by indes
Cammy and 30 for #4, I'd do it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by goflamesgo18
Would have to throw in #22 as well.
|
How about :
Cammy and #30 for #14 (Columbus)
#14 and #22 for #4 (Nashville)
#4 and #6 for #2 and #31 (Florida)
...providing the Avs do indeed take Jones, because if they took MacKinnon I'd rather just keep #4 and #6 and take Barkov and Lindholm/Monahan.
haha
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 03:46 PM
|
#4989
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Supposedly the Sabres are being aggressive in trying to move up as well. We aren't the only team able/willing to potentially move up.
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 03:54 PM
|
#4990
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
How about:
Cammy and #30 for #14 (Columbus)
#14 and #22 for #4 (Nashville)
#4 and #6 for #2 and #31 (Florida)
...providing the Avs do indeed take Jones, because if they took MacKinnon I'd rather just keep #4 and #6 and take Barkov and Lindholm/Monahan.
haha
|
Even with MacKinnon on the table it would be wise to hold on to 4 and 6 if we could somehow come away with both picks. Barkov and Monahan would be sick moving forward. Who knows maybe we could even get Drouin if Tampa goes Russian
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 03:59 PM
|
#4991
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: On my metal monster.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
How about:
Cammy and #30 for #14 (Columbus)
#14 and #22 for #4 (Nashville)
#4 and #6 for #2 and #31 (Florida)
...providing the Avs do indeed take Jones, because if they took MacKinnon I'd rather just keep #4 and #6 and take Barkov and Lindholm/Monahan.
haha
|
If rather take #4 and #6 than #2 and #31.
Barkov + Monahan/Lindholm >>>>>>>>>> MacKinnon + whoever (still a decent prospect).
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 3 Justin 3 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 04:05 PM
|
#4992
|
|
Franchise Player
|
definitely. if we can make the moves to get two top 5 picks, keep them and grab barkov + lindolm/monahan.
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 04:06 PM
|
#4993
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
Even with MacKinnon on the table it would be wise to hold on to 4 and 6 if we could somehow come away with both picks. Barkov and Monahan would be sick moving forward. Who knows maybe we could even get Drouin if Tampa goes Russian
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3 Justin 3
If rather take #4 and #6 than #2 and #31.
Barkov + Monahan/Lindholm >>>>>>>>>> MacKinnon + whoever (still a decent prospect).
|
I agree, but I had to keep going.
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 04:31 PM
|
#4994
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
How about:
Cammy and #30 for #14 (Columbus)
#14 and #22 for #4 (Nashville)
#4 and #6 for #2 and #31 (Florida)
...providing the Avs do indeed take Jones, because if they took MacKinnon I'd rather just keep #4 and #6 and take Barkov and Lindholm/Monahan.
haha
|
If Feaster was able to somehow convert Cammellari, the #6 and #22 picks to the #2 and #4 picks (the 30th and 31st pick are basically a wash), I have no problems in saying I'll develop a serious man crush on his GM'ing skills, and forgive him for all the blunders he's made so far.
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 05:14 PM
|
#4995
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man
If Feaster was able to somehow convert Cammellari, the #6 and #22 picks to the #2 and #4 picks (the 30th and 31st pick are basically a wash), I have no problems in saying I'll develop a serious man crush on his GM'ing skills, and forgive him for all the blunders he's made so far.
|
In this scenario he only has the #2 pick. Not #4
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to albertGQ For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 05:17 PM
|
#4996
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Yah, if you consider the Pitts 1st and FLA 2nd a wash, then it would be...
Cammy, #22, #6 for #2
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 05:30 PM
|
#4997
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
How about:
Cammy and #30 for #14 (Columbus)
#14 and #22 for #4 (Nashville)
#4 and #6 for #2 and #31 (Florida)
...providing the Avs do indeed take Jones, because if they took MacKinnon I'd rather just keep #4 and #6 and take Barkov and Lindholm/Monahan.
haha
|
Columbus might do it
Nashville passes in a big way. (adding Backlund might get them thinking)
Florida probably does it.
One things for sure, if Colorado picks Jones Feaster will be busy working the phones.
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 05:43 PM
|
#4998
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ
In this scenario he only has the #2 pick. Not #4
|
Whoops, misread that. I guess it's Cammy, the 22nd, and 30th for the 4th. That's still a steal of a deal, and if Feaster can pull that off, he'd be a God in my eyes. Can you imagine Barkov/Drouin AND Lindholm/Monahan?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Yen Man For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 05:47 PM
|
#4999
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man
Whoops, misread that. I guess it's Cammy, the 22nd, and 30th for the 4th. That's still a steal of a deal, and if Feaster can pull that off, he'd be a God in my eyes. Can you imagine Barkov/Drouin AND Lindholm/Monahan?
|
Misread it again Yen Man...
Cammy + 22nd + 6th <-FOR-> 2nd
|
|
|
|
|
06-03-2013, 06:04 PM
|
#5000
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
Misread it again Yen Man...
Cammy + 22nd + 6th <-FOR-> 2nd
|
Yikes, can you tell it's nearing the end of the workday for me?
Hmm, so third's a charm, lets hope I got this right.
If he keeps the 4th and the 6th, then it's Cammy + 22nd + 30th for the 4th? I'd still do it.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 AM.
|
|
