Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum > Food and Entertainment
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-21-2013, 12:44 AM   #181
Yeah_Baby
Franchise Player
 
Yeah_Baby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KTrain View Post
I saw it as well and it is easily the best Star Trek movie.

You're right, it was essentially a remake the best Star Trek movie.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Thats why Flames fans make ideal Star Trek fans. We've really been taught to embrace the self-loathing and extreme criticism.
Check out The Pod-Wraiths: A Star Trek Deep Space Nine Podcast
Yeah_Baby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 08:59 AM   #182
Yeah_Baby
Franchise Player
 
Yeah_Baby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
Exp:
Default

JJTrek just doesn't have any emotional depth to it
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke View Post
Thats why Flames fans make ideal Star Trek fans. We've really been taught to embrace the self-loathing and extreme criticism.
Check out The Pod-Wraiths: A Star Trek Deep Space Nine Podcast
Yeah_Baby is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Yeah_Baby For This Useful Post:
Old 05-21-2013, 09:08 AM   #183
St. Pats
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

This one just wasn't as good as the first reboot. I found the story to be underdeveloped. It was just too matter of fact. There was plently of good action but no change of pace to make it seem more dramatic. The interaction between the characters was not as good. Bones in particular seemed left out. Sort of all sacrificed to jam in more action scenes is how it seemed to me.

I found it just hmmm or meh.
St. Pats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 09:46 AM   #184
KTrain
ALL ABOARD!
 
KTrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeah_Baby View Post
You're right, it was essentially a remake the best Star Trek movie.
No, this was better than Wrath of Khan.

But then again, I've always enjoyed Undiscovered Country more than Wrath. Khan has always looked ridiculous to me. But that's a product of the 60s and 80s costumes/hair.

Last edited by KTrain; 05-21-2013 at 09:55 AM. Reason: Wraith for Wrath
KTrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 09:51 AM   #185
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KTrain View Post
No, this was better than Wraith of Khan.

But then again, I've always enjoyed Undiscovered Country more than Wraith. Khan has always looked ridiculous to me. But that's a product of the 60s and 80s costumes/hair.
I would take Wrath of Khan over the current version easily. It was also the rare movie where the protagonist and Antagonist never meet face to face.

If you can get by the 80's uber mullets the acting in the original WOK was just far better. Montabalm was the perfect Captain Ahab chasing his white whale. Shatner for the most part put away a lot of his cheese tendencies for this movie. Kirstie Alley was excellent in her role and it showed as she was replaced in the next movie by a not near as good Robin Curtis.

You really gained some sympathy for Khan as a former strong leader who lead his people to hell for the simplest of reasons, which was revenge.

To me there was just a feeling of powerful emotion in the ST2 movie that I didn't feel in the new one.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 05-21-2013, 10:12 AM   #186
KTrain
ALL ABOARD!
 
KTrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed Wrath. There were a lot of great, emotional moments. I think a lot of the Khan hate in the new movie is because the actor/character is loved so much from the show and the movie. But Wrath had just as many plot holes as Into Darkness. There was also a lot of overacting from Montabalm and Shatner.

As a Star Trek fan I know Khan is suposed to be the pinnacle of the films but it's 5th for me.

1. Into Darkness
2. First Contact
3. Undiscovered Country
4. Star Trek (2009)
5. Wrath of Khan
KTrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 01:44 PM   #187
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I thought I was alone in liking the Undiscovered Country!
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
Old 05-21-2013, 01:58 PM   #188
jammies
Basement Chicken Choker
 
jammies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In a land without pants, or war, or want. But mostly we care about the pants.
Exp:
Default

They must have had warp One Billion to get from the Klingon neutral zone to just beside the Moon in about 2 minutes of real-time.
__________________
Better educated sadness than oblivious joy.
jammies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 02:03 PM   #189
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Undiscovered Country was one of my favorites as well.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 02:40 PM   #190
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Warp Drive:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warp_drive

Exact velocities were only given in the Voyager episode "The 37's" where Tom Paris describes Voyager's velocity at warp factor 9.9 (under the new warp table formula) as being about 4 billion miles per second, which would be about 21,500 times the speed of light (although Voyager cannot maintain this velocity for very long). Voyager was about 70,000 light-years away from home. Simple calculation reveals that it would take "just" about 3.3 years to travel such distance.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 02:46 PM   #191
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Undiscovered Coutry was a great movie, and continued the curse of the odd numbered movies. Christopher Plumber was an amazing Klingon, they finally adressed the inevitable end or retirement of the original enterprise crew as well. The movie chugged a lot during the prison scene.

In terms of what liked and didn't like

Star Trek TMP - A movie that was incredibly smart, but incredibly dull. The plot line was very good with man having to deal with his actions in the Universe, we'd see that again later on. The pacing was very slow with a lot of really long shots out the view screen. The interaction between the crew wasn't really there, especially between Bones and Spoke. Persia Khombata (sp?) was gorgeous but couldn't act. There wasn't enough actual action. Exposed us to the new Klingons. I loved the end line when Sulu asks for a course and Kirk waves his hand and says "Out there, that away, and then sinks back into his chair"

Star Trek 2 TWOK - probably the best villain in a returning Khan hell bent for vengeance over the loss of his wife. Khan and Shatner really chewed up the scenery. We also saw the return of the informality between crew members which made the original show great. The death scene for Spock was a shocker and kirk desperately trying to touch his friend through the glass was awesomely well done. Khan line" He tasks me. He tasks me and I shall have him! I'll chase him 'round the moons of Nibia and 'round the Antares Maelstrom and 'round Perdition's flames before I give him up!"

Star Trek 3 The search for Spock.- Wasn't a great movie by any stretch. Christopher Lloyd and Dan from Night Court chewed up the scenery as Klingons. The moment when Kirk's son is killed and Kirk falls back muttering "You killed my son", it set the stage for Star Trek 6. It was like a finale when the Enterprise blew up and spiraled into Flame with Kirk watching from the surface.

Star Trek 4 - The Voyage home - Very strong movie that focused on the crew, and had some great humor in it. The whole fish out of water scenario played out incredibly well, and all of the cast members shared screen time. Checkov was the unintentional star (Can you tell me where they keep the nuclear wessels". A bit of a repeat of the first movie with the probe returning and creating a consequence for man's previous history.

Star Trek 5 - The final frontier. A terrible movie where the main characters basically gave up their dignity for humor. Spock gets brain washed, McCoy murders his father, Uhura does the fan dance 20 years too late. Scotty bangs his head on a bulk head knocking himself out. The villian was incredibly weak, and somehow they made a Klingon boring. The premise was terrible and Kirk was overly heroic. The only good scene was really the end camping scene. But it had one great line "Excuse me, what does God need with a starship?"

Star Trek 6 - The undiscovered country - Great movie and even numbered. The cast has been allowed to grey out and they are looking forward to retirement after one last mission. Kirk shows his hatred of the Klingons. Spock uses the Vulcan proverb "Only Nixon could go to China" The guest actors were exceptional, from Plumber to Warner to Kim Catrell. The mind rape scene by Spock was out of character. Plumber gleefully yelling Shakespear while blasting the enterprise. Sulu finally gets his own ship. "Cry Havoc and let loose the dogs of way"

Star Trek TNG Generations - Not a great movie with what I would consider to be a bad plotline. The only thing that made it watchable was Malcolm McDowell who is a great villian in everything that he does and called Luke Skywalker an a$$hole in Wing Commander. They destroyed the Enterprise in the same way that Hulk Hogan destroyed Barry Horrowitz.

Star Trek First Contact - Decent movie that went a long way in wrecking the Borg as a scary entity by getting rid of the hive mind and introducing a queen. This was the start of the focus on Picard and Data as most of the other characters had little to do. Patrick Stewart was ok but I just couldn't equate him to Ahab like the movie tried to force us too. Making Cochrane incredibly flawed went against Canon though.

Star Trek Insurrection - Terrible movie with humor around Riker's beard and Worf's zit. The truly cringeworthy Data/Picard sing along, terrible villians an incredibly annoying sub villian. Riker flying and fighting the enterprise with a flight controller joy stick. This movie was worse then the Star Wars Christmas special and there was nothing good about it except

Star Trek -Nemesis - This movie should have been burned instead of released, Insurrection was bad, this was worse. Tom Hardy was valient with a bad character (Can I touch your hair,and then rape Troi) Data does the ultimate sacrifice which saddens fans who actually cared about Fat Data at that point, but then gets slapped in the face later when he's resurrected in B4 (Really?). And whoever designs star ships in the future. Why do Transporters always go first, the Ventral shields are thinner then a latex condom, and its a bad idea to put an open Thaloron or whatever radiation generator on the bridge. Terrible brutal movie.

Star Trek reboot - Remarkable for the performances, though the villain and his motivations weren't all that great, they were trying to out Khan Khan. Still wan't a huge fan of Beverly Hills 9021-Kirk. The stranding of Kirk on an ice planet with no weapon was incredibly stupid writing when you have a brig with force fields and all that crap. It was good to see Nimoy playing older spock though.

My order of favorites

Star Trek 2
Star Trek4
Star Trek 6
Into Darkness
First Contact
Star Trek Abrams
Star Trek 3
Star Trek tmp
Star Trek Generations
The 70's cartoon
Klingon Academy video game
Galaxy quest
Star Fleet Academy video game
half a dozenfan based movies
Star Trek the porn parady
Star Trek 5
Insurrection
Nemisis
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
Old 05-21-2013, 03:15 PM   #192
WhiteTiger
Franchise Player
 
WhiteTiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

I watched the movie this afternoon. Not too bad, as far as action flicks go. I guess I'd have gotten more out of it if I'd seen Wrath of Khan.
WhiteTiger is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 03:19 PM   #193
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Meh.

Less lens flares this time, that was nice.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 03:25 PM   #194
Teh_Bandwagoner
First Line Centre
 
Teh_Bandwagoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The wagon's name is "Gaudreau"
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teh_Bandwagoner View Post
Thoroughly entertaining movie from start to end. I am a bit confused about something though now that I've had to think about it. I think I've pieced most of it together except for one thing. I realize there is a spoiler tag on the op title now,11 but I'll cover this in case:

Spoiler!
Is anyone able to explain this to me? Still scratching my head over this a little bit.
__________________
Teh_Bandwagoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 03:35 PM   #195
Kjesse
Retired
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teh_Bandwagoner View Post
Is anyone able to explain this to me? Still scratching my head over this a little bit.
Marcus found/de-iced Khan specifically to enlist him to help build the Vengeance. Marcus believes war with the Klingons is inevitable. He needed Khan to build the ship/militarize starfleet. Then Marcus discarded him and covered the tracks of what he had done. What exactly Marcus promised, I'm not sure, but likely the return of his crew.

In revenge, Khan blew up the starfleet archives, where the alteration of the databanks happened.

Something like that.

Last edited by Kjesse; 05-21-2013 at 03:39 PM.
Kjesse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 04:13 PM   #196
Teh_Bandwagoner
First Line Centre
 
Teh_Bandwagoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The wagon's name is "Gaudreau"
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delgar View Post
Marcus found/de-iced Khan specifically to enlist him to help build the Vengeance. Marcus believes war with the Klingons is inevitable. He needed Khan to build the ship/militarize starfleet. Then Marcus discarded him and covered the tracks of what he had done. What exactly Marcus promised, I'm not sure, but likely the return of his crew.

In revenge, Khan blew up the starfleet archives, where the alteration of the databanks happened.

Something like that.
And that's where I get muddled up. How do you "discard" Khan? Did Marcus just drive into the woods, open the door and say "You're free, boy!" and Khan pranced away happily?

Or maybe that really is the explanation. Marcus tried to dump Khan, but then Khan broke free to regroup and attack the facility again? I suppose I could accept that explanation.
__________________
Teh_Bandwagoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 04:33 PM   #197
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delgar View Post
Marcus found/de-iced Khan specifically to enlist him to help build the Vengeance. Marcus believes war with the Klingons is inevitable. He needed Khan to build the ship/militarize starfleet. Then Marcus discarded him and covered the tracks of what he had done. What exactly Marcus promised, I'm not sure, but likely the return of his crew.

In revenge, Khan blew up the starfleet archives, where the alteration of the databanks happened.

Something like that.
Which is funny, because in Space Seed Khan didn't know anything about Star Ship technology or weapons or tactics, he was a global leader not an engineer.

Even in wrath of Khan he didn't understand star ship operations.

The time line shift wouldn't have changed it.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2013, 07:28 PM   #198
KTrain
ALL ABOARD!
 
KTrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Meh.
KTrain is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to KTrain For This Useful Post:
Old 05-21-2013, 07:49 PM   #199
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teh_Bandwagoner View Post
Is anyone able to explain this to me? Still scratching my head over this a little bit.
Khan himself explained it pretty well...

Marcus found the Botany Bay and woke up Khan only. He coerced him into helping design/build the Vengeance and it's weapons by withholding his crew from them and threatening to kill them. Khan eventually attempted to smuggle them out in those special photon torpedoes, but he was discovered and was forced to flee. Assuming that Marcus had murdered his crew, he began his vengeance on Starfleet, which is where the movie begins.
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OutOfTheCube For This Useful Post:
Old 05-21-2013, 07:52 PM   #200
FlameOn
Franchise Player
 
FlameOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch View Post
Which is funny, because in Space Seed Khan didn't know anything about Star Ship technology or weapons or tactics, he was a global leader not an engineer.

Even in wrath of Khan he didn't understand star ship operations.

The time line shift wouldn't have changed it.
Is it possible it's another one of Khan's family, an engineer perhaps? They never explicitly said Khan's first name in Into the Darkness (well old Spock did, but he wasn't really involved) There's the age difference too when you think about it.
FlameOn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:57 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy