Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which C to choose?
Lindholm 327 48.30%
Monahan 319 47.12%
Someone Else (Other C, Not a C, Etc) 31 4.58%
Voters: 677. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-30-2013, 10:17 AM   #221
Tinordi
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Exp:
Default

Who was the last high end Swedish prospect to bust or not achieve expectations?
Tinordi is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 10:18 AM   #222
edslunch
Franchise Player
 
edslunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beatle17 View Post
I was just checking out the young prospects and noticed that Jankowski is only 2 weeks older than Monahan and 2.5 months older than Lindholm. So either one could be good and they would be coming into their own at the same time as Jankowski. Seems that guys with later birthdays stand out in their draft years (Seth Jones is a late 94 also).

Just found this interesting, not trying to compare anyones ability.
In hindsight I don't like the Jankowski pick from the perspective that he's a year or more behind either of these guys. If the Flames had gone with a safer pick they would have a still very good player who might be ready to play in the next year or so. I'm hopeful for Jankowski I'm just not sure he's what the flames needed timing wise
edslunch is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 10:19 AM   #223
Dime_On_Flames
Scoring Winger
 
Dime_On_Flames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Frozen North
Exp:
Default

Wow 12 pages later and still no poll? It's harder to get a poll on here then getting a credit card!
__________________
IN TRELIVING WE TRUST
Dime_On_Flames is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dime_On_Flames For This Useful Post:
Old 04-30-2013, 10:19 AM   #224
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
Who was the last high end Swedish prospect to bust or not achieve expectations?
I'd say Larsson and Hedman are failing to meet expectations, but they are defencemen.

Swedish forwards seem to be pretty safe.
Ashasx is online now  
Old 04-30-2013, 10:20 AM   #225
Muffins
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Muffins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Neither here nor there
Exp:
Default

In a perfect world, Nashville takes Nichushkin and Carolina Takes Nurse/Ristolainen.

Then we don't even have to worry about this decision as Barkov falls into our lap.

Dare to dream!
__________________
"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity" -Abraham Lincoln
Muffins is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Muffins For This Useful Post:
Old 04-30-2013, 10:22 AM   #226
Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Moscow
Exp:
Default

It is virtually certain that there will be two (and only two) of Nichuskin, Lindholm, and Monahan available when the Flames draft. The discussion should really be how we rank those three prospects (rather than a choice between just Lindholm and Monahan), no?

Personally, I really, really hope that Lindholm is still available at 6.
__________________
"Life of Russian hockey veterans is very hard," said Soviet hockey star Sergei Makarov. "Most of them don't have enough to eat these days. These old players are Russian legends."
Makarov is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 10:27 AM   #227
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

So in the prospect review last night just like other reviews etc, when Shinkaruk came up, there was a lot of emphasis on how elite his offensive skills were, and just how dangerous of a player he is projected to be. NOT to imply that he is who the Flames should consider, but I'd just like to know what is separating him from Lindholm/Monahan? As there wasn't nearly as much emphasis on goal scoring ability/offense in talk around L/M as there was with him (I know Lindholm is considered more of a playmaker). Are L/M just more well rounded, as well as the size factor? Hockey sense/IQ? It just sounds like they're overselling him a bit at 9/10 compared to even some higher ranked players. (Maybe cause they think Edm will pick him up..)

He's kind of being made out to sound like the "Iginla" of the draft, in terms of a pure goal scorer. And it keeps catching my attention, which is why I'm curious to know what places our potential 2 center picks ahead of him.
djsFlames is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 10:29 AM   #228
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
So in the prospect review last night just like other reviews etc, when Shinkaruk came up, there was a lot of emphasis on how elite his offensive skills were, and just how dangerous of a player he is projected to be. NOT to imply that he is who the Flames should consider, but I'd just like to know what is separating him from Lindholm/Monahan? As there wasn't nearly as much emphasis on goal scoring ability/offense in talk around L/M as there was with him (I know Lindholm is considered more of a playmaker). Are L/M just more well rounded, as well as the size factor? Hockey sense/IQ? It just sounds like they're overselling him a bit at 9/10 compared to even some higher ranked players. (Maybe cause they think Edm will pick him up..)

He's kind of being made out to sound like the "Iginla" of the draft, in terms of a pure goal scorer. And it keeps catching my attention, which is why I'm curious to know what places our potential 2 center picks ahead of him.
Shinkaruk is awful defensively, he's a left winger, and he's shorter than 5'11".
Ashasx is online now  
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 04-30-2013, 10:30 AM   #229
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dime_On_Flames View Post
Wow 12 pages later and still no poll? It's harder to get a poll on here then getting a credit card!
I think a poll will cause some added polarization on draft day to be honest. There's some pretty decent discussion here.

I, however, have already decided to burn this place to the ground if we don't draft Lindholm. So stock up on plastic sheeting and duct tape everyone.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 10:31 AM   #230
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puds View Post
Any reason Monahan wasn't on the U18 team?
He was too old. Late 94 birth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trailer Fire View Post
I know a bit about both Lindholm and Monahan, anyone care to sell me on either pick? Not what they could be, but what they are. What they bring to the table right now, as opposed to projecting to be "X" player with "X" ceiling.
Seems for many here it comes down to Lindholm being European so big offensive upside but small and Monahan is Canadian so a plug but big with leadership.

Honestly to me they look very similar both seem to have the size to be a number 1 center, both have the offensive skills to put up points like a number 1 center and both seem to have top level to elite hockey sense. I would be happy with either so tough to sell one over the other, in my view.
moon is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
Old 04-30-2013, 10:32 AM   #231
The Yen Man
Franchise Player
 
The Yen Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I would love it if the Flames were able to pick up Shinkaruk with the Blues pick, but that probably has even less of a chance of happening than Calgary somehow getting Barkov at 6.
The Yen Man is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 10:32 AM   #232
Icon
Franchise Player
 
Icon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Slightly prefer Monahan.

That said, if we grabbed Lindholm instead I'd be completely fine with that too.


I still think this is a moot point as we'll be trading with Tampa or Florida and getting MacKinnon, Drouin or Barkov instead.
Icon is online now  
Old 04-30-2013, 10:33 AM   #233
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Poll is up!
Ashasx is online now  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 04-30-2013, 10:33 AM   #234
drPepper1
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
Who was the last high end Swedish prospect to bust or not achieve expectations?
Robert Nilsson - 15th
Patrik Berglund - 25th
Macrus Johansson - 24th
Mikael Backlund - 24th
Anton Lander - 40th

These are some first round second tier Swedish centres drafted within last 4-5 seasons. Only bust is Nilsson. High end centres from Sweden are usually as advertised.
drPepper1 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to drPepper1 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-30-2013, 10:34 AM   #235
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
Seems for many here it comes down to Lindholm being European so big offensive upside but small and Monahan is Canadian so a plug but big with leadership.

Honestly to me they look very similar both seem to have the size to be a number 1 center, both have the offensive skills to put up points like a number 1 center and both seem to have top level to elite hockey sense. I would be happy with either so tough to sell one over the other, in my view.
Agree, too much generalizing due to nationality.

Both are similar players, and I think both will be good players in the NHL. If we could somehow get both players I would be ecstatic.
SuperMatt18 is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 10:34 AM   #236
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi View Post
Who was the last high end Swedish prospect to bust or not achieve expectations?
Depends what you mean by high end. There have been a lot of 1st round picks that have busted but lately there have been so few top 10 picks especially forwards from Sweden that you are right it looks like the few have turned out, although too early to say on Zibindejad (sp?).

MPS is probably the closest to a high end bust but he was 10th so not sure he qualifies for what you are talking about.
moon is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 10:34 AM   #237
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Gotta go with Monahan for sure. He puts the puck in the net, great vision and passing and just does everything out there in all 3 zones. Good size, faceoff stud, top end hockey IQ, and future captain material. Not that Lindholm isn't able to 2 way play and be physical, but I think Monahan will be a more complete player and I'm ok sacrificing a bit of extra offensive touch for that.
topfiverecords is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 10:35 AM   #238
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drPepper1 View Post
Robert Nilsson - 15th
Patrik Berglund - 25th
Macrus Johansson - 24th
Mikael Backlund - 24th
Anton Lander - 40th

These are some first round second tier Swedish centres drafted within last 4-5 seasons. Only bust is Nilsson. High end centres from Sweden are usually as advertised.
If including those guys then Anton Gufstafsson- 21st was a bust in 2008.
moon is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to moon For This Useful Post:
Old 04-30-2013, 10:41 AM   #239
automaton 3
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1stLand View Post
as long as he doesnt have a history of concussions, pick Lindholm

No more Rico Fatas or Danie Tzachuks please
Fata was a flat out lousy pick at 6th overall.

Tkachuk was actually a decent pick at the time IMO. He looked poised to make the jump to full-time NHL'er, but was derailed by concussion issues.
automaton 3 is offline  
Old 04-30-2013, 10:44 AM   #240
Clever_Iggy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
Exp:
Default

I don't know enough to differentiate the two. I picked Monahan, but so long as the Flames pick a center with the #6 or move up to take a center, I'll be happy.
Clever_Iggy is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:08 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy