04-29-2013, 12:44 PM
|
#3181
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
He is making fun of some of the posts made a few pages back.
|
Oh haha, that makes sense. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 12:56 PM
|
#3182
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
The best part of today is that we will finally know where we are drafting. The last couple months i have found myself cheering against the flames to get as high of a draft pick as possible. Tonight i will no longer have to think about possibilities (Except trades).............finally some closure.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to loob job For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 12:58 PM
|
#3183
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Fool
I'm no expert but for some reason Monahan reminds me of Chuck Kobasew. Plus I have a strong hunch that Lindholm will turn out to be a defenseman and Sweden produces great prospects in that position.
|
Looking forward to someone making this comparison if we end up picking him.
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:31 PM
|
#3184
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
|
What do you guys think the Flames should do if they DO win the lottery tonight?
1. Take Seth Jones
2. Take Nathan MacKinnon
3. Try to trade with Florida or Colorado for #2 or #3 to take MacKinnon
4. Other
I think they should take Seth Jones
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:32 PM
|
#3185
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bourque's Twin
What do you guys think the Flames should do if they DO win the lottery tonight?
1. Take Seth Jones
2. Take Nathan MacKinnon
3. Try to trade with Florida or Colorado for #2 or #3 to take MacKinnon
4. Other
I think they should take Seth Jones
|
Milk COL or FLA for all they're worth and take MacKinnon and run far far away.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:33 PM
|
#3186
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Milk COL or FLA for all they're worth and take MacKinnon and run far far away.
|
As soon as I made my last post I wanted to change it to this.
I agree with you.
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:34 PM
|
#3187
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
Mactavish announces his intention to trade down:
Dan Tencer @dantencer 27s MacTavish on trading 7/8 overall: "We'd be very receptive to moving back and picking up another pick." |
Perfect, let some other team get Nurse.
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:37 PM
|
#3188
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho
Perfect, let some other team get Nurse.
|
I'm not worried about the Oilers taking Nurse, we've seen what a low priority Edmonton puts on medical staff.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
|
3thirty,
Ashasx,
Clever_Iggy,
Enoch Root,
getbak,
Goodlad,
GreenHardHat,
nik-,
Phanuthier,
slybomb,
Smilt,
Table 5,
You Need a Thneed
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:38 PM
|
#3189
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bourque's Twin
As soon as I made my last post I wanted to change it to this.
I agree with you.
|
Yep, because if the Flames wanted to trade up you know thats what would happen to us as well.
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:40 PM
|
#3190
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Hypothetical scenario time:
1. Flames stay at #6
2. Oilers call and offer #7 for Pittsburgh and St. Louis picks
MacKinnon, Jones, Drouin, Barkov and Nurse are the five guys off the board
Q#1 - Do you accept Edmonton offer?
Q#2 - If yes, who do you pick with #6 & #7?
Monohan, Lindholm?
Lindholm, Nichushkin?
Monohan, Nichushkin?
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:41 PM
|
#3191
|
|
Not Jim Playfair
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
Hypothetical scenario time:
1. Flames stay at #6
2. Oilers call and offer #7 for Pittsburgh and St. Louis picks
MacKinnon, Jones, Drouin, Barkov and Nurse are the five guys off the board
Q#1 - Do you accept Edmonton offer?
Q#2 - If yes, who do you pick with #6 & #7?
Monohan, Lindholm?
Lindholm, Nichushkin?
Monohan, Nichushkin?
|
Yes. Accept.
__________________
CORNELL
National Champions: 1967, 1970
CALGARY
Stanley Cup Champions: 1989
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:41 PM
|
#3192
|
|
Franchise Player
|
If we win the lottery, I say we just keep it and make our pick. We need Mackinnen. Panthers want him too so if we trade with the Avs, we'd have to "settle" for Drouin or Barkov
Mackinnen > Drouin/Barkov + #32 pick
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:43 PM
|
#3193
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
Hypothetical scenario time:
1. Flames stay at #6
2. Oilers call and offer #7 for Pittsburgh and St. Louis picks
MacKinnon, Jones, Drouin, Barkov and Nurse are the five guys off the board
Q#1 - Do you accept Edmonton offer?
Q#2 - If yes, who do you pick with #6 & #7?
Monohan, Lindholm?
Lindholm, Nichushkin?
Monohan, Nichushkin?
|
Tempted by Nichushkin at this spot in the hypothetical. If reports are true sounds like the kid wants to play in North America, and wasn't happy with how he was "sold".
Take Monahan as your big, strong, Canadian center. Then to me it is a toss up between one of the two Europeans.
Last edited by SuperMatt18; 04-29-2013 at 01:48 PM.
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:43 PM
|
#3194
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgARI
Yes. Accept.
|
I think most (if not all) Flames fans would accept.
Who do you pick with the back to back picks?
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:43 PM
|
#3195
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
Hypothetical scenario time:
1. Flames stay at #6
2. Oilers call and offer #7 for Pittsburgh and St. Louis picks
MacKinnon, Jones, Drouin, Barkov and Nurse are the five guys off the board
Q#1 - Do you accept Edmonton offer?
Q#2 - If yes, who do you pick with #6 & #7?
Monohan, Lindholm?
Lindholm, Nichushkin?
Monohan, Nichushkin?
|
Yes. Absolutely (I'd even add a sweetener). Then pick Monohan and Lindholm.
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:44 PM
|
#3196
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
Hypothetical scenario time:
1. Flames stay at #6
2. Oilers call and offer #7 for Pittsburgh and St. Louis picks
MacKinnon, Jones, Drouin, Barkov and Nurse are the five guys off the board
Q#1 - Do you accept Edmonton offer?
Q#2 - If yes, who do you pick with #6 & #7?
Monohan, Lindholm?
Lindholm, Nichushkin?
Monohan, Nichushkin?
|
Take it and Mactavish gets fired before the draft.
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:44 PM
|
#3197
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
Tempted by Nichushkin at this spot in the hypothetical. If reports are true sounds like the kid wants to play in North America, and wasn't happy with how he was "sold".
|
That's kind of what I'm leaning towards with the hypothetical, as in do you take a gamble on Nichushkin in a spot like that?
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:46 PM
|
#3198
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: City by the Bay
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
I'm not worried about the Oilers taking Nurse, we've seen what a low priority Edmonton puts on medical staff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:51 PM
|
#3199
|
|
Ass Handler
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Okotoks, AB
|
I would absolutely offer Mactavish the St Louis and Pittsburgh picks for their 1st rounder. That's a no-brainer. You then take the 6th pick and flip it, along with a current roster player named Cammalleri/Glencross/Tanguay to whomever is drafting second.
Make it happen, Feaster.
|
|
|
|
|
04-29-2013, 01:58 PM
|
#3200
|
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
Feaster said size and Center position are a must. Looks like Monahan will be dawning the flaming C next season.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25 PM.
|
|
