Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2013, 06:23 PM   #1
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default Donations to Alberta Tories linked to election promises

Quote:
A representative of a coalition of construction companies and anti-union contractors lobbied Premier Alison Redford by linking large political donations to Redford and to the provincial Conservative party with political promises to revise Alberta’s labour code, according to documents obtained through Freedom of Information.

“In my opinion, they are essentially saying, ‘Our donations are given in return for government action on specific issues,’” said Duff Conacher, founder of Democracy Watch, an Ottawa-based watchdog group.

“They are saying their donations are connected to those actions, and dependent on those actions,” said Conacher, who is also an adjunct law professor at the University of Toronto. “And that, I think, in my opinion, crosses the line in the Criminal Code bribery provisions.”
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgar...-promises.html

Always nice. What is this, the US?
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 06:28 PM   #2
Major Major
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Nenshi for Premier
Major Major is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Major Major For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2013, 06:35 PM   #3
Jacks
Franchise Player
 
Jacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

That doesn't matter, the real question is what would the Wildrose have done?
Jacks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 06:37 PM   #4
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

I don't find this that bad because

- The donations were made legally
- Redford Campaigned on revising the labour code during the leadership race and election campaign.

It is a slippery slope you walk down with campaign donations which is why the limit should be greatly reduced. As long as Redford and the PC's legislate based on issues they campaign on it is not so bad.

As for the outrage over the donators wanting to control policy I think is kind of ridiculous. Everyone who donates wants to control policy. That is the point of making a political donation. Even on the individual level if you donate to a political party it is because you want to influence the election result more than your vote can. YOu think that your money can help the party you want in win.

The main focus of all of these issues should be campaign financing reform.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 06:57 PM   #5
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

This is what politics is. Always has been and always will be.

The Americans never had a monopoly on this behaviour.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 06:57 PM   #6
Free Ben Hur!
Scoring Winger
 
Free Ben Hur!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Judea
Exp:
Default

Hard to believe its PCL, Flint and Ledcor that are involved ....
Free Ben Hur! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 07:12 PM   #7
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

This happens everywhere that there is democracy. It sounds like this is within the rules.

Wenzel et al didn't stay within the rules.


Keeping unions out of the construction industry here is also a really really good idea.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
Old 04-25-2013, 07:47 PM   #8
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Flint made an $850 donation, hardly anything.
burn_this_city is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 07:47 PM   #9
Senator Clay Davis
Franchise Player
 
Senator Clay Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland State House, Annapolis
Exp:
Default

If Nenshi runs he'll win. He'll carry Calgary and Edmonton and that will be that. Much, much better option than any of the current 4 available.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
Senator Clay Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2013, 07:52 PM   #10
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis View Post
If Nenshi runs he'll win. He'll carry Calgary and Edmonton and that will be that. Much, much better option than any of the current 4 available.
Interestingly, I think you could say the same of Mandel. I dunno if either of them would want to operate within the confines of the PCs/WRP though.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 03:27 AM   #11
longsuffering
First Line Centre
 
longsuffering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
I find this just as distasteful as the situation in Calgary.

There can not be a 'quid pro quo' on donations.
longsuffering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 09:34 AM   #12
Kavvy
Self Imposed Exile
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
Interestingly, I think you could say the same of Mandel. I dunno if either of them would want to operate within the confines of the PCs/WRP though.
I just don't see Mandel going for provincial politics. Never met him, but just my own knee-jerk reaction, and the fact he is 67 and people are speculating he is getting to tired for politics.
Kavvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 09:40 AM   #13
GP_Matt
First Line Centre
 
GP_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
Exp:
Default

In my mind, the difference between right and wrong is the order of events.
If the PC's announced their plans and it attracted donations then I think it is okay. If they received donations and then announced plans that benefit the donors then it is shady.

If they accept the money, say nothing and then announce $100 million in funding for a new arena to benefit their largest contributor then it looks criminal.
GP_Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GP_Matt For This Useful Post:
Old 04-26-2013, 10:37 AM   #14
First Lady
First Line Centre
 
First Lady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
Interestingly, I think you could say the same of Mandel. I dunno if either of them would want to operate within the confines of the PCs/WRP though.
There are other parties .... ones that they would likely be a better fit with.

Nenshi could actually pull the Liberals out of their lagging position.

Quote:
Originally Posted by longsuffering View Post
I find this just as distasteful as the situation in Calgary.

There can not be a 'quid pro quo' on donations.
You and I may disagree a great deal, but I want to say I appreciate that you are at least consistent on this.

I found Duane Bratt's comments on the two situations so dissapointing (hypocritical even).... he refered to the PC situation as "lobbying and normal course of politics" and yet the Calgary situation a "smoking gun".
First Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 10:45 AM   #15
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by First Lady View Post
There are other parties .... ones that they would likely be a better fit with.

Nenshi could actually pull the Liberals out of their lagging position.
You have far more faith in the Liberals' electability than I do.

I don't see either of them fitting with the WRP at all (nor do I see any opening there in the near future), but the PCs are so broad-based and short on leadership that I think if one of them were to jump to provincial, PC could be a decent fit.

It doesn't make sense for Nenshi/Mandel to move to provincial unless its to be Premier.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 10:49 AM   #16
First Lady
First Line Centre
 
First Lady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
You have far more faith in the Liberals' electability than I do.
I said, pull them out of lagging position - not into majority..

Nenshi would be 100X better than Raj for the Liberals.
First Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 11:00 AM   #17
Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Moscow
Exp:
Default

What is the actual wrongdoing on the part of the PCs alleged here? I suppose they really should not have accepted the donations if they were explicitly told that the donations were being made with certain expectations? That is how I think that they should have handled the situation anyway.
__________________
"Life of Russian hockey veterans is very hard," said Soviet hockey star Sergei Makarov. "Most of them don't have enough to eat these days. These old players are Russian legends."
Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 11:02 AM   #18
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

I doubt it would make much of a difference. Alberta is so heavily entrenching in the PCs that it would take an outright miracle for them to vote for anyone else.

Years of incompetence obviously isn't enough.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 11:23 AM   #19
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

You are right, Nenshi should run for PC leadership.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:16 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy