Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-18-2013, 08:25 AM   #1721
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nehkara View Post
I agree. I was just playing Devil's Advocate. Certainly not as well as Devils'Advocate though.
Trading down is common but in the NHL rarely do you see teams trade out of the top five. Has it ever happened once? It's usually more common outside the top 10 such as what the Flames did last year.
Erick Estrada is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 08:40 AM   #1722
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Trading down is common but in the NHL rarely do you see teams trade out of the top five. Has it ever happened once? It's usually more common outside the top 10 such as what the Flames did last year.
Within the top 5 it has happened. Don't know if someone has traded out of the top 5
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 08:44 AM   #1723
Dorkmaster
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
Within the top 5 it has happened. Don't know if someone has traded out of the top 5
Islanders trade with the Leafs swapping the 5th and the 7th overall picks in the 2008 draft. Leafs picked Schenn. Then Islanders traded down again with Nashville. Nashville picks Wilson and Islanders drafted Bailey.

Good god those picks turned out to be average.
Dorkmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 08:44 AM   #1724
moon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

In 1999 TB traded out of the first round after having the top pick overall.
moon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 10:01 AM   #1725
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

I think depending on whether they get one of the top centres or Nurse with the 8th pick (yup, I'm just going to assume that's where they are going to finish), Flames will be looking at Hartman and Compher with the late first rounders, both guys just scream Weisbrod types.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 10:19 AM   #1726
shutout
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Exp:
Default

Now the Flames are picking 6th.

Florida Jones
Colorado Drouin
Carolina MacKinnon
Nashville Barkov
Tampa Bay Monahan
Calgary Lindholm

We need to finish bottom 6 to get a centerman.
While Nurse and Nichushkin are good options at 7 and 8 the Flames need to remember how to lose again.
__________________
'Skank' Marden: I play hockey and I fornicate, 'cause those are the two most fun things to do in cold weather. - Mystery Alaska
shutout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 11:06 AM   #1727
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shutout View Post
While Nurse and Nichushkin are good options at 7 and 8 the Flames need to remember how to lose again.
Depending on how he does in interviews at the combine if we can't draft Mackinnon or Barkov I'd rather have Nichushkin. The team needs elite superstar level talent and by all accounts he's that. Of course if he's non-commital then avoid him but I don't think the Flames can pass on Superstar level talent if it's available to them.

The Flames are facing the Ducks next (When was the last time we beat Anaheim?) and then have a 4 Game road trip (5-13-2 on the road)... I don't see much winning happening to close out the season. Maybe Nashville but I'd be surprised if we do better then 1-4 over the final five.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 11:10 AM   #1728
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dorkmaster View Post
Islanders trade with the Leafs swapping the 5th and the 7th overall picks in the 2008 draft. Leafs picked Schenn. Then Islanders traded down again with Nashville. Nashville picks Wilson and Islanders drafted Bailey.

Good god those picks turned out to be average.
Schenn isn't anything special but this example goes to show that teams are better off staying where they are in the top 10 and taking the best player available.
Erick Estrada is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 11:24 AM   #1729
Icon
Franchise Player
 
Icon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

My thoughts provided Florida wins the lottery...

Florida - Jones
Colorado - Drouin
Carolina - MacKinnon
Nashville - Barkov
Tampa Bay - Nichuskin
Calgary - Monahan

St Louis Pick (~20th) - Gauthier (need size in the system, 6'5" 210lb versatile position F)
Pittsburgh Pick (~28-30th) - Bigras/Bowie/Hagg/McCoshen (best dman available)

If a team originally picking later than Calgary bumps them down a position, if none of those top 6 are still around, I guess you take Lindholm or Nurse... I'd be way less excited about it though. If that happened and I was Feaster, I'd be trying to make a trade to move up to get one of these guys. Flames are in desperate need of that next go-to guy.
Icon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 11:28 AM   #1730
Schultzie
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Schultzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon View Post
My thoughts provided Florida wins the lottery...

Florida - Jones
Colorado - Drouin
Carolina - MacKinnon
Nashville - Barkov
Tampa Bay - Nichuskin
Calgary - Monahan

St Louis Pick (~20th) - Gauthier (need size in the system, 6'5" 210lb versatile position F)
Pittsburgh Pick (~28-30th) - Bigras/Bowie/Hagg/McCoshen (best dman available)

If a team originally picking later than Calgary bumps them down a position, if none of those top 6 are still around, I guess you take Lindholm or Nurse... I'd be way less excited about it though. If that happened and I was Feaster, I'd be trying to make a trade to move up to get one of these guys. Flames are in desperate need of that next go-to guy.
I think I'd take Lindholm over Monahan, personally.
Schultzie is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Schultzie For This Useful Post:
Old 04-18-2013, 11:37 AM   #1731
Teroy
Scoring Winger
 
Teroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: B.C.
Exp:
Flames

About Nichushkin.

Despite his strong assets, he needs improvement on his accuracy and he saw limited playing time in the European league this year as a result, though he did improved in the playoffs. When a player with that skill has his minutes reduced it certainly questions his value, though he is still young and must develop like the rest of his draft class nominees.
Teroy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 11:44 AM   #1732
Bourque's Twin
First Line Centre
 
Bourque's Twin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Section 120
Exp:
Default

I really hope the Flames can get into the top 3 because Jones, Drouin, or MacKinnon would really help this franchise out immediately. Monahan would be more of a project.
Drouin is a very dynamic player. I'd love to see the Flames build around him.
Bourque's Twin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 11:47 AM   #1733
Wolven
First Line Centre
 
Wolven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icon View Post
Florida - Jones
Colorado - Drouin
Carolina - MacKinnon
Nashville - Barkov
Tampa Bay - Nichuskin
Calgary - Monahan/Lindholm
I don't think the Flames should be looking at Nurse unless all of the above players are off the board. I'm still not really sold on Nichuskin but if we cannot land one of MacKinnon, Drouin or Barkov then we should be targetting Monahan or Lindholm.
__________________
Wolven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 12:16 PM   #1734
Spinach
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Schenn isn't anything special but this example goes to show that teams are better off staying where they are in the top 10 and taking the best player available.
The difference between something like Shinkaruk (at #9) is big enough to warrant trading up to take a Lindholm or Monahan (at #5), isn't it?

And there appears to be a world of difference between a Shinkaruk & MacKinnon. If it doesn't cost the Flames a guy like Brodie, Feaster should seriously consider moving up from 7th-or- worse to 5th-or-better.
Spinach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 12:24 PM   #1735
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Elias Lindholm.....similar to Backstrom? Better, not as good?
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 12:43 PM   #1736
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

I wonder what would be the chances of the Flames picking up Curtis Lazar with the Blues pick? Seems like he could go anywhere from early to late teens. Would be a nice to pick up future #1 and #2 centers out of a single draft.
Erick Estrada is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 01:08 PM   #1737
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I wonder what would be the chances of the Flames picking up Curtis Lazar with the Blues pick? Seems like he could go anywhere from early to late teens. Would be a nice to pick up future #1 and #2 centers out of a single draft.
Unless we win the lottery I doubt we get a true #1
Bonded is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 01:15 PM   #1738
Dagger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Elias Lindholm.....similar to Backstrom? Better, not as good?
Similar playing styles, but Lindholm is a better prospect heading into the draft than Backstrom was heading into his.

I would say that Lindholm might never hit 100 like Backstrom - due to not having a player like Ovechkin convert so many chances(not saying Ovie makes Backstrom) but Lindholm could definitely be an 80-90 point guy that plays both ends of the ice and in all situations. He's more physical than Nik.

Lindholm is a pretty safe prospect, in that it would be a shock if he's not at the very least a good third line pivot(like Monahan) but he has a higher upside in terms of production than Monahan. Which is why I think Lindholm is a better pick at this point.
Dagger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dagger For This Useful Post:
Old 04-18-2013, 01:26 PM   #1739
Dagger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
Unless we win the lottery I doubt we get a true #1
Monahan, Lindholm and Barkov have a realistic chance of being very good number 1 centres. Maybe they aren't franchise players like Getzlaf, Staal, or Tavares/Stamkos but they can still be a huge part of the core like the Mike Richards', Niklas Backstroms' and Kopitars' of the world.
Dagger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2013, 01:30 PM   #1740
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
In 1999 TB traded out of the first round after having the top pick overall.
In 2002 the 4th overall pick was traded for Fedotenko and two 2nd rounders
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:43 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy