04-02-2013, 11:56 AM
|
#101
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
Maybe, but the 2 prospects that the flames could have gotten from Boston if Iggy said yes were way better than anything from Pitt, St.Louis or what Dallas got.
Looks like Boston would have overpaid for Iggy.
|
agree Boston put together a better package for Iggy for the prospects anyways. JMO.
__________________
|
|
|
04-02-2013, 11:56 AM
|
#102
|
|
One of the Nine
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Sector 2814
|
Well the Stars did sign Jagr for 4.5 mill, as a UFA, and did not have to give up anything besides the cash to get him there.
So even just getting a 2nd for him is a great return.
__________________
"In brightest day, in blackest night / No evil shall escape my sight / Let those who worship evil's might / Beware my power, Green Lantern's light!"
|
|
|
04-02-2013, 11:56 AM
|
#103
|
|
Franchise Player
|
What are the conditions on the pick for this trade?
|
|
|
04-02-2013, 11:57 AM
|
#104
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BH dungeon
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
Jagr has better numbers Iggy has better intangibles
Flames did better return wise but there are lots of factors. Dallas got something when they would have lost him for free
|
In a pure 15 game rental sense it could be argued that their value is equal.
|
|
|
04-02-2013, 11:58 AM
|
#105
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
Maybe, but the 2 prospects that the flames could have gotten from Boston if Iggy said yes were way better than anything from Pitt, St.Louis or what Dallas got.
Looks like Boston would have overpaid for Iggy.
|
Wait, so Bartkowski is all of a sudden way better than Agostino and Hanowski? The only better prospect was Khoklochev. I agree Khokochev is better than either prospect from the Pens, but Bartkowski is worse than the two, so it's almost a wash IMO.
|
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to The Yen Man For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-02-2013, 11:58 AM
|
#106
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
Maybe, but the 2 prospects that the flames could have gotten from Boston if Iggy said yes were way better than anything from Pitt, St.Louis or what Dallas got.
Looks like Boston would have overpaid for Iggy.
|
That is debatable. I personally think that the two college prospects Calgary got are quite good and fill a major need in the organization. Solid hockey trade from a Flames perspective and should help the team over the next couple of years as both players filter into the system this summer and next. I think you got a little excited about Koko because of a YouTube video from prospect camp and haven't considered the potential for the small Russian to fit into a team of already small prospects. The size from the Pittsburgh trade is needed and appreciated.
|
|
|
04-02-2013, 11:59 AM
|
#107
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I can just hear Dallas Now "Damn you Feester, you've deflated the trade market for sellers everywhere."
__________________
"Win the Week"
|
|
|
04-02-2013, 12:01 PM
|
#108
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Down goes brown @DownGoesBrown: I think NHL teams missed the memo on how a seller’s market is supposed to work. #tradecentre
|
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Nsd1 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-02-2013, 12:03 PM
|
#109
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: section 219
|
Jimmy Murphy @MurphysLaw74 4m
Regarding conditional second round pick to Dallas in Jagr trade, it is a second that could turn into first if Bruins go far in playoffs.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to freakinsaprikin For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-02-2013, 12:03 PM
|
#110
|
|
Franchise Player
|
it looks like the media, fans, bloggers, have made up unrealistic trade values
it is what it is
|
|
|
04-02-2013, 12:06 PM
|
#111
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sweden
|
A second round pick and two prospects for an old Jagr rental? Kaching! Well played Stars, well played.
|
|
|
04-02-2013, 12:11 PM
|
#113
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man
Wait, so Bartkowski is all of a sudden way better than Agostino and Hanowski? The only better prospect was Khoklochev. I agree Khokochev is better than either prospect from the Pens, but Bartkowski is worse than the two, so it's almost a wash IMO.
|
Consdiering Bartkowski is already playing pro and ready for a cup of coffee in the bigs at worst he is on par with the other 2 in asset value.
But if you want to think the other 2 are worth more than Bartkowski to feel better about the trade then go ahead.
The Russian kid alone probably has more asset value than both kids from Pitt put together. Its nowhere near a wash.
|
|
|
04-02-2013, 12:13 PM
|
#114
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
It was guaranteed
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapidfire999
Boston GM says it wasn't conditional
|
Chiarelli said it was a hard first, they never said it was for 2013 or 2014 which could have been part of the condition.
|
|
|
04-02-2013, 12:16 PM
|
#115
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Issue is they miscalculated it as a "sellers market".
Yes there are only a few sellers but there are also only a few buyers.
Due to the parity teams are afraid to make a deal that will hurt the future for a short term gain when there are no guarantees you are even going to make the playoffs yet.
The Pens, Bruins, Kings, Hawks and Canucks are the only real buyers because they know they have a chance at the cup. They also aren't going to overpay because they already have good, very deep teams, that are looking at competing for years to come.
The rest of the teams are all looking to more stand pat if anything because they have a shot at the playoffs but nothing is guaranteed.
|
|
|
04-02-2013, 12:27 PM
|
#116
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: BH dungeon
|
Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie now
Conditional 2nd rounder BOS will give DAL in Jagr deal becomes a 1st rounder if BOS wins two playoff series. BTW, deal still not official.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Wronskian For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-02-2013, 12:30 PM
|
#117
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18
Issue is they miscalculated it as a "sellers market".
Yes there are only a few sellers but there are also only a few buyers.
Due to the parity teams are afraid to make a deal that will hurt the future for a short term gain when there are no guarantees you are even going to make the playoffs yet.
The Pens, Bruins, Kings, Hawks and Canucks are the only real buyers because they know they have a chance at the cup. They also aren't going to overpay because they already have good, very deep teams, that are looking at competing for years to come.
The rest of the teams are all looking to more stand pat if anything because they have a shot at the playoffs but nothing is guaranteed.
|
The value of draft picks and prospects had likely never been higher due to the cap. No teams can just sign who they want and the teams are all realizing the value of developing young players. If this was even five years ago, first rounders would be flying all over the place
|
|
|
04-02-2013, 12:41 PM
|
#118
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
Consdiering Bartkowski is already playing pro and ready for a cup of coffee in the bigs at worst he is on par with the other 2 in asset value.
But if you want to think the other 2 are worth more than Bartkowski to feel better about the trade then go ahead.
The Russian kid alone probably has more asset value than both kids from Pitt put together. Its nowhere near a wash.
|
Agree to disagree then. Bartkowski will probably end up max being about as good as Derick Smith. We don't need those type of players as they're a dime a dozen.
|
|
|
04-02-2013, 12:48 PM
|
#119
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
This return does not justify Feaster not getting proper return for Iginla and Bouwmeester. People are simply trying to find something to defend about the people running our team, which I can understand, but there isn't anything. They are doing a bad job
This return doesn't make the Morrow, Murray, Regher, etc. trades just go away. If anything, Feaster probably lowered the market value for forwards by accepting such a crap deal for Iginla
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 AM.
|
|