| 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 11:56 AM | #101 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: STH since 2002      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by kyuss275  Maybe, but the 2 prospects that the flames could have gotten from Boston if Iggy said yes were way better than anything from Pitt, St.Louis or what Dallas got.
 Looks like Boston would have overpaid for Iggy.
 |  
agree Boston put together a better package for Iggy for the prospects anyways. JMO.
		 
				__________________   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 11:56 AM | #102 |  
	| One of the Nine 
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Space Sector 2814      | 
 
			
			Well the Stars did sign Jagr for 4.5 mill, as a UFA, and did not have to give up anything besides the cash to get him there.
 So even just getting a 2nd for him is a great return.
 
				__________________"In brightest day, in blackest night / No evil shall escape my sight / Let those who worship evil's might / Beware my power, Green Lantern's light!"
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 11:56 AM | #103 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			What are the conditions on the pick for this trade?
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 11:57 AM | #104 |  
	| Scoring Winger 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: BH dungeon      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by dino7c  Jagr has better numbers Iggy has better intangibles
 Flames did better return wise but there are lots of factors.  Dallas got something when they would have lost him for free
 |  
In a pure 15 game rental sense it could be argued that their value is equal.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 11:58 AM | #105 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by kyuss275  Maybe, but the 2 prospects that the flames could have gotten from Boston if Iggy said yes were way better than anything from Pitt, St.Louis or what Dallas got.
 Looks like Boston would have overpaid for Iggy.
 |  
Wait, so Bartkowski is all of a sudden way better than Agostino and Hanowski?  The only better prospect was Khoklochev.  I agree Khokochev is better than either prospect from the Pens, but Bartkowski is worse than the two, so it's almost a wash IMO.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to The Yen Man For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 11:58 AM | #106 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by kyuss275  Maybe, but the 2 prospects that the flames could have gotten from Boston if Iggy said yes were way better than anything from Pitt, St.Louis or what Dallas got.
 Looks like Boston would have overpaid for Iggy.
 |  
That is debatable.  I personally think that the two college prospects Calgary got are quite good and fill a major need in the organization.  Solid hockey trade from a Flames perspective and should help the team over the next couple of years as both players filter into the system this summer and next.  I think you got a little excited about Koko because of a YouTube video from  prospect camp and haven't considered the potential for the small Russian to fit into a team of already small prospects.  The size from the Pittsburgh trade is needed and appreciated.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 11:59 AM | #107 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			I can just hear Dallas Now "Damn you Feester, you've deflated the trade market for sellers everywhere."
		 
				__________________"Win the Week"
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 12:01 PM | #108 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			Down goes brown @DownGoesBrown: I think NHL teams missed the memo on how a seller’s market is supposed to work. #tradecentre
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Nsd1 For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 12:03 PM | #109 |  
	| Scoring Winger 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: section 219      | 
 
			
			Jimmy Murphy @MurphysLaw74 4mRegarding conditional second round pick to Dallas in Jagr trade, it is a second that could turn into first if Bruins go far in playoffs.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to freakinsaprikin For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 12:03 PM | #110 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			it looks like the media, fans, bloggers, have made up unrealistic trade values
 it is what it is
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 12:06 PM | #111 |  
	| Powerplay Quarterback 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Sweden      | 
 
			
			A second round pick and two prospects for an old Jagr rental? Kaching! Well played Stars, well played.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 12:11 PM | #113 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by The Yen Man  Wait, so Bartkowski is all of a sudden way better than Agostino and Hanowski?  The only better prospect was Khoklochev.  I agree Khokochev is better than either prospect from the Pens, but Bartkowski is worse than the two, so it's almost a wash IMO. |  
Consdiering Bartkowski is already playing pro and ready for a cup of coffee in the bigs at worst he is on par with the other 2 in asset value.
 
But if you want to think the other 2 are worth more than Bartkowski to feel better about the trade then go ahead.
 
The Russian kid alone probably has more asset value than both kids from Pitt put together. Its nowhere near a wash.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 12:13 PM | #114 |  
	| Franchise Player | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by kyuss275  It was guaranteed |  
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Rapidfire999  Boston GM says it wasn't conditional |  
Chiarelli said it was a hard first, they never said it was for 2013 or 2014 which could have been part of the condition.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 12:16 PM | #115 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Calgary, AB      | 
 
			
			Issue is they miscalculated it as a "sellers market".
 Yes there are only a few sellers but there are also only a few buyers.
 
 Due to the parity teams are afraid to make a deal that will hurt the future for a short term gain when there are no guarantees you are even going to make the playoffs yet.
 
 The Pens, Bruins, Kings, Hawks and Canucks are the only real buyers because they know they have a chance at the cup. They also aren't going to overpay because they already have good, very deep teams, that are looking at competing for years to come.
 
 The rest of the teams are all looking to more stand pat if anything because they have a shot at the playoffs but nothing is guaranteed.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 12:27 PM | #116 |  
	| Scoring Winger 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: BH dungeon      | 
 
			
			Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie nowConditional 2nd rounder BOS will give DAL in Jagr deal becomes a 1st rounder if BOS wins two playoff series. BTW, deal still not official.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to Wronskian For This Useful Post: |  |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 12:30 PM | #117 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Salmon with Arms      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by SuperMatt18  Issue is they miscalculated it as a "sellers market".
 Yes there are only a few sellers but there are also only a few buyers.
 
 Due to the parity teams are afraid to make a deal that will hurt the future for a short term gain when there are no guarantees you are even going to make the playoffs yet.
 
 The Pens, Bruins, Kings, Hawks and Canucks are the only real buyers because they know they have a chance at the cup. They also aren't going to overpay because they already have good, very deep teams, that are looking at competing for years to come.
 
 The rest of the teams are all looking to more stand pat if anything because they have a shot at the playoffs but nothing is guaranteed.
 |  
The value of draft picks and prospects had likely never been higher due to the cap. No teams can just sign who they want and the teams are all realizing the value of developing young players. If this was even five years ago, first rounders would be flying all over the place
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 12:41 PM | #118 |  
	| Franchise Player 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Calgary      | 
 
			
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by kyuss275  Consdiering Bartkowski is already playing pro and ready for a cup of coffee in the bigs at worst he is on par with the other 2 in asset value.
 But if you want to think the other 2 are worth more than Bartkowski to feel better about the trade then go ahead.
 
 The Russian kid alone probably has more asset value than both kids from Pitt put together. Its nowhere near a wash.
 |  
Agree to disagree then.  Bartkowski will probably end up max being about as good as Derick Smith.  We don't need those type of players as they're a dime a dozen.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-02-2013, 12:48 PM | #119 |  
	| #1 Goaltender | 
 
			
			This return does not justify Feaster not getting proper return for Iginla and Bouwmeester. People are simply trying to find something to defend about the people running our team, which I can understand, but there isn't anything. They are doing a bad job
 This return doesn't make the Morrow, Murray, Regher, etc. trades just go away. If anything, Feaster probably lowered the market value for forwards by accepting such a crap deal for Iginla
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:32 PM. | 
 
 
 |