|
View Poll Results: Should Jay Feaster be fired?
|
|
Yes he's the head of the hockey department
|
   
|
445 |
60.30% |
|
No one of his reports are in charge of details like this
|
  
|
107 |
14.50% |
|
No the offers sheet wasn't effective so no loss to the team
|
  
|
186 |
25.20% |
03-01-2013, 01:08 PM
|
#461
|
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
One thing I have to ask, would this thread exist if the Flames were 12-3-4 instead of 7-8-4?
|
No, because the Flames would not need to offersheet O'Reilly in that situation.
|
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:08 PM
|
#462
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Igster
LOL...Press conference does not equal a signed document.
|
LOL. Don't be so sure. You can't pretend to know the inner workings of the NHL and I doubt that the Avs would be prepared to litigate this if the NHL ruled the Avs had matched on the basis of an official team announcement.
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:08 PM
|
#463
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Watch us have to Sven for O'Reilly's RFA rights hahah
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:08 PM
|
#464
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HELPNEEDED
Could Sherman and Feaster be working on a reasonable trade?
|
Reasonable as in Sherman offering lube as he tells Feaster to bend over.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Anduril For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:09 PM
|
#465
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Can't trade for an RFAs rights once an offer sheet is signed.
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:09 PM
|
#466
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HELPNEEDED
Could Sherman and Feaster be working on a reasonable trade?
|
Does an offer sheet negate a trade?
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:09 PM
|
#467
|
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by longsuffering
LOL. Don't be so sure. You can't pretend to know the inner workings of the NHL and I doubt that the Avs would be prepared to litigate this if the NHL ruled the Avs had matched on the basis of an official team announcement.
|
But it might be worth a shot?
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:09 PM
|
#468
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Cool Ville
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anduril
Reasonable as in Sherman offering lube as he tells Feaster to bend over.
|
Yeah. haha.
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:09 PM
|
#469
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HELPNEEDED
Could Sherman and Feaster be working on a reasonable trade?
|
Avs can't trade him if they matched the offer sheet.
Avs can't trade a player who has signed an offer sheet.
Therefore, no trade is even possible.
Come on man, you should know this. They teach it in RMIN 743.
|
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:10 PM
|
#470
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yanda
Yes? This thread is everything to do with a bad GM move and nothing to do with record.
|
I don't buy that. This thread has plenty to do with longer term frustration.
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:10 PM
|
#471
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
Since when is an NHL franchise a public company? And even if it was, business judgment often leads to bypassing opportunities that would generate maximum short term revenue for the sake of stronger long term results.
|
Many of them are owned by public companies. Even then that's besides the point.
If you have someone by the balls then it's your obligation to yank.
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:11 PM
|
#472
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by longsuffering
Enough with the "Avs haven't officially matched" drama.
Their GM held a press conference announcing to the world they were matching. I can't see any scenario where the NHL wouldn't consider that as binding on the Avs.
|
Colorado has to present O'Reilly and the league with a "First Refusal Exercise Notice" to make it official. If they haven't done that then it doesn't matter what they said.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to opendoor For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:11 PM
|
#473
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Hopefully no one can get a hold of Feaster because the Flames took away the company cellphone after dismissing him.
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:12 PM
|
#474
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Where's the poll option for "No, because I enjoy watching this train wreck"?
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:12 PM
|
#475
|
|
Franchise Player
|
The fact that 18% are basically saying no harm no foul just floors me.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:12 PM
|
#476
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: back in the 403
|
If this does turn out to be true, I wonder if Sherman will take some heat from Denver media/fans for making a deal so quickly at a price they clearly didn't want to pay, considering he didn't even have to do it, if it is in fact true.
I know Feaster looks the worst here, especially from our point of view. But Sherman clearly didn't understand the rules either.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sainters7 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:12 PM
|
#477
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Slightly right of left of center
|
Where is the choice that this was a good move. Everyone acts like we'd be drafting the most amazing player ever with our pick, but drafts are a risk and ror is proven. 55 points before 22 is quite awesome for a player. ROR would have been great and it addresses our needs at center
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
- Aristotle
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:12 PM
|
#478
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I voted no because I thought this was just about putting in the offer sheet and losing out. Now that I see all about the waiver fiasco I change my vote to yes.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 1_Flames_Fan For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:13 PM
|
#479
|
|
Draft Pick
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HELPNEEDED
Could Sherman and Feaster be working on a reasonable trade?
|
if the deal is officially matched, avs cant trade him for 365 days.
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2013, 01:13 PM
|
#480
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
Many of them are owned by public companies. Even then that's besides the point.
If you have someone by the balls then it's your obligation to yank.
|
A) Being owned by a public company does not make you one.
B) No, it's not. Look up the Business Judgement Rule.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 AM.
|
|
