10-19-2012, 03:24 AM
|
#1
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: On my metal monster.
|
Court awards family $150,000,000,000 in damages.
This story is severely fataed up. I'll put tags over the youtube video as it shows a burn victim. Basically, this guy rapes an 8 year old kid, then two weeks later pours gasoline over him and sets him on fire. The kid got terminal cancer from all this and eventually died.
Happened in Texas.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 3 Justin 3 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-19-2012, 07:24 AM
|
#2
|
First Line Centre
|
You know what, I think I will be ok with your summary and not watch the video.
I'm sure I will come to the same emotion, if not more, than I have right now.
This looks like a story I would be better off not remembering.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to SeeBass For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-19-2012, 08:46 AM
|
#3
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2012
Exp: 
|
Why not 160,000,000,000?
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 09:18 AM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the dark side of Sesame Street
|
^^^ that would just be greedy.
__________________
"If Javex is your muse…then dive in buddy"
- Surferguy
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Puppet Guy For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-19-2012, 09:47 AM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Stepping aside from the obvious horribleness of it all, does the court not take into consideration net worth or 'ability to pay?'
Presuming of course that the raping arsonist isnt Warren Buffet, Bill Gates or a Qatari Oil Sheik...
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 10:20 AM
|
#6
|
Atomic Nerd
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary
|
It's more of a symbolic gesture. The family will basically not recover anything.
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 10:21 AM
|
#7
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Cool Ville
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
Stepping aside from the obvious horribleness of it all, does the court not take into consideration net worth or 'ability to pay?'
Presuming of course that the raping arsonist isnt Warren Buffet, Bill Gates or a Qatari Oil Sheik...
|
They're not going to get their son back, and their son is not going to get his life back.
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 10:45 AM
|
#8
|
Franchise Player
|
How does the terminal cancer relate to this? Isn't that just a coincidence?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
|
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 10:47 AM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
How does the terminal cancer relate to this? Isn't that just a coincidence?
|
The type of cancer he had was caused by the ongoing skin graf procedures he had to get.
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 11:48 AM
|
#10
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: On my metal monster.
|
It should also be noted, the guy who did this to the kid was never charged with anything, and this in a state where the death penalty exists.
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 11:53 AM
|
#11
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3 Justin 3
It should also be noted, the guy who did this to the kid was never charged with anything, and this in a state where the death penalty exists.
|
Obviously they're aware of the case, and I'm sure they were well aware of the incident when it happened, so I assume they lack the evidence to obtain a criminal conviction, which is a shame.
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 12:13 PM
|
#12
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
Obviously they're aware of the case, and I'm sure they were well aware of the incident when it happened, so I assume they lack the evidence to obtain a criminal conviction, which is a shame.
|
But then the question is, if there is enough evidence to award 150 billion, surely there would enough for a conviction. Are the evidence requirements in civil vs criminal courts different?
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 12:18 PM
|
#13
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Richmond, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanni
But then the question is, if there is enough evidence to award 150 billion, surely there would enough for a conviction. Are the evidence requirements in civil vs criminal courts different?
|
Yes they are.
"Beyond a reasonable doubt" vs "weight of the evidence".
__________________
"For thousands of years humans were oppressed - as some of us still are - by the notion that the universe is a marionette whose strings are pulled by a god or gods, unseen and inscrutable." - Carl Sagan
Freedom consonant with responsibility.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to evman150 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-19-2012, 12:19 PM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanni
But then the question is, if there is enough evidence to award 150 billion, surely there would enough for a conviction. Are the evidence requirements in civil vs criminal courts different?
|
I not a lawyer, I'am sure valo or someone else could explain better, but the answer is yes, the difference is huge. In Criminal court guilt has to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, while in Civil court guilt only has to be proved based on a preponderance of the evidence. Meaning the culprit is more likely guilty then not, but not necessarily guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
__________________
"Man, so long as he remains free, has no more constant and agonizing anxiety than to find, as quickly as possible, someone to worship."
Fyodor Dostoevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kipperfan For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-19-2012, 12:19 PM
|
#15
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanni
But then the question is, if there is enough evidence to award 150 billion, surely there would enough for a conviction. Are the evidence requirements in civil vs criminal courts different?
|
I'm not sure how legal matters in the US differ from those in Canada, but in Canada, the burden of proof is different between criminal and civil matters. I believe in oder to convict someone of a crime you must prove beyong a reasonable doubt that said person commiited the actual crime. Civil matters work more on a balance of probabilities ie:is it more likely thatn not that an offense was committed.
__________________
Bleeding the Flaming C!!!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Crazy Flamer For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-19-2012, 12:20 PM
|
#16
|
First Line Centre
|
He was 13 at the time and is being charged with murder now.
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 12:36 PM
|
#17
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
They're unlikely to receive a dime.
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 12:57 PM
|
#18
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanni
But then the question is, if there is enough evidence to award 150 billion, surely there would enough for a conviction. Are the evidence requirements in civil vs criminal courts different?
|
Beyond a reasonable doubt
vs
Balance of probabilities (i.e. Judge can find that it is 60% likely that he did it, and rule in a civil matter against him).
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 12:59 PM
|
#19
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canehdianman
Beyond a reasonable doubt
vs
Balance of probabilities (i.e. Judge can find that it is 60% likely that he did it, and rule in a civil matter against him).
|
Which actually makes sense based on the repercussions of each.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
10-19-2012, 01:00 PM
|
#20
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Wow, there's no way I can afford to rape an 8 year old kid, pour gasoline on him and set him on fire. I'd better reconsider.
Last edited by TurnedTheCorner; 10-19-2012 at 02:20 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TurnedTheCorner For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:41 PM.
|
|