10-01-2012, 01:52 PM
|
#141
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
|
I like way too many away teams this week.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
10-01-2012, 02:10 PM
|
#142
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOOT
I like way too many away teams this week.
|
The one I think you're off on is Denver @ New England. The Broncos do not match up well against the Pats. I kind of regret putting money on Atlanta. I think the Skins have a shot at home.
I think the home teams with best chances of covering this week are:
STL +1
CAR -3
NE -7
MIN -4.5
IND +7
NO -3.5
Of those 6, the only ones I'd put money down on are probably STL, MIN, and NE.
|
|
|
10-01-2012, 03:50 PM
|
#143
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
|
I just feel that 7pts might be too many in a Manning vs Brady match-up especially with how weak NE pass D is.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 02:32 PM
|
#144
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Pretty respectable week. 6-3 +3. Got in early on a few games because I had a hunch the lines were going to go up/down. Grabbed ATL -3 (hate this bet), PHI +3.5, CLE +10, BAL -4.5, MIN -4.5 CLE went down to +9.5, BAL to -5, and MIN -6. Also noticed NE dropped to -6.5 today, so I jumped on that as well.
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 04:24 PM
|
#145
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
Pretty respectable week. 6-3 +3. Got in early on a few games because I had a hunch the lines were going to go up/down. Grabbed ATL -3 (hate this bet), PHI +3.5, CLE +10, BAL -4.5, MIN -4.5 CLE went down to +9.5, BAL to -5, and MIN -6. Also noticed NE dropped to -6.5 today, so I jumped on that as well.
|
I'm curious why you hate the ATL -3 pick so much after just making it, what changed your mind?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 04:53 PM
|
#146
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Calgary North of 'Merica
|
Pools picks for this week
Mia VS Cin
GB VS Ind
Balt VS KC
Phil VS Pitt (blocked)
Cle VS NYG
Atl VS Wash (iffy)
Chi VS Jax
Sea VS Car
Ten VS Minn
Buf VS SF
Den VS NE (blocked)
SD VS NO (blocked)
Hou VS NYJ
Thoughts?
__________________
Thanks to Halifax Drunk for the sweet Avatar
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 04:59 PM
|
#147
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
|
Had a prety good week this week going 6-2 on th3e spread and 3-0 on moneyline.
Took some early games this week. Cleveland +10, Buffalo +10, Houston -9, Seattle +3, Atlanta -3, GB -7.
|
|
|
10-04-2012, 08:31 AM
|
#148
|
NOT breaking news
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Still can't decide on anything for tonight. Both STL and ARZ's offense really get in their own way and are too unpredictable. This looks like an under, but so many points are being scored in the last two minutes of halfs right now, you really have to have a lot of reasons to bet an under these days.
I'd normally pick against ARZ... but I just don't think STL can do it. Really disappointed in how many points they left on the field against SEA.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire
|
|
|
10-04-2012, 09:15 AM
|
#149
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOOT
I'm curious why you hate the ATL -3 pick so much after just making it, what changed your mind?
|
I didn't like how Atlanta's defense looked against Cam Newton last weekend, and I think the Shanaclan will run the same style of offense, except RGIII is better than Newton. If the Skins pound the rock with Morris and Griffin, and limit Atlanta's big plays, they could win this game.
|
|
|
10-04-2012, 09:22 AM
|
#150
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GirlySports
Still can't decide on anything for tonight. Both STL and ARZ's offense really get in their own way and are too unpredictable. This looks like an under, but so many points are being scored in the last two minutes of halfs right now, you really have to have a lot of reasons to bet an under these days.
I'd normally pick against ARZ... but I just don't think STL can do it. Really disappointed in how many points they left on the field against SEA.
|
I'm taking the Rams. The Cards basically needed special teams plays to beat them both times last year, and I think the Rams are a better team this year than they were a year ago.
|
|
|
10-04-2012, 09:27 AM
|
#151
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Week 4 Picks:
STL +1.5 = WIN
ATL -3 = WIN
PHI +3.5 = WN
CLE +10 = LOSS
BAL -4.5 = LOSS
MIN -4.5 = WIN
NE -6.5 = WIN
SD +3.5 = LOSS
HOU -9 = LOSS
TOTAL = 9 UNITS $92 to win $90
Last edited by rubecube; 10-09-2012 at 01:49 PM.
|
|
|
10-04-2012, 09:33 AM
|
#152
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
|
Also, I wouldn't worry about being on too many away teams. Home teams are something like 11-19 ATS the last two weekends, after cleaning up the previous two weekends. This is why I think betting trends is stupid.
|
|
|
10-04-2012, 10:47 AM
|
#153
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubecube
I didn't like how Atlanta's defense looked against Cam Newton last weekend, and I think the Shanaclan will run the same style of offense, except RGIII is better than Newton. If the Skins pound the rock with Morris and Griffin, and limit Atlanta's big plays, they could win this game.
|
I went with ATL -3 as well and agree with you but at the same time I wonder if having to play Newton will give them an advantage to match up against a similar QB two weeks in a row. Either way I wouldn't be suprised if it was a 60pt total, but I think ATL could win by 7pts+ margin if Ryan doesn't turn the ball over with those big plays. But I guess we will have to wait and see!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
10-04-2012, 03:40 PM
|
#154
|
Crash and Bang Winger
|
I'm going to try St. Louis tonight at +2.5 (1 unit)
2012 to date: 13-14-2 (-2.19 units)
|
|
|
10-04-2012, 04:42 PM
|
#155
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
|
WEEK 5
Baltimore +4.5 (2U) - LOSS
Miami +4.5 (1U) - WIN
Pittsburgh -3 (1U) - LOSS
Atlanta -3 (1U) - WIN
Carolina -3 (1U) - LOSS
Tennessee ML (1U) - LOSS
Buffalo +9.5 (1U) - LOSS
Denver +7 (1U) - LOSS
New Orleans (1U) -3 - WIN
Houston -8 (1U) - LOSS
NY Jets +10 (1U) - WIN
Houston/NY Jets Over 41.5 (2U) - WIN
Betting 14U, Possible Winnings 14.28U
Week 1: Missed
Week 2: 3-3-0 (-0.34U)
Week 3: 5-3-0 (+2.00U)
Week 4: 7-2-1 (+4.63U)
Week 5: 5-7-0 (-2.42U)
TOTAL: 20-15-1 (+3.87U)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
|
Last edited by HOOT; 10-11-2012 at 03:32 PM.
|
|
|
10-04-2012, 05:23 PM
|
#156
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pitt Meadows
|
I am still alive in the winners pool in one of my football pools and we are down to less then 10 people now after starting off with over 300. I am still alive and if I win I get a nice chunk of change. So just wanted to ask who you think would be my best bet this week.
Teams I have picked are:
Cleveland
Baltimore
Buffalo
Cincinatti
Spread is included in the winners pool, that is why I am still alive after picking Cleveland in week 1.
I have been leaning towards Houston, but -8.5 on the road scares me a little.
|
|
|
10-04-2012, 06:31 PM
|
#157
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOOT
WEEK 5
Baltimore +4.5 (2U)
Atlanta -3 (1U)
Denver +7 (1U)
New Orleans -3.5 (1U) - They gotta win one game right?
Miami +4.5 (1U)
Betting 6U, Possible Winnings 5.46U
Week 1: Missed
Week 2: 3-3-0 (-0.34U)
Week 3: 5-3-0 (+2.00U)
Week 4: 7-2-1 (+4.63U)
Week 5: 0-0-0 (in progress)
TOTAL: 15-8-1 (+6.29U)
Looking at the ARZ/STL game as well, the line seems to be moving around a bit the last few hours so I may wait til game time. Won't be able to watch tonight so may not bet at all, leaning towards ARZ.
Still thinking my ML bet of the week will be on Tenessee sitting at +210, but we will see, there is small part of me that likes a Cutler choke job in the JAC game. Also looking at HOU -8.5 on the Monday nighter. I'm going golfing Sunday morning so may make more bets from the course.
|
I dunno. I think I would still pick the Bears to win if Jason Campbell started. Jacksonville's pass rush is all kinds of bad and despite what most think of Cutler you saw on Monday what he can do with time in the pocket. However, if Cutler did poop the bed this week, you would have to rely on Gabbert to beat up the Bears secondary on the other side of the ball as they will most definitely be playing a heavy run defense against the only threat the Jaguars have in MJD.
The Jags would really have to outperform the Bears in every asset of the game to win that one, not just a bad game from Cutler
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DropIt For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-04-2012, 06:36 PM
|
#158
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DropIt
I dunno. I think I would still pick the Bears to win if Jason Campbell started. Jacksonville's pass rush is all kinds of bad and despite what most think of Cutler you saw on Monday what he can do with time in the pocket. However, if Cutler did poop the bed this week, you would have to rely on Gabbert to beat up the Bears secondary on the other side of the ball as they will most definitely be playing a heavy run defense against the only threat the Jaguars have in MJD.
The Jags would really have to outperform the Bears in every asset of the game to win that one, not just a bad game from Cutler
|
The worst part of it all is I meant to say Chicago choke job and put Cutler.  I was just thinking coming off a big game vs the Cowboys on a Monday night they may get caught standing around a bit. But yes the clear choice is Chicago in that game I just like trying to find that one upset.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
10-06-2012, 11:22 PM
|
#159
|
Appealing my suspension
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Just outside Enemy Lines
|
I have a parlay of Baltimore, New York Giants, and Chicago money line 1 unit to win 1.5 units.
Another long shot of Atlanta/Wash over 51.5, Green Bay -7 over Indy, and SF/Buf under 45.5. One unit to win A shade under 6.
__________________
"Some guys like old balls"
Patriots QB Tom Brady
|
|
|
10-07-2012, 09:52 AM
|
#160
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
|
Took a longshot parlay trying to sniff out the upsets.
KC +220
Titans +210
Miami + 195
GB-7 (-115)
Parlayed 1 unit into ... alot of units
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:38 PM.
|
|