Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius
So Knowlton made this up, and since that time, nobody familiar with the area has questioned that this boulder suddenly sprouted pictographs and petroglyphs until now?
Does the media research anything before disseminating it to the public?
|
There is something fishy about this whole situation.
The RCMP say that there are no reports that any pictographs ever existed on the rock. How the eff did it end up in a national newspaper with multiple sources confirming the existence of the pictographs? Was there no research centre, university, government department etc etc that had any knowledge of this?
This guy was doing "research" on this rock but had no permits or documentation of any kind? Nothing from any official or academic sources as to the existence of this? How did the newspaper not know it was all made up? I can't imagine this is a coverup, even if natives in Canada have covered up and destroyed research before, in order to continue the alleged falsehood that they were the first ones here.
So if this was literally just one man and a rock and the National Post published this story then that is a total joke. The follow up article is so vague on the details though it is hard to tell what really happened.