09-18-2012, 01:00 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#21
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
				
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2006 
				Location: Calgary AB 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
				 
				
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  undercoverbrother
					 
				 
				lol, you know it's more than just a land squabble right? 
  
The province has shown that is it not interested in being in confederation time and time again, perhaps the threat of expulsion would stop this nonsence. 
  
I have experienced the "Quebec First" mentallity first hand. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
You're doing exactly what the PQ wants. Their whole purpose in power right now is to thumb their nose at English Canada at every opportunity in order to provoke responses such as yours to try to convince the over two thirds of the Province that refused to vote for the seperatists that English Canada hates them. Fact remains that most of Quebekers wants nothing of the sort, hence the election results. Therefore the PQ is reduced to tactics like this to try and elicit more Quebec nationalism.
  
I think English Canada's reponse should simply be to ignore these stunts and carry on as normal. As time goes on and Quebec's population and economy continue to stagnate relative to the rest of the country, their ability to hold the rest of us hostage over money and unity debates gets ever more diminished. Futhermore the more stanuch PQers are of the older generation anyways. The unity problem is a problem that solves itself overtime as long as English Canadians don't repsond by being bigoted towards Quebekers by treating the entire province's people as if they all voted for those PQ clowns. Doing that might just push enough of them over the edge and back into the soverignty camp.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				  
				
					
						Last edited by Cowboy89; 09-18-2012 at 01:05 PM.
					
					
				
			
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	
		
			| 
				
					The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Cowboy89 For This Useful Post:
				
				
				
			 | 
			 
BlackEleven,
 
 CofR,
 
 jammies,
 
 MarchHare,
 
 MolsonInBothHands,
 
 octothorp,
 
 OffsideSpecialist,
 
 onetwo_threefour,
 
 Rathji,
 
 SeeBass,
 
 troutman,
 
 valo403,
 
 vanisleflamesfan,
 
 zuluking
  | 
		 
	 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
 
	
		
			| 
				
					The Following User Says Thank You to Knut For This Useful Post:
				
				
				
			 | 
			 | 
		 
	 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:07 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#23
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2012 
				Location: Sylvan Lake 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  Cowboy89
					 
				 
				You're doing exactly what the PQ wants. Their whole purpose in power right now is to thumb their nose at English Canada at every opportunity in order to provoke responses such as yours to try to convince the over two thirds of the Province that refused to vote for the seperatists that English Canada hates them. Fact remains that most of Quebekers wants nothing of the sort, hence the election results. Therefore the PQ is reduced to tactics like this to try and elicit more Quebec nationalism. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
 
Then perhaps the other parties should get together and form a coalition gov't (although I am not sure of the law in Quebec when it comes to this).  The Libs and CQA would have more seats.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993 
 
Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
			 
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:07 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#24
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 In the Sin Bin 
			
			
			
			
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  Hesla
					 
				 
				I am pertubed like the rest of us at this, but where would we get our Goalies and most of our olympic medal haul from ? 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
We'll we would save 7 Billion dollars a year. 
Invest it in sports?
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:08 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#25
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2012 
				Location: Sylvan Lake 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
				 
				
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  Cowboy89
					 
				 
				You're doing exactly what the PQ wants. Their whole purpose in power right now is to thumb their nose at English Canada at every opportunity in order to provoke responses such as yours to try to convince the over two thirds of the Province that refused to vote for the seperatists that English Canada hates them. Fact remains that most of Quebekers wants nothing of the sort, hence the election results. Therefore the PQ is reduced to tactics like this to try and elicit more Quebec nationalism. 
  
I think English Canada's reponse should simply be to ignore these stunts and carry on as normal. As time goes on and Quebec's population and economy continue to stagnate relative to the rest of the country, their ability to hold the rest of us hostage over money and unity debates gets ever more diminished. Futhermore the more stanuch PQers are of the older generation anyways. The unity problem is a problem that solves itself overtime as long as English Canadians don't repsond by being bigoted towards Quebekers by treating the entire province's people as if they all voted for those PQ clowns. Doing that might just push enough of them over the edge and back into the soverignty camp. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
So you approach is to continue with status qou and/or put our heads in the sand.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993 
 
Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
			 
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:09 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#26
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
				
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2006 
				Location: Calgary AB 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  undercoverbrother
					 
				 
				Then perhaps the other parties should get together and form a coalition gov't (although I am not sure of the law in Quebec when it comes to this). The Libs and CQA would have more seats. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
They most certainly will should the PQ try for another referendum vote. That's why all the PQ can do to advance soverignty in their minds is to try and piss off English Canadians in every way imaginable.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:14 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#27
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2012 
				Location: Sylvan Lake 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  Cowboy89
					 
				 
				They most certainly will should the PQ try for another referendum vote. That's why all the PQ can do to advance soverignty in their minds is to try and piss off English Canadians in every way imaginable. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
I believe that forcing the issue might get this resolved once and for all.  Remember that the First Nations have a lot of land in quebec.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993 
 
Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
			 
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:15 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#28
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
				
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2006 
				Location: Calgary AB 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  undercoverbrother
					 
				 
				So you approach is to continue with status qou and/or put our heads in the sand. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
It will be a more effective strategy than jackbooting them around and forcing them to leave on our dime. Bottomline, Quebec's not leaving the country while owing up to their share of the national debt, hence the whole 'soveriegnty-association' BS bandied about in the 90s. Since that's an unacceptable position from an English Canada point of view, we might as well let the movement run it's course into the obscurity of history without going through another national unity crisis that devalues our dollar and undermines foriegn capital investment (which will impact Alberta's economy severely).
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	
		
			| 
				
					The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cowboy89 For This Useful Post:
				
				
				
			 | 
			 | 
		 
	 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:17 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#29
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Playboy Mansion Poolboy 
			
			
			
				
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2004 
				Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:20 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#30
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2012 
				Location: Sylvan Lake 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  Cowboy89
					 
				 
				It will be a more effective strategy than jackbooting them around and forcing them to leave on our dime. Bottomline, Quebec's not leaving the country while owing up to their share of the national debt, hence the whole 'soveriegnty-association' BS bandied about in the 90s. Since that's an unacceptable position from an English Canada point of view, we might as well let the movement run it's course into the obscurity of history without going through another national unity crisis that devalues our dollar and undermines foriegn capital investment (which will impact Alberta's economy severely). 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
See this is where you and I differ.  I don't believe it will "run it's course", while the influence might ebb and flow, I believe it will always be there.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993 
 
Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
			 
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:23 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#31
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Atomic Nerd 
			
			
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2004 
				Location: Calgary 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  ken0042
					 
				 
				Or a to expand on this and ask a better question, how many American products never come to Canada because the company doesn't want to deal with having to come up with French labels for everything? 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
None. They need to print new packages and boxes that comply to Canadian standards and metric measures anyway. It costs them almost nothing to add a French translation.
 
The cost is in distribution, licensing, compliance, rights, food standards, and other legal concerns, etc.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				  
				
					
						Last edited by Hack&Lube; 09-18-2012 at 01:29 PM.
					
					
				
			
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:28 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#32
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
				
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Jul 2010 
				Location: Calgary - Centre West 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  Old Yeller
					 
				 
				In the 2012-2013 year, the following provinces will receive equalization payments:  - Quebec ($7.391 billion)
 
- Ontario ($3.261 billion)
 
- Manitoba ($1.671 billion)
 
- New Brunswick ($1.495 billion)
 
- Nova Scotia ($1.268 billion)
 
- Prince Edward Island ($337 million)
 
 I wonder if even a tenth of the separatist population realizes how much money they get a year.  
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
I thought Newfoundland was missing, but indeed it isn't:  http://www.ctvnews.ca/historic-first...ation-1.339239
 
Ontario is now a 'have-not' province and N.L. is a 'have' province. Awesome news for the Newfies, good on 'em.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				-James 
GO FLAMES GO.
	Quote: 
	
	
		| 
			
				 
					Originally Posted by Azure
					
				 
				Typical dumb take. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
			 
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:31 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#33
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
			
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  undercoverbrother
					 
				 
				haha, bad manners.  I view it as something more. 
  
What is your suggestion to resolve this issue? 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
What exactly do you view it as that would justify an action that is virtually unheard of, not just in modern times, but ever. 
 
Let's be real about what you're suggesting, the willful ceding of a massive land area that is not some sort of colonial outpost, but directly attached to Canada, in which the majority of the population desires to be a part of Canada. Explain to me how that is not the most asinine suggestion imaginable.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:31 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#34
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
				
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2008 
				Location: Calgary 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			Oh, whatever - it's always the same discussion. Please, PLEASE, separate already... and I hope we are next.   
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:35 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#35
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
				
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2002 
				Location: Calgary, AB 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
				 
				
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  Cowboy89
					 
				 
				It will be a more effective strategy than jackbooting them around and forcing them to leave on our dime. Bottomline, Quebec's not leaving the country while owing up to their share of the national debt, hence the whole 'soveriegnty-association' BS bandied about in the 90s. Since that's an unacceptable position from an English Canada point of view, we might as well let the movement run it's course into the obscurity of history without going through another national unity crisis that devalues our dollar and undermines foriegn capital investment (which will impact Alberta's economy severely). 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
You're right. They aren't getting cut loose, unless they take their debts and they sure won't take them willingly. Temporary instability could be worth calling their bluff once and for all though. The presence of the Quebec question will always effect Canada, just as the Basque question effects Spain.
  
However, this disdain is over 200 years old, and it isnt going anywhere. Ignoring the whining could be just as capable of causing new complaints. Attempting to let it run its course by ignoring it and not giving them anything more special can easily be spun to a "they don't respect us and take us seriously" argument, that can provoke a whole new generation. 
  
Its a chess game with them that has to be played just right. I'd prefer to play with the purse strings and watch the fun unfold.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:36 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#36
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 In the Sin Bin 
			
			
			
			
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  VladtheImpaler
					 
				 
				Oh, whatever - it's always the same discussion. Please, PLEASE, separate already... and I hope we are next.    
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
Only if BC comes with... Screw being land locked.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:37 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#37
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2012 
				Location: Sylvan Lake 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  valo403
					 
				 
				What exactly do you view it as that would justify an action that is virtually unheard of, not just in modern times, but ever.  
  
Let's be real about what you're suggesting, the willful ceding of a massive land area that is not some sort of colonial outpost, but directly attached to Canada, in which the majority of the population desires to be a part of Canada. Explain to me how that is not the most asinine suggestion imaginable. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
So no country have ever peacefully split up in modern times......right.
  
What i am suggesting is calling a bluff, drawing all parties to the table and starting a dialogue.   It might be what is needed to wake up the rest of the populace.
  
If you want to discuss this we can, but try to dial down the rhetoric and personal attacks.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993 
 
Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
			 
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:37 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#38
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
				
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2002 
				Location: Calgary, AB 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  polak
					 
				 
				Only if BC comes with... Screw being land locked. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
And Saskatchewan... we need them to balance out the lower mainland NDP vote.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:39 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#39
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
				
			
			
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			i am assuming that we are all meeting somewhere to burn stuff down and we will then strap bombs to our chests......
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				If I do not come back avenge my death
			 
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		
			
			 
			09-18-2012, 01:40 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#40
			
		 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			 Franchise Player 
			
			
			
				
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2006 
				Location: Calgary AB 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  Thunderball
					 
				 
				However, this disdain is over 200 years old, and it isnt going anywhere. Ignoring the whining could be just as capable of causing new complaints. Attempting to let it run its course by ignoring it and not giving them anything more special can easily be spun to a "they don't respect us and take us seriously" argument, that can provoke a whole new generation.  
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 
I'm really not concerned about sucessive generations of Quebekers. Once again that problem solves itself. Demographically they are dying off so long as the PQ continues to badger any and all newcomers that don't speak French, and the people that do live there continue to experience a negative birth rate. They are shrinking into obscurity.
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
 
 
 
	 
	
		 
	 
 
 
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
		
	
		 
		Posting Rules
	 | 
 
	
		
		You may not post new threads 
		You may not post replies 
		You may not post attachments 
		You may not edit your posts 
		 
		
		
		
		
		HTML code is Off 
		 
		
	  | 
 
 
	 | 
	
		
	 | 
 
 
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:12 AM. 
		 
	 
 
 | 
 
 
 
     |