Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-22-2012, 09:58 PM   #361
Swayze11
something else haha
 
Swayze11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
So correct me if I am wrong, but by playing in the USHL next year and going to college afterwords allows him to use the loophole to become UFA like Schultz and Wheeler?
Any college kid can do that. I can see that loophole being closed in the next CBA though.
__________________

Swayze11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 09:59 PM   #362
CaramonLS
Retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Ryan S. Clark ‏@ryan_s_clark USHL spokesman Brian Werger just told me Calgary's Mark Jankowski (Prov) will be the first-ever first round pick to come play in the league.
I'm not quite sure how this would be good for his development.

I'd rather him play in the OHL personally.
CaramonLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 10:00 PM   #363
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
So correct me if I am wrong, but by playing in the USHL next year and going to college afterwords allows him to use the loophole to become UFA like Schultz and Wheeler?
pretty certain you are correct;
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 10:00 PM   #364
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
So correct me if I am wrong, but by playing in the USHL next year and going to college afterwords allows him to use the loophole to become UFA like Schultz and Wheeler?
Unless that loop hole gets closed in the next CBA, yes. However, listening to his interview on the Fan, he talked about looking forward to playing for the Flames. I hope that excitement sticks around.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 10:02 PM   #365
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
I've been hoping the Flames would take him for months
You too?
http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=118070
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to T@T For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2012, 10:02 PM   #366
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swayze11 View Post
Any college kid can do that. I can see that loophole being closed in the next CBA though.
the key is playing one year of junior after being drafted, and then heading to college. Also, he is drafted under the current CBA, so it doesn't matter what the new CBA rules are
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Canada 02 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2012, 10:02 PM   #367
opendoor
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
So correct me if I am wrong, but by playing in the USHL next year and going to college afterwords allows him to use the loophole to become UFA like Schultz and Wheeler?
If that doesn't get changed in the next CBA, then yes. NCAA players can become UFAs 4 years after being drafted.

It's not necessarily that big of a risk though. The majority of successful NCAA players sign with their drafting team without incident.
opendoor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 10:03 PM   #368
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaramonLS View Post
I'm not quite sure how this would be good for his development.

I'd rather him play in the OHL personally.
If he plays in the OHL he becomes ineligible for the NCAA. I saw a quote where he talked about how you can't start college too late but you can start it too early.

Also I have nothing but faith in Jim Montgomery being his coach, in fact it makes me like it even more.
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 10:04 PM   #369
Reign of Fire
First Line Centre
 
Reign of Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Reppin' the C in BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayP View Post
I really hate statements like these.

When your assistant GM is making the call on who they're drafting after one viewing it's not a good thing. Pretty much a slap in the face to all the scouts who watch hundreds of games all year. You can't accurately scout a guy in that short a time period. I'm sure the Flames did their due diligence afterwards, but when the assistant GM is making statements like that it's going to be pretty tough to override that first impression.
Isn't the Assistant GM a former scout himself and overlooks the scouting department
__________________
"There are no asterisks in this life, only scoreboards." - Ari Gold

12 13 14 2 34
Reign of Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Reign of Fire For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2012, 10:05 PM   #370
iamca
First Line Centre
 
iamca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Exp:
Default

Flames could have taken him in the 3rd round, brutal pick in the first.
iamca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 10:05 PM   #371
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by opendoor View Post
If that doesn't get changed in the next CBA, then yes. NCAA players can become UFAs 4 years after being drafted.

It's not necessarily that big of a risk though. The majority of successful NCAA players sign with their drafting team without incident.
the new CBA won't change a thing. Jankowski was drafted under the current CBA rules.

The same thing happened to 2002 and 2003 draftees. The old, old CBA applied to them, not the current CBA rules
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 10:05 PM   #372
c.t.ner
First Line Centre
 
c.t.ner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary in Heart, Ottawa in Body
Exp:
Default

Not going to lie, I was disappointed in the trade down and then the pick. But after spending some time away from the initial irrational reaction, I really, really like the pick. Couple of small things stand out.

1) The name printed on the jersey, basically means the Flames were going after this kid well before TT and Maatta were available at 14.
2) Feaster's comment about "Weisbrod saying don't trade the 1st rounder, we have a player we want this year." Means that the Flames weren't a 100% sold on the draft class and were willing to trade it for something else until they saw this kid. Considering the scouting the Flames have done in the past two years, that's some impressive pedigree.
3) Now that I understand this was the kid the flames wanted all along, trading down to 21 and getting a second was a fantastic play. As fan with no inside knolwedge I'll admit I didn't enjoy that, but whatever that's the fun of the draft.

Kid sounds like a good pick and I think we may have found a diamond in the rough.
c.t.ner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to c.t.ner For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2012, 10:06 PM   #373
CaramonLS
Retired
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
Not to rain on anyones parade, as I think about this pick.

How many huge skill guys grow into their body and become what I am hoping for his upside?

Mario was big and he was Mario for fatas sake, so that doesn't apply to this situation.

Rick Nash was always good, no lower league baloney.

I can't think of any skill player who is huge and came out of nowhere. Penner maybe.

Has hockey been as heavily scouted ever as these days?

Jamie Benn is the only comparison I am seeing. Also Eric Daze.
Zajac is one that comes to mind - not a superstar, but same sized and came out of nowhere.
CaramonLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 10:06 PM   #374
Rhettzky
Franchise Player
 
Rhettzky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Section 222
Exp:
Default

I like the pick. Haven't seen him play but back when Feaster had the season ticket holder meeting he mentioned a player that would take a bit longer to develop but he believed would be one of the best players of this draft class. So they seem to have know for quite a while that this was their guy.

Dropping seven spots was risky if they truly believed that this kid was going in the first round but the payoff is a pretty high second round pick that sounds like it is going to have a decent pick available as everyone has been saying the top fifty is really good but beyond that it gets weak.

Plus our hockey guys looked amped at the pick. Wisebrod looked like a kid on christmas morning when they showed the Flames table before their pick. And the rest just looked giddy. Really great to see a bunch of guys that just love this kind of stuff.
__________________
Go Flames Go!!
Rhettzky is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Rhettzky For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2012, 10:07 PM   #375
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T@T View Post
High 5

Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 10:07 PM   #376
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

He certainly has the frame to become a big kid.

If they want him to play at 220lbs, he'll be a beast.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 10:08 PM   #377
mikephoen
#1 Goaltender
 
mikephoen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
He certainly seems more high risk but not sure what makes him more high reward than other guys at his draft position.

What about him makes him more likely to be a #1 center than say Gaunce or Teravainen? What makes him more likely to be an impact player than Maata?
The fact Teravainen isn't a center is one thing that makes him more likely to be a #1 center.
mikephoen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 10:09 PM   #378
Alberta_Beef
Franchise Player
 
Alberta_Beef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayP View Post
I really hate statements like these.

When your assistant GM is making the call on who they're drafting after one viewing it's not a good thing. Pretty much a slap in the face to all the scouts who watch hundreds of games all year. You can't accurately scout a guy in that short a time period. I'm sure the Flames did their due diligence afterwards, but when the assistant GM is making statements like that it's going to be pretty tough to override that first impression.
Perhaps it would be in your best interest to watch the interviews and such before making posts about the pick being a "slap in the face to the scouts" because had you seen the interviews you woudl have heard that Button told Weisbrod to go see Jankowski play.

Seems to me like Jankowski was the scouts pick and they wanted to make sure Weisbrod saw him.
Alberta_Beef is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Alberta_Beef For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2012, 10:09 PM   #379
Barnission
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mission, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamca View Post
Flames could have taken him in the 3rd round, brutal pick in the first.
Woah, can I have that time machine of yours?
Barnission is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 10:09 PM   #380
Swayze11
something else haha
 
Swayze11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canada 02 View Post
the key is playing one year of junior after being drafted, and then heading to college. Also, he is drafted under the current CBA, so it doesn't matter what the new CBA rules are
Good to know, I thought it would be whenever he signed the CBA at the time would apply.
__________________

Swayze11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:23 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy