Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-22-2012, 08:19 PM   #121
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post
Feaster says CHL is still an option. Saginaw Spirit hold his rights.

Really hope they convince him to go CHL route.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:20 PM   #122
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lt.Spears View Post
Just like you, but the collective CP braintrust will now claim him the steal of the draft and an excellent choice.
I've been hoping the Flames would take him for months
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Caged Great For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2012, 08:20 PM   #123
flamesaresmokin
Lifetime Suspension
 
flamesaresmokin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philtopia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swayze11 View Post
NHL Comparsion: Jason Spezza.

Sign me up!
The big difference was spezza was tearing up major junior when he was drafted not a third rate high school league.
flamesaresmokin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:20 PM   #124
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2012, 08:20 PM   #125
mikephoen
#1 Goaltender
 
mikephoen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayP View Post
I really hate statements like these.

When your assistant GM is making the call on who they're drafting after one viewing it's not a good thing. Pretty much a slap in the face to all the scouts who watch hundreds of games all year. You can't accurately scout a guy in that short a time period. I'm sure the Flames did their due diligence afterwards, but when the assistant GM is making statements like that it's going to be pretty tough to override that first impression.
If you listened to the interview, Weisbrod was sent to check him out because Button and the other scouts were already excited about him.
mikephoen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:21 PM   #126
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesaresmokin View Post
The big difference was spezza was tearing up major junior when he was drafted not a third rate high school league.
Jankowski was two days away from being eligible for for next years draft, that's how old he is.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MrMastodonFarm For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2012, 08:21 PM   #127
saskflames69
#1 Goaltender
 
saskflames69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayP View Post
LMAO. Weisbrod wasn't even the GM of the Magic yet when Bergeron was drafted.

The amount of credit that guy gets for no results (yet hopefully) is ridiculous.
Wow, Weisbrod manages a basketball team too? Is there anything this guy can't do?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
If ever there was an oilering
Connor Zary will win the Hart Trophy in 2027.
saskflames69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:21 PM   #128
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

The OHL is a softer league than the NCAA. He could light it up their me thinks but the NCAA could be good for him to play against tougher competition.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:21 PM   #129
flames_1987
#1 Springs1 Fan
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: -
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lt.Spears View Post
Just like you, but the collective CP braintrust will now claim him the steal of the draft and an excellent choice.
No, people will just say it could be a great pick or it could not be. The fact is, nobody on here knows hardly anything about this kid or the rest of the draft class. The people taking the radical opinions on this move are the ones denouncing it.
flames_1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:22 PM   #130
Captain_Obvious
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lt.Spears View Post
Just like you, but the collective CP braintrust will now claim him the steal of the draft and an excellent choice.
What a bunch of sheep huh? Especially when they could be like you and moan and complain about things they know nothing about like a broken record.

You are so edgy.
Captain_Obvious is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Captain_Obvious For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2012, 08:22 PM   #131
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flames_1987 View Post
This is classic. I'm pretty sure nobody is complaining about our 2011 Draft class right now, and lord knows there was a lot back then. Stop trying to pretend you're an expert on this at all and you know anything about the player drafted.
not <m>any canadian high schoolers have been drafted, let alone make it to the NHL.

btw, Baertschi was very much like Tuevo. Highly ranked, but slipped a bit. People were very happy with that pick last year.
oldschoolcalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:22 PM   #132
SeoulFire
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 서울특별시
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flames_1987 View Post
The Flames are in a position where if you're not picking top 5, I say you go for the high ceiling, high risk/ high reward guy. People on here complained about the Flames needing top end talent, it seems pretty unanimous among the people who actually watch these young players for a living, that this kid has an incredibly high ceiling.
Perhaps this kid is a top five pick - if he were a few days younger. Next year will be really interesting to see how he does. It could well be that we got a top 5 (ie 2013 draft) at 21.

I love the risk/reward aspect.
SeoulFire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:22 PM   #133
Freeway
Franchise Player
 
Freeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

You don't send John Weisbrod anywhere in a snow storm unless you've already checked him out yourselves.
__________________
PHWA Member // Managing Editor @ FlamesNation // Author of "On The Clock: Behind The Scenes with the Calgary Flames at the NHL Draft" // Twitter

"Does a great job covering the Flames" - Elliotte Friedman
Freeway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:22 PM   #134
bluck
First Line Centre
 
bluck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver :(
Exp:
Default

From Roto
The Calgary Flames arguably made the first truly "off the board" selection by grabbing Mark Jankowski with the 21st pick.
Jankowski has some hockey roots, but it didn't help him draw a ton of attention - at least from a first-round perspective. He's six-foot-two but just 170 lbs. so he'll probably take quite a while to make it to the NHL level. One thing he does have is scoring instincts, however, particularly when it comes to passing. Time will tell if Flames GM Jay Feaster ends up looking shrewd or silly by making this pick. Jun. 22 - 9:55 pm et
bluck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:23 PM   #135
kipperfan
Franchise Player
 
kipperfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JayP View Post
I really hate statements like these.

When your assistant GM is making the call on who they're drafting after one viewing it's not a good thing. Pretty much a slap in the face to all the scouts who watch hundreds of games all year. You can't accurately scout a guy in that short a time period. I'm sure the Flames did their due diligence afterwards, but when the assistant GM is making statements like that it's going to be pretty tough to override that first impression.
I don't think that's how it went down at all. Much more likely Button and his scouts did their due diligence on Jankowski and then called out the AGM to take a peak. Either way I like the pick, we need high risk/high reward types IMO.

The really interesting thing I'd like to know more about (and really wish Miller had asked about when he had the chance) is the potential trading of the 1st round pick. The way Feaster phrased his conversation with Weisbrod it sounded like trading the pick was basically in the bag until Weisbrod viewed Jankowski. Would love to know who and/or what Feaster had planned to trade it for.
__________________
"Man, so long as he remains free, has no more constant and agonizing anxiety than to find, as quickly as possible, someone to worship."

Fyodor Dostoevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
kipperfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:24 PM   #136
JiriHrdina
I believe in the Pony Power
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesaresmokin View Post
That's what's mind boggling about using a first round pick on the kid......

I guess so long as he has that winning attitude nothing else matters.
More teams are drafting from other leagues. I like it as it shows they are being very complete in their scouting
JiriHrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:24 PM   #137
Dorkmaster
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

I love this pick. When we traded out of 14, I was pretty disappointed, but this is a very interesting pick. High upside, center, biggest asset is hockey sense and young. I wouldn't be too worried about his level of competition, he's got time to develop.
Dorkmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:24 PM   #138
JayP
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diemenz View Post
People hear Feaster says let's win now.
People complain.
People want a rebuild.
Calgary drafts a player who will come in right when the older players contracts expire and the rebuild can start.
People complain.
All of a sudden people want to win now.

I'm beginning to think some people just like to complain no matter what happens.
You explained exactly why people are complaining.

We say we're going for it now and then draft a major project that's not going to be an impact NHLer for likely 5-6 years if he pans. The key being impact player - he could be in the show in 3-4, but not contributing in a big way until 5-6. We need these draft picks to pan out while Iggy/Kipper are still here if we plan on riding them out - otherwise we aren't competing for anything.

There were quality players that slipped to 14 that were a lot more NHL ready and fit in a lot more with the direction this team is going. This would be a great pick if we were rebuilding. But, unfortunately, we aren't heading in that direction.
JayP is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JayP For This Useful Post:
Old 06-22-2012, 08:25 PM   #139
flamesaresmokin
Lifetime Suspension
 
flamesaresmokin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Philtopia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm View Post
Jankowski was two days away from being eligible for for next years draft, that's how old he is.

And this somehow validates taking an enormous risk on a first round pick? We're hardly in a position to be passing up high probability players in the first round at this point.

If he is actually so good that he'll be "the player of the draft" in a few years why did so many teams pass him up as well and why was he so far off the board?
flamesaresmokin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2012, 08:26 PM   #140
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesaresmokin View Post
And this somehow validates taking an enormous risk on a first round pick? We're hardly in a position to be passing up high probability players in the first round at this point.

If he is actually so good that he'll be "the player of the draft" in a few years why did so many teams pass him up as well and
So you wanted to go the safer route?

Okay, interesting. For some reason if we took a crash and bang winger with our pick a guy like you would have exploded.
Quote:
why was he so far off the board?
There is no such thing as "the board".
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:32 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy