Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-15-2012, 01:31 PM   #1181
PegCityFlamesFan
First Line Centre
 
PegCityFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

Thanks for the updates Troutman, you should be the only one posting in here as it has turned into a pissing match.
__________________
PegCityFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 01:36 PM   #1182
Puppet Guy
Franchise Player
 
Puppet Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: the dark side of Sesame Street
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PegCityFlamesFan View Post
Thanks for the updates Troutman, you should be the only one posting in here as it has turned into a pissing match.
Troutman's the only source of actual information in this thread.
__________________
"If Javex is your muse…then dive in buddy"

- Surferguy
Puppet Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 01:38 PM   #1183
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PegCityFlamesFan View Post
Thanks for the updates Troutman, you should be the only one posting in here as it has turned into a pissing match.
This thread is quite civil compared to #Coyotes on Twitter.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 01:45 PM   #1184
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Arizona Free Enterprise Club considers ballot to block Coyotes' deal
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/n...s.html?ana=twt

A conservative group opposed to Glendale’s $300 million arena management deal with Phoenix Coyotes’ suitor Greg Jamison is considering trying to take the issue to voters or could try to recall the four Glendale City Council members who approved the controversial agreement earlier this month.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 01:54 PM   #1185
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

Good god I hate AZ politics
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 01:56 PM   #1186
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Can you not separate being a fan from the idea that a city with a small tax base pouring money into a professional sports team that not many really care about is kind of ridiculous?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 01:59 PM   #1187
landshark
Powerplay Quarterback
 
landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Exp:
Default

Why is that GWI lawyer dissing 'liberals' in those email exchanges? They don't come much more left-winged than me, but I am 100% against public finance of billionaire's businesses.

This whole business looks to me like a cornered mouse with several cats salivating as they slowly close in...

And time of my semi-annual thanking Troutman - Thanks Troutman...
landshark is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to landshark For This Useful Post:
Sol
Old 06-15-2012, 02:00 PM   #1188
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Can you not separate being a fan from the idea that a city with a small tax base pouring money into a professional sports team that not many really care about is kind of ridiculous?
It is ridiculous.. but it's the best option for the city. If Glendale had a time machine, they should've probably never built that arena. But there it is.
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 02:06 PM   #1189
landshark
Powerplay Quarterback
 
landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouw N Arrow View Post
It is ridiculous.. but it's the best option for the city. If Glendale had a time machine, they should've probably never built that arena. But there it is.
In retrospect it was unbelievably stupid, but Glendale wasn't the only entity that assumed that the go-go 90's would go on forever.

But BnA... what would the Coyotes have done without the new arena? I went to a few games at the AA and it was an embarrassment...
landshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 02:07 PM   #1190
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouw N Arrow View Post
Good god I hate AZ politics
I see there is a movement to recall Gov Brewer too.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 02:09 PM   #1191
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
If that were the case it would be ok but it isn't, they are trying to put it on the Glendale public to pay for it by raising taxes which is wrong and why this deal will eventually get crushed in the courts.
The Glendale public is paying for it no matter what. The only real question is whether the people end up paying less to operate an empty arena with no tenant or to pay someone to operate an NHL team there. I'm not going to argue which is the better option, except to think that if Goldwater's challenge works, the city will have to demonstrate the answer.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-15-2012, 02:21 PM   #1192
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Where's the advantage to operating the hockey team when that's the option that costs more money?

Honestly, in all curiousity, what is the difference in costs between leaving that arena empty and the money they're putting into it now? I'd be curious to know how many local jobs would be lost and then determine a cost of each job.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 02:47 PM   #1193
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by landshark View Post
But BnA... what would the Coyotes have done without the new arena? I went to a few games at the AA and it was an embarrassment...
They were essentially Portland bound at that point in time. Scottsdale didn't build at Los Arcos, so Gretz, et all went looking to Glendale who really were desperate to build Glendale Arena (Now Jobing.com) so Glendale really saved the team at that time.
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 03:18 PM   #1194
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
Where's the advantage to operating the hockey team when that's the option that costs more money?

Honestly, in all curiousity, what is the difference in costs between leaving that arena empty and the money they're putting into it now? I'd be curious to know how many local jobs would be lost and then determine a cost of each job.
According to the lease deal that was posted in this thread, the City of Glendale estimates that it will cost them in excess of $500 million over the next 20 years without a primary tenant in the arena. This deal will only cost about $350 million over 20 years.

The big question seems to be where the City got that half-billion figure from; is it accurate; and does it take into account the possibility of an AHL or other non-NHL franchise from occupying the building instead.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 03:20 PM   #1195
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

What are your thoughts of Jamison purchasing the arena in 5 years? If that happens, the arena management fee won't exist.

Spare me the "If he can't get his investors to get money to buy the team, how can he buy the arena?"
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 03:31 PM   #1196
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
The big question seems to be where the City got that half-billion figure from; is it accurate; and does it take into account the possibility of an AHL or other non-NHL franchise from occupying the building instead.
No (from what I can tell, they really don't account for alternative tenants).
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2012, 03:43 PM   #1197
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
No (from what I can tell, they really don't account for alternative tenants).
Which oddly enough is apparently the norm with these studies as the other buildings they refer to use the same thinking. Seems like a pretty large hole.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2012, 06:54 AM   #1198
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
No (from what I can tell, they really don't account for alternative tenants).

Quite true....but then the other point that has to be made is that no other tenant will come even close to paying as much as an NHL club would...unless they get the Suns to move in or something like that.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2012, 09:24 AM   #1199
JBR
Franchise Player
 
JBR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 161 St. - Yankee Stadium
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouw N Arrow View Post
Spare me the "If he can't get his investors to get money to buy the team, how can he buy the arena?"
That is actually a valid question. Why would it be "spared"?
JBR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2012, 09:28 AM   #1200
OzSome
Franchise Player
 
OzSome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

And the Phoenix Coyote soap opera continues.. Let me guess in a month or so, Jamison will back out of this deal and NHL will be stuck operating that franchise again.
OzSome is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy