Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-08-2012, 09:24 AM   #961
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Goldwater Institute looks to halt Glendale vote on Coyotes
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=397908

Quote:
The Goldwater Institute said Thursday that its request will be filed at 8:30 a.m. Friday in Maricopa County Superior Court. The institute bases its request on its contention that the city violated the Arizona open meetings law by failing to make public all documents related to the lease.
The seven-member council is scheduled to convene at 10:15 a.m. Friday to vote on a lease that would pay prospective owner Craig Jamison $17 million a year for arena operation costs and other items. The NHL has owned the team for three seasons after buying it in U.S. Bankruptcy Court.
Goldwater officials said they question the timing of the council's vote.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:25 AM   #962
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Seattle is watching closely too:

Coyotes sale possibly in trouble on multiple fronts
http://www.king5.com/sports/Coyotes-...157985265.html
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:29 AM   #963
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I don't understand how the Goldwater Institute has any sort of power in these proceedings? I didn't look into it too much, but the website seems to suggest its just some sort of lobby group. But how are they legally allowed to request a halt of a vote in City Council? Couldn't the city just tell them to shove it?
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:29 AM   #964
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Why? If that city has a great fanbase that shows constant support for a sports team how do they not deserve to have it?
There's no such thing as "deserving" to have a pro sports team in your city. The only cities that "deserve" teams are the cities in which someone has decided it's worth their time and money to own one.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:35 AM   #965
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

If cops can't do it, surely hockey owners can't either


http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blo...Roberts/163837

A judge this week ruled that the city of Phoenix can’t pay police officers to conduct union work.

That, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Katherine Cooper ruled, is a violation of the state Constitution. Specifically, of the part of the constitution that says you can’t make a gift of public money for private concerns.


Same Judge this morning I believe.

Lisa Halverstadt ‏@LisaHalverstadtRT @smunshi
At Superior Court waiting for hearing to begin on #Goldwater's request to stop #Glendale from voting on #Coyotes deal.

Last edited by troutman; 06-08-2012 at 09:37 AM.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:36 AM   #966
Notorious Honey Badger
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
There's no such thing as "deserving" to have a pro sports team in your city. The only cities that "deserve" teams are the cities in which someone has decided it's worth their time and money to own one.
From a purely business sense, this is correct. But when people here use the word deserve they aren't being black and red in their statement.

Green Bay absolutely "deserves" an NFL franchise. Fan support, loyalty, these are all vital aspects of where franchises "should" be.
Notorious Honey Badger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Notorious Honey Badger For This Useful Post:
Old 06-08-2012, 09:36 AM   #967
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
There's no such thing as "deserving" to have a pro sports team in your city. The only cities that "deserve" teams are the cities in which someone has decided it's worth their time and money to own one.
There is such a thing as good markets and bad markets.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:37 AM   #968
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

It's gonna be a crazy day!
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jordan! For This Useful Post:
Old 06-08-2012, 09:38 AM   #969
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
I don't understand how the Goldwater Institute has any sort of power in these proceedings? I didn't look into it too much, but the website seems to suggest its just some sort of lobby group. But how are they legally allowed to request a halt of a vote in City Council? Couldn't the city just tell them to shove it?
Like any other citizen they are entitled to bring suit
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:40 AM   #970
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Notorious Honey Badger View Post
From a purely business sense, this is correct. But when people here use the word deserve they aren't being black and red in their statement.

Green Bay absolutely "deserves" an NFL franchise. Fan support, loyalty, these are all vital aspects of where franchises "should" be.
I agree, the point is that this is about a business, not a community outreach program. Businesses don't go to cities that "deserve" them, they go to cities that owners determine are worth owning them in.

Calgary doesn't "deserve" the Flames. Calgary is just fortunate that there is a group of people who recognize that the market is a viable place to own a hockey team. If someone thinks the same thing about Phoenix they "deserve" the team to the same degree.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:40 AM   #971
Coach
Franchise Player
 
Coach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
Like any other citizen they are entitled to bring suit
Do they have any sort of case? I mean obviously I know the finicial issues they are facing, but I'm not well-versed in the legal proceedings when it comes to this stuff.
__________________
Coach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:41 AM   #972
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouw N Arrow View Post
It's gonna be a crazy day!
For sure - I think GWI might get an injunction, but they may only delay a vote for a few days?
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:42 AM   #973
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pylon View Post
There are many cities that would embrace, and support this franchise. Winnipeg, deserved a team, Quebec City deserves a team, Hamilton Deserves a team. Having an NHL franchise is the ultimate priveledge as a hockey fan, and regardless of the crappy product the last few years, I am still incredibly grateful, I can say my home town, is in the most elite club of hockey fandom. We are an NHL city. We probably care more here about the Roughnecks, than the citizens of Phoenix care about the Coyotes.

The Phoenix coyotes are a slap in the face to NHL fans. That a city that can't even put what some TOWNS put in an arena for WHL games, at higher prices, cheapens the NHL, and is an insult to the game.

I have said it before, you could put the Coyotes in the Red Deer Centrium, and generate more revenue, have a full building every single night, and probably find a way with creative pricing to have a break even team if they were a cap floor setup. The fact this has been allowed to go on so long, is the biggest joke ever in the NHL.

Phoenix is a great sports town, unfortunately hockey just isn't considered a sport to them. Give the team to a city that cares. And it doesn't have to be Canadian in my eyes. I still think Vegas, would be the ultimate stop for them. No pro sports teams, thousands of Canadian tourists to draw off... heck, I would make the Las Vegas Bandits my second team in a heartbeat.


That's such garbage. I've asked this repeatedly of people never get an answer.

How does the presence of an NHL team in Phoenix negatively impact you personally?
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:42 AM   #974
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
Do they have any sort of case? I mean obviously I know the finicial issues they are facing, but I'm not well-versed in the legal proceedings when it comes to this stuff.
GWI:

Arizona’s Open Meetings Law and multiple court orders require the city to make public all documents related to the proposed contract at least 24 hours before a Council vote is taken, which it has not done.

Seems clear enough - the vote may only get delayed for a few days.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:42 AM   #975
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Ya i find it hard to believe that the GWI can legally halt the vote....i get they can challenge the results of the vote and whatnot, but not even allowing the city to go about doing their jobs? Bizarre.

Ahhh...just saw trouts post, explains that part of things.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:43 AM   #976
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post


That's such garbage. I've asked this repeatedly of people never get an answer.

How does the presence of an NHL team in Phoenix negatively impact you personally?
Simple. I would personally be happier to see a strong franchise in Quebec, than a weak franchise in Phoenix.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:44 AM   #977
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC View Post
Do they have any sort of case? I mean obviously I know the finicial issues they are facing, but I'm not well-versed in the legal proceedings when it comes to this stuff.
I have no idea if their claim is valid, but this isn't a move to block the sale or the lease, it's a move to delay the vote in order to comply with an open meeting law. I'm actually on board with GWI on this, if the city isn't letting people see the documents they shouldn't be able to vote on the lease.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:45 AM   #978
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
Simple. I would personally be happier to see a strong franchise in Quebec, than a weak franchise in Phoenix.
So just being "happier" is a personal impact now? C'mon.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:46 AM   #979
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
So just being "happier" is a personal impact now? C'mon.
You are judge and jury on what is important for everyone?
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2012, 09:46 AM   #980
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I think its terrible that people tend to be actively cheering for the Coyotes to leave Phoenix. I don't really care one way or another what happens but for people to actually be rooting for the franchise to leave is just weird to me. If the shoe was on the other foot I doubt people would have this mindset.

Phoenix just went through an economic class that is hurting all their sports teams and it's a big reason for the struggles (combined with their first real success being this season).

How soon we forget how the Flames/Oilers were close to having to move when the Canadian economy was in the tank and the teams were consistantly losing.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy