Day 17 Results

[Slava]

I think we should only sim the CPHL. I like having the AHL, and I felt the same as Hanni when I was out last year, but I also think that most GMs don't care about the results there, so it might save you a bit of time and not take much away from the league.

[Swayze11]

I would be in favor of only simming CPHL

[Knut]

Scrap the AHL simming. But will this effect how Caged Greats CPHL does ?

[Superfraggle]

I would say scrap it as well. I personally like having it, but it's the sort of thing that's only worth doing if everyone is on board with it, which is clearly not the case.

[I wanna be like Miikka]

I vote to scrap the AHL simming. And to fire MJK.

[Hanni]

Either expect it to be done, or scrap it, either way works for me.

[TurdFerguson]

Can we start to Sim the ECHL ? I feel I'd be much more competitive there.

Agree with everyone else though, require lines or scrap it. No point having only a portion of the league putting effort in.

[dsavillian]

No insult to me if we don't sim the AHL.

What does that mean for AHL cap and 2-way contracts though?

[JiriHrdina]

Originally Posted by dsavillian

No insult to me if we don't sim the AHL.

What does that mean for AHL cap and 2-way contracts though?

Those limits would still be strictly enforced.

[Cheese]

scrap the simming of AHL games...

[Young Guns]

I prefer to get rid of the AHL simming as well.

[mbeauchamp76]

I think by not simming AHL games there will be alot of journey AHL players being released. Thus there would be even more teams searching for overlooked young players that still may develop into something rather than keeping NHL/CPHL "has beens" or busts playing in the AHL just because they have a half decent AHL rating but not good enough for the CPHL.

My vote is not to SIM. Gets rid of a big headache. I mean I did care especially when I won the Calder last year but there was no recognition what so ever, so what is the point then.