Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-05-2012, 02:51 PM   #901
Rhettzky
Franchise Player
 
Rhettzky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Section 222
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
In searching I cannot find an example of a trade where the backup had a much worse record than the starter. Remember that Toskala was a starter for a few years and our record ws catastrophic. Your logic is reaching if you assume we could get something close to Kipper. Anyway you look at it our record would be worse. Seven less wins is realistic and that would put us with somethingspecial up north
I don't think you understand what textcritic was saying. You wouldn't replace your starting goalie with a back-up. Any team in the league that would replace their starter for a back-up would be considerably worse.
__________________
Go Flames Go!!
Rhettzky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 02:55 PM   #902
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

The Flames are not that bad of a team without Kipper. I don't think they would be in the playoff hunt like they are now, but they would not be a lottery team either. There would have been another goalie found to be steady in net. The Flames are not a lottery team any way you slice it - not with Iginla, Tanguay, Jokinen, Bouwmeester, Giordano and a bunch of steady veterans. Sure, we are not a contender, but the way people talk about the Flames without Kipper is pretty much as valid as saying we are contenders.
Calgary4LIfe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 02:56 PM   #903
VladtheImpaler
Franchise Player
 
VladtheImpaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I was reading the Post over the weekend and they had a piece on the point-value (or something - I wish I could remember exactly the name and the source) of players to their team. Basically, someone analyzed what a particular player is worth to his team in terms of points in the standings. Malkin was the top skater with somewhere around 12 I believe (no Flame made the top 20 or whatever they had in the paper) and Kipper was #5 among goalies with 10.9 (I believe Rinne, Lundqvist, Mike Smith and........... Fleury?... were ahead of him). So, basically we would have 11 less points if we had an "average" goalie.
BTW, Bobby Orr holds the all-time recond with 20-something. Gretzky had around 19.
I am terribly sorry, but I was on holiday in Ivermere, so I cannot recall the website where all this can be found...
__________________
Cordially as always,
Vlad the Impaler

Please check out http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...94#post3726494

VladtheImpaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 02:57 PM   #904
kehatch
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Thought I clicked on the wrong link for a second. Isn't this the holy crap look at Baertschi thread???
kehatch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kehatch For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2012, 02:59 PM   #905
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe View Post
The Flames are not that bad of a team without Kipper. I don't think they would be in the playoff hunt like they are now, but they would not be a lottery team either. There would have been another goalie found to be steady in net. The Flames are not a lottery team any way you slice it - not with Iginla, Tanguay, Jokinen, Bouwmeester, Giordano and a bunch of steady veterans. Sure, we are not a contender, but the way people talk about the Flames without Kipper is pretty much as valid as saying we are contenders.
You realize just 5 less points and we are a lottery team? That is just 2.5 wins less than we have now. I'd say that is quite different than the 8-10 more wins we'd need to be a contender...

Edit: Actually looking at it, if we lose to Montreal and Edmonton loses to San Jose, we are just as far from the playoffs as we are from the lottery...

Last edited by Street Pharmacist; 03-05-2012 at 03:02 PM.
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 03:07 PM   #906
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhettzky View Post
I don't think you understand what textcritic was saying. You wouldn't replace your starting goalie with a back-up. Any team in the league that would replace their starter for a back-up would be considerably worse.
I was just pointing out that no team that traded their starter recently relied on them so heavily for wins, so those comparisons were not really valid
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 03:22 PM   #907
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Wargh!!! Don't dilute the lovefest that is the Sven Fricken Bartschi thread!

This is our only escape! Have hope!
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2012, 03:28 PM   #908
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Wargh!!! Don't dilute the lovefest that is the Sven Fricken Bartschi thread!

This is our only escape! Have hope!
Sorry, got carried away...
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 03:36 PM   #909
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

More reports of swiss goodness please. Less debating about goaltenders.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2012, 04:00 PM   #910
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
I...Your logic is reaching if you assume we could get something close to Kipper. Anyway you look at it our record would be worse. Seven less wins is realistic and that would put us with somethingspecial up north
I never suggested that our record would not be worse. My contention is that it is likely not to be so bad as to result in a -14 point loss on the season. I expect something closer to 10.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 04:20 PM   #911
VladtheImpaler
Franchise Player
 
VladtheImpaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
I never suggested that our record would not be worse. My contention is that it is likely not to be so bad as to result in a -14 point loss on the season. I expect something closer to 10.
See above.
__________________
Cordially as always,
Vlad the Impaler

Please check out http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...94#post3726494

VladtheImpaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 04:43 PM   #912
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

^
My apologies for the derailment of this fine thread, but I feel the point requires reinforcement, and then I am done with it. That point being: the Flames are not a 30th place team without Kiprusoff alone. My response is to the rather emphatic and poorly supported declarations such as:


Quote:
Originally Posted by kermitology View Post
...We'd be lower than the Oilers if not for Kiprusoff...
Simply not true. The Flames would be worse off, yes, and this would reflect in a lower placement in the standings, but even a 10-point fall from their current position is NOT lower than the Oilers.

I'm done. And now, back to Baertschi.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 04:59 PM   #913
Muta
Franchise Player
 
Muta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Exp:
Default

If Bartschi has holes in his game, does that make him Swiss BartCheese?

....


Muta is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Muta For This Useful Post:
Old 03-05-2012, 05:15 PM   #914
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
If Bartschi has holes in his game, does that make him Swiss BartCheese?

....


You are one clever mofo.
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2012, 06:35 PM   #915
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

40 goals and 70 assist is looking doable. Six games left against the bottom teams.

Sitting at 33 and 61.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 10:51 PM   #916
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

Baertschi looked good in his debut. He suprised me with his open ice speed, really fast and the way he chose to take the puck to the net around the D was impressive I have no doubt that the more he plays at this level he would soon be getting a full step on them.

Sven taking the body on boards was another thing I did not expect to see from him, the crowd was jacked everytime he touched the puck.
__________________
Stay Golden is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Stay Golden For This Useful Post:
Old 03-09-2012, 10:53 PM   #917
jar_e
Franchise Player
 
jar_e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Other than an incredibly dumb penalty in a two goal game, he definitely showed some brilliance out there. Good break outs.
jar_e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 10:56 PM   #918
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Pretty decent debut, especially for a young kid in his first game in such a situation.

Love seeing his speed and physical play.....two assets that will be huge for him and the team down the road.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 10:58 PM   #919
Brotato
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jar_e View Post
Other than an incredibly dumb penalty in a two goal game, he definitely showed some brilliance out there. Good break outs.
I believe you mean BS penalty. That was just the refs showing a rookie that you respect the vets, that's all. Don't like it, but understand why they called it. Emotions got the best of him and he gave a vet some wood. 2 minutes and some humble pie will help him.
Brotato is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brotato For This Useful Post:
Old 03-09-2012, 11:01 PM   #920
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jar_e View Post
Other than an incredibly dumb penalty in a two goal game, he definitely showed some brilliance out there. Good break outs.
that call was so weak.
__________________
Stay Golden is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Stay Golden For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:10 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy