Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-05-2012, 04:16 PM   #21
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

The Seattle Call Us When You've Actually Built an Arenas
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 04:28 PM   #22
doctajones428
First Line Centre
 
doctajones428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fort St. John, BC
Exp:
Default

Seattle Nordiques!
doctajones428 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 04:35 PM   #23
Red Slinger
First Line Centre
 
Red Slinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Despite the large population, advantageous geographic location and the proposed new arena I just don't see the NHL being successful in Seattle. It has never been a particularly strong hockey market. In fact, it's not a very strong sports market, in general, with the exception of the Seahawks. But the NFL is much more than sport in the US.

Don't see it happening. I think Kansas City, Oklahoma City and even Houston are more likely NHL destinations.
__________________
The of and to a in is I that it for you was with on as have but be they
Red Slinger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Red Slinger For This Useful Post:
Old 02-05-2012, 04:39 PM   #24
Joborule
Franchise Player
 
Joborule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Slinger View Post
Despite the large population, advantageous geographic location and the proposed new arena I just don't see the NHL being successful in Seattle. It has never been a particularly strong hockey market. In fact, it's not a very strong sports market, in general, with the exception of the Seahawks. But the NFL is much more than sport in the US.
Is that really the case? NBA left because they didn't get a new arena. I think the fan support was/is there. MLB is doing well enough it appears, and they haven't made the playoffs since 2001.
Joborule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 04:44 PM   #25
Red Slinger
First Line Centre
 
Red Slinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joborule View Post
Is that really the case? NBA left because they didn't get a new arena. I think the fan support was/is there. MLB is doing well enough it appears, and they haven't made the playoffs since 2001.
That's true.

Seattle has been rumoured to be a NHL destination ever since Vancouver, Calgary and Edmonton came into the league. There simply hasn't been the grass-roots, ground-level support for a NHL team in Seattle. Despite a new arena and possibly some money behind a team, without some real local interest for a team in Seattle it will likely turn out no better than the Phoenix, Atlanta, Florida, etc. expansion.
__________________
The of and to a in is I that it for you was with on as have but be they
Red Slinger is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Red Slinger For This Useful Post:
Old 02-05-2012, 04:47 PM   #26
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Would rather see the Nordique return.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 05:22 PM   #27
Joborule
Franchise Player
 
Joborule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Slinger View Post
That's true.

Seattle has been rumoured to be a NHL destination ever since Vancouver, Calgary and Edmonton came into the league. There simply hasn't been the grass-roots, ground-level support for a NHL team in Seattle. Despite a new arena and possibly some money behind a team, without some real local interest for a team in Seattle it will likely turn out no better than the Phoenix, Atlanta, Florida, etc. expansion.
True that there hasn't been much basis in previous groundwork, but I think with it's proximity to Canada/Vancouver and the NW region of US having no NHL teams at all (Denver and San Jose being the closest), I think it would have a fair shot of being successful. (As long management puts out a decent team in due time)
Joborule is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Joborule For This Useful Post:
Old 02-05-2012, 07:54 PM   #28
Blaster86
UnModerator
 
Blaster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Would rather see the Nordique return.
Seattle Nordiques?
__________________

THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver
Blaster86 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 08:11 PM   #29
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Seattle Microsofts

Oilers relocate
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Canada 02 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-05-2012, 08:16 PM   #30
pylon
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Exp:
Default

Seattle Cobains.

They'll blow your mind.
pylon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pylon For This Useful Post:
Old 02-05-2012, 08:16 PM   #31
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Seattle Battalion.

I spent a number of years down there and hockey was always looked upon as a novelty. I've always seen Seattle and even Portland as poor NHL cities.
SportsJunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 08:32 PM   #32
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Seattle Superdawgs.
__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 09:58 PM   #33
Vulcan
Franchise Player
 
Vulcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
Exp:
Default

Seattle was once given a provisional NHL franchise. I guess they couldn't get all their provisions together though Seattle has a long hockey history stretching back 100 years. I think it would be great for them to get a NHL team.

Name them the Totems like their old WHL team. They can also play temporarily in the Tacoma Dome. It all hinges on getting a new arena though.
Vulcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 10:01 PM   #34
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

the Seattle moving in 3-5 years
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 10:13 PM   #35
Winsor_Pilates
Franchise Player
 
Winsor_Pilates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Van City - Main St.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Slinger View Post
Despite the large population, advantageous geographic location and the proposed new arena I just don't see the NHL being successful in Seattle. It has never been a particularly strong hockey market. In fact, it's not a very strong sports market, in general, with the exception of the Seahawks. But the NFL is much more than sport in the US.

Don't see it happening. I think Kansas City, Oklahoma City and even Houston are more likely NHL destinations.
Even the sounders get amazingly large crowds.
Not sure where the notion Seattle isn't a strong sports market comes from.
Winsor_Pilates is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Winsor_Pilates For This Useful Post:
Old 02-05-2012, 10:21 PM   #36
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates View Post
Even the sounders get amazingly large crowds.
Not sure where the notion Seattle isn't a strong sports market comes from.
Yeah it's actually one of the better US sports markets. They actually support their teams win or lose. I think it's a great location and would make road swing for eastern teams to Vancouver much easier as they could spend 2-3 days between Seattle and Vancouver much like teams going through California rather than take a long flight in then out right after. Also another fan base to strongly loathe the Canucks.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2012, 10:21 PM   #37
Azure
Had an idea!
 
Azure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates View Post
Even the sounders get amazingly large crowds.
Not sure where the notion Seattle isn't a strong sports market comes from.
Or a strong hockey market. Like has been mentioned earlier in the thread, Seattle has a great interest in minor league hockey, which is basically your grassroots effort that you need.

I lived there 15 years ago, and there wasn't much interest in hockey, but I would say that has changed a lot. The interest in the Winterhawks, Thunderbirds, Chiefs and Tri-City Americans has greatly increased, and even at a local level I would say that a lot of the kids I knew that wanted nothing to do with hockey are now all involved with some sort of league or recreational hockey.

Also, I would say that a team in Seattle would do much better than a team in Florida. The NHL is growing, and I think a team in Seattle would do well.
Azure is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Azure For This Useful Post:
Old 02-05-2012, 11:36 PM   #38
604flames
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Watching a Thunderbirds game at KeyArena was a pretty unique hockey experience...
604flames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2012, 12:02 AM   #39
Trailer Fire
First Line Centre
 
Trailer Fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Armpit of BC: Trail
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 604flames View Post
Watching a Thunderbirds game at KeyArena was a pretty unique hockey experience...
Off topic, but awesome avatar.
Trailer Fire is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Trailer Fire For This Useful Post:
Old 02-06-2012, 03:29 AM   #40
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Seattle won't pay for an arena for anything so unless Richie Rich is going to fork out for the arena it ain't happening regardless of what kind of a market it might be.
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:35 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy