10-30-2011, 10:03 AM
|
#21
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Edmonton, AB
|
Not too highly honestly. I dated my wife for 8 years long distance before we got married. She is a teacher and we make over $300 000/year(Not bragging I have a business) and now I feel I am ready to have a kid. I wanted to make sure I was stable.
I just turned 29 and my wife just turned 30 as well.
I'm also East Indian I don't know if that factors into it.
Last edited by Champion; 10-30-2011 at 10:08 AM.
|
|
|
10-30-2011, 10:06 AM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
|
My niece (14) recently disowned her mom, who was simply using her for child care for her 4 (or 5? Who knows, I lost count, but they keep popping out) youngest kids (6 and under), so she could play WOW all day. The funniest thing is when maintenance enforcement went after the mom for child support, so now not only does she lose her free babysitter and her child support from her ex, but now she needs to pay that same child support to my sibling.
Amazing how her tune changes about paying for things that are not part of the regular monthly payments, like for recreation etc. Before they were essential and now it is her opinion that her ex is 'just milking the system vindictively'.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
|
|
|
10-30-2011, 10:16 AM
|
#23
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Behind Nikkor Glass
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Champion
She is a teacher and we make over $300 000/year(Not bragging I have a business)
I'm also East Indian I don't know if that factors into it.
|
300,000 in Rupees?
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Regulator75 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-30-2011, 10:27 AM
|
#24
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
|
What does dropping your yearly income have to do with the original question?
Is this the new equivalent of the "MY GIRLFRIEND" posts on the internet?
|
|
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
|
4X4,
Boblobla,
Buzzard,
cKy,
FLAMESRULE,
Flashpoint,
jar_e,
jayswin,
Pizza,
puckluck,
Slava,
Thor,
yads
|
10-30-2011, 10:30 AM
|
#25
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime
What does dropping your yearly income have to do with the original question?
|
Wrong thread perhaps? He IS the 1%
|
|
|
10-30-2011, 10:36 AM
|
#26
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Edmonton, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regulator75
300,000 in Rupees?
|
That was pretty funny lol
CDN dollars
I don't know. Since I was 18 I had a chance to bang a lot of chicks, but why would I want a kid with them? Hell no.
|
|
|
10-30-2011, 10:57 AM
|
#27
|
Norm!
|
I don't know if its a dealbreaker, some people just make bad judgements, maybe are a bit misguided, or guilable.
on the plus side, it means I have a chance
on the negative side her ladybits probably look like they were hit by a speeding kenworth.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
10-30-2011, 11:04 AM
|
#28
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
I have no idea, I was wondering about that as I was cleaning my eight and a half inch penis.
|
Still confused as to which side is the centimeter and which is the inches side of a ruler I see.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Barnes For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-30-2011, 11:42 AM
|
#29
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lethbridge
|
It's just the continued break down of the family unit in the west, thanks in part to an overall decline of morality, awful marriage/divorce laws and marxist-feminism...
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mikey_the_redneck For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-30-2011, 11:48 AM
|
#30
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
|
What the hell does Marxist Feminism have to do with women having excessive numbers of children?
Does their claim that the capitalism system, which validates men and their work activities while at the same time trivializes women's work in the home, somehow serve to encourage them to have more kids and be further indentured to a life of taking care of children in the home?
Please enlighten me, because this I need to hear.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Rathji For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-30-2011, 11:52 AM
|
#31
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck
It's just the continued break down of the family unit in the west, thanks in part to an overall decline of morality, awful marriage/divorce laws and marxist-feminism...
|
And the NWO, shadowy, lizard people. Don't forget them.
|
|
|
10-30-2011, 12:03 PM
|
#32
|
Franchise Player
|
I once dated a girl and her sister had 3 kids with 3 different fathers. I personally thought that it was kind of reckless/irresponisible on her part since it caused so many problems for everyone involved.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Huntingwhale For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-30-2011, 12:14 PM
|
#33
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lethbridge
|
With how the marriage/divorce laws are structured, it almost gives women an incentive to divorce and move on to the next husband when they get sick of their current husband. Women nowadays initiate divorce proceedings the vast majority of the time (I think something like 70%). They know they will get some support from the government in financial aid or tax breaks, and the child support/alimony to make the transition as smooth as possible(so to speak).
If the aim of marxist feminism is to make men and women equal in every way (socially, economically etc.), it will naturally undermine the concept of a patirarchal family unit.
|
|
|
10-30-2011, 12:22 PM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck
With how the marriage/divorce laws are structured, it almost gives women an incentive to divorce and move on to the next husband when they get sick of their current husband. Women nowadays initiate divorce proceedings the vast majority of the time (I think something like 70%). They know they will get some support from the government in financial aid or tax breaks, and the child support/alimony to make the transition as smooth as possible(so to speak).
If the aim of marxist feminism is to make men and women equal in every way (socially, economically etc.), it will naturally undermine the concept of a patirarchal family unit.
|
Actually, it is more often considered a tenet of Liberal Feminism that men and women be equal in every way. Marxist Feminists tend to worry about the economic inequality.
Quotes from Wikipedia, because I am not about to go searching for a real source that qill say the same thing.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_feminism
Quote:
It is an individualistic form of feminism and theory, which focuses on women’s ability to show and maintain their equality through their own actions and choices. Liberal feminism looks at the personal interactions of men and women as the starting ground from which to transform society into a more gender-equitable place.
Issues important to liberal feminists include reproductive rights and abortion access, sexual harassment, voting, education, fair compensation for work, affordable childcare, affordable health care, and bringing to light the frequency of sexual and domestic violence against women
|
Marxist feminism is typically more concerned with just the economic problems as the root cause.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxist_feminism
Quote:
Marxist feminism states that private property, which gives rise to economic inequality, dependence, political confusion, and ultimately unhealthy social relations between men and women, is the root of women's oppression in the current social context.
|
I wont even touch on the fact that you think the patriarchal family unit is the only good way for a family to be, and as such, all other forms are inferior and cause problems...
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
|
|
|
10-30-2011, 12:35 PM
|
#35
|
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pylon
And the NWO, shadowy, lizard people. Don't forget them.
|
Exactly. And don't forget zombie nazis.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Cecil Terwilliger For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-30-2011, 12:38 PM
|
#36
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck
With how the marriage/divorce laws are structured, it almost gives women an incentive to divorce and move on to the next husband when they get sick of their current husband. Women nowadays initiate divorce proceedings the vast majority of the time (I think something like 70%). They know they will get some support from the government in financial aid or tax breaks, and the child support/alimony to make the transition as smooth as possible(so to speak).
If the aim of marxist feminism is to make men and women equal in every way (socially, economically etc.), it will naturally undermine the concept of a patirarchal family unit.
|
1. You are clueless. There is no "incentive" to get divorced. Sure it is a lot easier than it used to be, but it's not like there is a massive economic windfall from getting divorced.
2. Is this a bad thing?
__________________
|
|
|
10-30-2011, 01:08 PM
|
#37
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
|
28 with 5 kids from different fathers? That's no girl...
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.
|
|
|
10-30-2011, 01:10 PM
|
#38
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
I was talking girth.
|
Hey, how's it going there Mr. Soup Can Penis? Do you wear a sling for it or does it ride on a wheeled apparatus?
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Reaper For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-30-2011, 01:11 PM
|
#39
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Back on topic, my opinion is she didn't pay attention during sex ed class.
If she really wanted to not get pregnant, she just needs to go on top. Everyone knows you can't get pregnant if the girl is on top.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to IliketoPuck For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-30-2011, 01:13 PM
|
#40
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck
With how the marriage/divorce laws are structured, it almost gives women an incentive to divorce and move on to the next husband when they get sick of their current husband. Women nowadays initiate divorce proceedings the vast majority of the time (I think something like 70%). They know they will get some support from the government in financial aid or tax breaks, and the child support/alimony to make the transition as smooth as possible(so to speak).
If the aim of marxist feminism is to make men and women equal in every way (socially, economically etc.), it will naturally undermine the concept of a patirarchal family unit.
|
My mother is 80 and she has stayed with my dad in spite of the times he would beat her and us. The endless abuse and drinking was pure hell for a child to grow up in.
I wish she would have left him, but she was afraid to and we had no place to go.
Back then if society would be more like today and not like you wish it was my mother may have had a chance or at least an option.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to SeeBass For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:20 PM.
|
|