Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-17-2011, 08:18 PM   #21
frinkprof
First Line Centre
 
frinkprof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Handsome B. Wonderful View Post
That's not high speed rail for Canada, that's high speed rail for one specific section of Canada.
Quote:
Originally Posted by drewboy12 View Post
Canada is way to large with to small of a population to ever have a high speed rail system connecting the entire country.
Yeah. Although the title is a bit misleading in that regard, High Speed Rail has only ever made sense in 2 corridors in Canada: Quebec City to Windsor (or a portion thereof) and the Edmonton - Calgary corridor. If the lower mainland had more of the characteristics of a corridor, you could include that as well - but it doesn't.

Indeed, in North America in general, only disconnected corridors make sense.

Here's a map someone did up showing the various corridors in the USA that have had High Speed Rail proposed at some point - or would otherwise make sense. It includes a couple that go up into Canada.

Spoiler!


There's been a series of these Quebec City-Windsor corridor High Speed Rail studies over the years. If I recall correctly they have mostly resulted in the corridor being deemed as conditionally viable.

It's only really a matter of time passing and a number of factors converging (critical population mass, technology vs. cost, cost of alternatives, etc.) before the Quebec-Windsor corridor is attractive for high speed rail.

What I think will happen is that the most central and populous segment, Toronto - Montreal, is built and then added onto over time. Toronto - Hamilton, Montreal - Quebec City, Hamilton - London, London - Windsor.

As for Calgary - Edmonton, Bigtime is correct on all points. Land for stations in both downtown Calgary and downtown Edmonton has been purchased by the Province of Alberta, as has some parts of the future right of way between the two cities.

Both of these corridors are long-term propositions though - something on the scale of decades. In the meantime, resources are much better spent on improving intra-city rail transit networks in the cities.

----------------------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15 View Post
We can't even figure out how to set the C-train up properly and you want a high speed train?
Go on. Not implying you're wrong, but could you elaborate?

Last edited by frinkprof; 10-17-2011 at 08:21 PM.
frinkprof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2011, 08:21 PM   #22
Rathji
Franchise Player
 
Rathji's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
Exp:
Default

^ Thats good, if we have high speed rail to Calgary then homeless people and vagrants from Edmonton will be able to go an infest the area around the West leg of the LRT too.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
Rathji is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2011, 08:25 PM   #23
frinkprof
First Line Centre
 
frinkprof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji View Post
^ Thats good, if we have high speed rail to Calgary then homeless people and vagrants from Edmonton will be able to go an infest the area around the West leg of the LRT too.






frinkprof is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to frinkprof For This Useful Post:
Old 10-17-2011, 08:32 PM   #24
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frinkprof View Post
Here's a map someone did up showing the various corridors in the USA that have had High Speed Rail proposed at some point - or would otherwise make sense. It includes a couple that go up into Canada.

Spoiler!
Sounds like the person stated his/her methodology, so he isn't wrong. There's some weird stuff in it there though. Eugene to Portland? DFW-Little Rock? Ahead of DFW-Houston?
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:11 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy