The Kardashian family 2010 income: 65 million - Page 5 - Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

RedJester · 10-17-2011, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck

That being said I would still bang Kim from one end of my place to the other. I wouldn't marry her though, she's got a sex tape on the web, not classy....

Talks about banging Kim Kardashian on a public forum, wouldn't marry her because she's not classy.

You crack me up, mikey.

Muta · 10-17-2011, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by valo403

I completely understand that, my issue is with your apparent inability to address a legitimate point made in relation to that stance. If you can't muster the intellect to respond with anything other than whoosh it's really not my problem, but don't pretend that people are trying to pick a fight simply because you can't flesh out your position.

What point? That people will spend their money elsewhere instead?

Very likely. I really don't have any qulams with that. However, it's not what I was really arguing.

There, can you stop crying now?

valo403 · 10-17-2011, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Muta

What point? That people will spend their money elsewhere instead?

Very likely. I really don't have any qulams with that. However, it's not what I was really arguing.

There, can you stop crying now?

No

VladtheImpaler · 10-17-2011, 11:20 AM

So, your point is that societal priorities are misguided because people watch the Kardashians instead of Through The Wormhole with Morgan Freeman? Sure, but what do you propose to do about it, other than OWS?

Ozy_Flame · 10-17-2011, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by valo403

Yep, and then when a portion of it was challenged he went with whoosh as his counter point. Please re-read the thread.

Valo . . . This is a message board. Muta has already posted what he thought, where he stands, and debated with you guys a bit. 'Whoosh' is not a drive-by, it's a sarcastic jab that I think you are taking to personally to heart based on past conversations you've had with Muta.

There is no rule on CP that says you have to post in-depth, in-detail, sophisticated thought pieces as responses.

This is just a message board. A simple, free, public internet message board. He can post what he wants. And he's made his point well known.

I can't help but think you have a bitter taste in your mouth that you are just challenging for the sake of challenging, and again, you are equally as guilty for name-calling on numerous occasions.

Grow up.

valo403 · 10-17-2011, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame

Valo . . . This is a message board. Muta has already posted what he thought, where he stands, and debated with you guys a bit. 'Whoosh' is not a drive-by, it's a sarcastic jab that I think you are taking to personally to heart based on past conversations you've had with Muta.

There is no rule on CP that says you have to post in-depth, in-detail, sophisticated thought pieces as responses.

This is just a message board. A simple, free, public internet message board. He can post what he wants. And he's made his point well known.

I can't help but think you have a bitter taste in your mouth that you are just challenging for the sake of challenging, and again, you are equally as guilty for name-calling on numerous occasions.

Grow up.

I wouldn't have an issue if he didn't play the victim card earlier in the thread. If you don't want to go in depth, fine, but don't act like you're a victim because people are challenging your position.

Muta · 10-17-2011, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler

So, your point is that societal priorities are misguided because people watch the Kardashians instead of Through The Wormhole with Morgan Freeman? Sure, but what do you propose to do about it, other than OWS?

Calm down. I've made it very clear already that if one wants to contribute to society and ultimately its well-being, its much more noble to aspire to be a doctor or scientist to do that than it is to make yourself famous for your butt and being famous for, well, nothing really else (except a porn tape, lol).

Muta · 10-17-2011, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by valo403

I wouldn't have an issue if he didn't play the victim card earlier in the thread. If you don't want to go in depth, fine, but don't act like you're a victim because people are challenging your position.

I was a victim? When did that happen?

I've addressed everything in this thread that I can as it relates to me.

Ozy_Flame · 10-17-2011, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by valo403

I wouldn't have an issue if he didn't play the victim card earlier in the thread. If you don't want to go in depth, fine, but don't act like you're a victim because people are challenging your position.

You have an issue with one-liner responses, as demonstrated in previous discussions. This has nothing to do with 'playing the victim' and everything to do with finding a short response to jump on and chastise. I've argued with you enough to know that much.

Two Fivenagame · 10-17-2011, 11:31 AM

Completely ridiculous that anyone would say that the Kardashian's aren't intelligent business people when they have 65 MILLION reasons to say otherwi..... wait there's a porn tape??

valo403 · 10-17-2011, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame

You have an issue with one-liner responses, as demonstrated in previous discussions. This has nothing to do with 'playing the victim' and everything to do with finding a short response to jump on and chastise. I've argued with you enough to know that much.

Do I have an issue with people who raise a point and then resort to condescending responses when they're challenged on it? Yep, sure do.

I also have an issue with people who think that people are arguing with them for arguments sake when they raise legitimate points. If you don't want to get into it fine, but I can do without the playground level whoosh comments.

Ozy_Flame · 10-17-2011, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by valo403

Do I have an issue with people who raise a point and then resort to condescending responses when they're challenged on it? Yep, sure do.

I also have an issue with people who think that people are arguing with them for arguments sake when they raise legitimate points. If you don't want to get into it fine, but I can do without the playground level whoosh comments.

Then put Muta on IGNORE. Or are you available to keep arguing about petty stuff all day?

You life would be so much easier if you just put Muta (and probably myself as well) on Ignore.

valo403 · 10-17-2011, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame

Then put Muta on IGNORE. Or are you available to keep arguing about petty stuff all day?

You life would be so much easier if you just put Muta (and probably myself as well) on Ignore.

You think these exchanges bring trouble to my life? This is entertaining and makes the slow parts of my day go by much faster.

VladtheImpaler · 10-17-2011, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame

Then put Muta on IGNORE. Or are you available to keep arguing about petty stuff all day?

You life would be so much easier if you just put Muta (and probably myself as well) on Ignore.

It would be easier, but much less entertaining. You might say you are the Kardashians of CP... Always wrong, but always ready with a spirited argument.
Look at the froth Muta has worked up, even though nobody is arguing with him, just asking him for clarification...

Ozy_Flame · 10-17-2011, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by valo403

You think these exchanges bring trouble to my life? This is entertaining and makes the slow parts of my day go by much faster.

So you're a glutton for punishment.

You're like the guy who secretly loves to smell other people's farts. Although you're not so secret about it.

EDIT: You too, Vlad.

valo403 · 10-17-2011, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame

So you're a glutton for punishment.

You're like the guy who secretly loves to smell other people's farts. Although you're not so secret about it.

EDIT: You too, Vlad.

Kind of hilarious that this is coming from someone who is always at the heart of these exchanges. Pot, meet kettle.

VladtheImpaler · 10-17-2011, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame

So you're a glutton for punishment.

You're like the guy who secretly loves to smell other people's farts. Although you're not so secret about it.

EDIT: You too, Vlad.

I love farts. I pay a lot of money for farts.

mikey_the_redneck · 10-17-2011, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedJester

Talks about banging Kim Kardashian on a public forum, wouldn't marry her because she's not classy.

You crack me up, mikey.

Oh come on now.....

Expressing an attraction to a celebrity from an anonymous position is far from a publicly "leaked" sex tape on the class scale.

Ozy_Flame · 10-17-2011, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by valo403

Kind of hilarious that this is coming from someone who is always at the heart of these exchanges. Pot, meet kettle.

Says the guy who follows me (and Muta) around to various threads and needs his word in edge-wise.

But keep on truckin'!

Muta · 10-17-2011, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by valo403

Do I have an issue with people who raise a point and then resort to condescending responses when they're challenged on it? Yep, sure do.

I also have an issue with people who think that people are arguing with them for arguments sake when they raise legitimate points. If you don't want to get into it fine, but I can do without the playground level whoosh comments.

That's funny, since 1) that comment wasn't directed at you, and 2) it was very applicable, since it wasn't my point. But despite what you may think, I don't hold it against Vlad for that.

Seriously, did someone put a Slap Chop up your cornhole? It would explain your rage and chronic anger over the littlest things.