10-07-2011, 10:52 AM
|
#1
|
Had an idea!
|
Stunning job growth in Canada during September
Quote:
OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada churned out a stunning 60,900 jobs in September, once again outshining the United States with an economy that is humming along even as other rich nations struggle with debt and slumping confidence.
The jobless rate fell unexpectedly to 7.1 percent from 7.3 percent in August, Statistics Canada reported on Friday, compared with a U.S. rate that has stayed stubbornly above 9 percent. The U.S. unemployment rate was 9.1 percent in September.
Adjusted to take account of the relative sizes of the two economies and slightly different statistical methods, Canada's gain in new jobs would be comparable to half a million new U.S. positions. U.S. employment rose 103,000 in September.
|
http://ca.reuters.com/article/busine...7961MY20111007
Maybe Forbes has a point when they say Canada is the #1 destination in the world for business right now.
And I took lowering taxes and creating a competitive business environment didn't matter.
|
|
|
10-07-2011, 10:57 AM
|
#2
|
Norm!
|
Awwww f%ck!!!
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2011, 11:29 AM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Awesome....I knew that chemgear would find the bad news here for us!
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2011, 11:38 AM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava
Awesome....I knew that chemgear would find the bad news here for us!
|
Heh, actually the Financial Post article was the first one I read this morning. I was thinking it was kinda silly to have what would essentially be a large drop in employment in the summer only to gain it all back in September. I don't think it's bad news - just how the numbers fall.
EDIT: Having a chance to read it through, the original article link from Azure mentions the caveats as well:
One caveat is that 38,400 of the new September jobs were in education, as teachers and assistants returned to work after summer layoffs. Statscan adjusts for seasonal factors - the unadjusted job growth in education was 242,000 in September - but says there has not been enough of a pattern in this sector to eliminate all summer fluctuations.
Besides the education distortions, they pointed to a rise of 38,900 in self-employment, which they described as soft, and among actual employees, private sector jobs fell by 14,900.
Last edited by chemgear; 10-07-2011 at 12:24 PM.
|
|
|
10-07-2011, 07:30 PM
|
#6
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Creston
|
Well if your going to down grade Canada's report card you need to look at America's as well. Minus 45 000 from the 103 000 jobs created. They were only out of a job by collective choice. 45 000 Verizon workers went back to work in September after being on strike.
That leaves 58 000 new jobs created. I also wonder if some of that number like Canada's might represent teachers going back to work.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Calgaryborn For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2011, 07:51 PM
|
#7
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgaryborn
I also wonder if some of that number like Canada's might represent teachers going back to work.
|
???
|
|
|
10-07-2011, 08:00 PM
|
#8
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Creston
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
???
|
Of the 58 000 jobs created in September in America I wonder how many might just represent education positions(teachers, bus drivers, ect.).
|
|
|
10-07-2011, 08:27 PM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
|
Are teachers really considered unemployed during the summer? I doubt it.
__________________
But living an honest life - for that you need the truth. That's the other thing I learned that day, that the truth, however shocking or uncomfortable, leads to liberation and dignity. -Ricky Gervais
|
|
|
10-07-2011, 08:39 PM
|
#10
|
Has lived the dream!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Where I lay my head is home...
|
Teachers are not considered out of work in the summer. They get the same paycheques then that they do during the school year.
|
|
|
10-07-2011, 08:47 PM
|
#11
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Creston
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilers_fan
Are teachers really considered unemployed during the summer? I doubt it.
|
I doubt if full time teacher are if they know they have a job in September but, part time teachers, school bus drivers, some Janitors probably are. I heard once that in B.C. teachers can take all their pay as it is earned or chose to have it paid equally over 12 months.
In any case the States might adjust for those things. I don't know. Fall usually means students going off to school which will open up some lower paid jobs for those who don't.
|
|
|
10-07-2011, 09:20 PM
|
#12
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Supporting Urban Sprawl
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilers_fan
Are teachers really considered unemployed during the summer? I doubt it.
|
I know in my organization, we have a large number of people that work with the public and separate school systems in Calgary. We lay a bunch of them off every June and hire them back in September.
A lot more to schools that just teachers.
__________________
"Wake up, Luigi! The only time plumbers sleep on the job is when we're working by the hour."
|
|
|
10-07-2011, 10:30 PM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: A small painted room
|
What I want to know is how many babies are created in September. So many May babies around. Winter's coming!
Last edited by calumniate; 10-07-2011 at 10:53 PM.
|
|
|
10-07-2011, 10:44 PM
|
#14
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
|
What I want to know is why people pluralize nouns with an apostrophe.
Seriously.
Doesn't this look wrong? Noun's. There are several noun's on this page.
Christ.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Five-hole For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-07-2011, 10:55 PM
|
#15
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: A small painted room
|
Sorry, was bugging me as I typed it.. have had a few. Time to go out and have a few more!
|
|
|
10-07-2011, 11:00 PM
|
#16
|
Basement Chicken Choker
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In a land without pants, or war, or want. But mostly we care about the pants.
|
Winter IS coming = winter's coming.
__________________
Better educated sadness than oblivious joy.
|
|
|
10-07-2011, 11:17 PM
|
#17
|
Franchise Player
|
I've seen various ranges (90,000-150,000/month) that the US has to have every month in jobs growth just to keep pace with population/workforce growth.
Anybody ever see that number pinned down properly?
|
|
|
10-08-2011, 12:23 AM
|
#18
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Otnorot
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calumniate
What I want to know is how many babies are created in September. So many May babies around. Winter's coming!
|
Ewwww, babies and coming. You're gross!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Lobotroth For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-08-2011, 10:58 AM
|
#19
|
Had an idea!
|
Quote:
Alberta continues to churn out jobs at a frenetic pace amid what one analyst described Friday as a period of "blockbuster" employment growth across the country.
The province's unemployment rate dipped to 5.4 per cent in September - from 5.6 per cent in August - following a fifth straight month of job gains, Statistics Canada reported Friday.
The federal agency recorded 8,600 new jobs, bringing to almost 98,000 the number of new jobs created during the past year.
|
Read more: http://www.calgaryherald.com/busines...#ixzz1aD6iwyAy
EDIT: Have to add this.
Quote:
"Private-sector job growth in the province was up a massive 8.8 per cent year-over-year in September, the strongest growth since 1981 and even outpacing growth seen at the height of the energy boom in 2007."
|
|
|
|
10-08-2011, 12:06 PM
|
#20
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chemgear
I've seen various ranges (90,000-150,000/month) that the US has to have every month in jobs growth just to keep pace with population/workforce growth.
Anybody ever see that number pinned down properly?
|
I can't find it now, but in the audio copy of the Economist, the august 22nd or 27th edition, they talked about Augusts jobless rate and how fishy those numbers are.
They then included the underemployed rate and it was an even more staggering figure. Something like a combined 21 percent.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:15 PM.
|
|