Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-12-2011, 01:41 PM   #2321
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnes View Post
Yup.

Section 7. Neither the state, nor any county, city, town, municipality, or other subdivision of the state shall ever give or loan its credit in the aid of, or make any donation or grant, by subsidy or otherwise, to any individual, association, or corporation, or become a subscriber to, or a shareholder in, any company or corporation, or become a joint owner with any person, company, or corporation, except as to such ownerships as may accrue to the state by operation or provision of law or as authorized by law solely for investment of the monies in the various funds of the state.

Maybe one of the lawyers can explain the intention of the bold portion. To me, it reads 'You can't give away money unless, there's a good reason to.' -->Which must be decided by a court, which you are not.
To me it reads that the state can invest in companies it at times ends up owning, I assume this means water or power companies or the like and they can invest in stocks and bonds like any other shareholder.
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2011, 02:06 PM   #2322
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon View Post
To me it reads that the state can invest in companies it at times ends up owning, I assume this means water or power companies or the like and they can invest in stocks and bonds like any other shareholder.
Exactly. Now if the City Of Glendale was using the payments to own the Coyotes instead of just covering debt for a future buyer then the city would have a case. I can't see how using taxpayers money to cover the expenses of a sports team that will be owned by somebody other than the city of Glendale can be legal.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2011, 02:17 PM   #2323
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Then why didn't anyone challenge the last $25 million payment, and why isn't GWI going after the city on the new deal?
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2011, 03:37 PM   #2324
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Nick Dranias, a lawyer for GWI was on Prime Time Sports yesterday and clearly outlined their position on the $25M. Download the 6pm podcast on itunes if you want to hear it. In summary, he stated they are waiting for documents relating to the deal to determine if this years $25M can be classified as a subsidy etc. Apparantly the $25M doesn't have to go into escrow until September and may not have to pay if the team is sold prior. Therefor any legal filing right now could be moot if a deal with a buyer happens before September. They also do not want to take legal action only on the $25M yet as they feel it's only a small piece of the larger picture and want to wait to see how things unfold. If a deal with a buyer starts to be put together they want to evaluate the whole and take all items they have issue with to court at once. If no buyer comes when September hits I imagine they'll raise issue with the $25M.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
Old 05-12-2011, 04:16 PM   #2325
KootenayFlamesFan
Commie Referee
 
KootenayFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Small town, B.C.
Exp:
Default

Please stick to the topic and stop the personal shots. Thanks.
KootenayFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KootenayFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
Old 05-12-2011, 04:50 PM   #2326
longsuffering
First Line Centre
 
longsuffering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Really? Care to explain the reality of situation then? Please enlighten me.
Why bother? I can see you don't see able to absorb anything that anyone who disagrees with you says.

And as I said, I don't have a dog in this fight. I was just making an observation.
longsuffering is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2011, 05:30 PM   #2327
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by longsuffering View Post
Why bother? I can see you don't see able to absorb anything that anyone who disagrees with you says.

And as I said, I don't have a dog in this fight. I was just making an observation.
Thanks for the explanation on the situation,lol. I gave you a chance to clear everything up as you said I was clueless about what was going on. Well done.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 04:16 PM   #2328
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Glendale economic report about Phoenix Coyotes kept private
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articl...s-private.html

Glendale is withholding a key economic report the city commissioned to persuade investors to finance its PhoenixCoyotes deal.

The report was prepared for the city's pitch to investors earlier this year when Glendale sought $116 million in financing from bond buyers. The money was needed to complete a 30-year lease at Jobing.com Arena with team buyer Matthew Hulsizer.

But the TL Hocking & Associates report could shed light on assumptions the City Council relied on to approve the deal with Hulsizer last December. And it could provide insight into how much money Glendale is expected to reap by keeping the hockey team in town.

The Arizona Republic five weeks ago filed a request with Glendale under the state's public-records law for the study.

The city denied the Republic's request three weeks later, saying the report was "protected" and it was "in the city's best interest not to release it."
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 04:29 PM   #2329
afc wimbledon
Franchise Player
 
afc wimbledon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
Glendale economic report about Phoenix Coyotes kept private

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articl...s-private.html

Glendale is withholding a key economic report the city commissioned to persuade investors to finance its PhoenixCoyotes deal.

The report was prepared for the city's pitch to investors earlier this year when Glendale sought $116 million in financing from bond buyers. The money was needed to complete a 30-year lease at Jobing.com Arena with team buyer Matthew Hulsizer.

But the TL Hocking & Associates report could shed light on assumptions the City Council relied on to approve the deal with Hulsizer last December. And it could provide insight into how much money Glendale is expected to reap by keeping the hockey team in town.

The Arizona Republic five weeks ago filed a request with Glendale under the state's public-records law for the study.


The city denied the Republic's request three weeks later, saying the report was "protected" and it was "in the city's best interest not to release it."
Classic! this council really is a sad sack of crap.
afc wimbledon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 04:35 PM   #2330
PegCityFlamesFan
First Line Centre
 
PegCityFlamesFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Exp:
Default

How about, since they want to keep the Coyotes real bad, the have a drive to 13,000 to keep the team in the city. I am sure that'll be just fine.
__________________
PegCityFlamesFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 05:08 PM   #2331
DementedReality
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
Glendale economic report about Phoenix Coyotes kept private

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articl...s-private.html

Glendale is withholding a key economic report the city commissioned to persuade investors to finance its PhoenixCoyotes deal.

The report was prepared for the city's pitch to investors earlier this year when Glendale sought $116 million in financing from bond buyers. The money was needed to complete a 30-year lease at Jobing.com Arena with team buyer Matthew Hulsizer.

But the TL Hocking & Associates report could shed light on assumptions the City Council relied on to approve the deal with Hulsizer last December. And it could provide insight into how much money Glendale is expected to reap by keeping the hockey team in town.

The Arizona Republic five weeks ago filed a request with Glendale under the state's public-records law for the study.


The city denied the Republic's request three weeks later, saying the report was "protected" and it was "in the city's best interest not to release it."
hard not to question whats in the report!!

if i was a tax payer, i would pretty steamed about this but what else is new, the politicians everywhere already know whats best for us citizens.
DementedReality is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 06:22 PM   #2332
MacGruber
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

really, some of these freaking city council members and the mayor need to wind up behind bars. this isn't just corruption, it's bordering on ... well, corruption.. its corruption.
MacGruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2011, 04:28 AM   #2333
Tsawwassen
Franchise Player
 
Tsawwassen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yasa View Post
I just want this to eeeeeennddddd. I don't care the outcome. Just please let it be over.
There is no end in sight. This will keep going and going and going and.......
__________________
Remember this, TSN stands for Toronto's Sports Network!
MOD EDIT: Removed broken image link.
Tsawwassen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2011, 01:52 PM   #2334
Mazrim
CP Gamemaster
 
Mazrim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Gary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PegCityFlamesFan View Post
How about, since they want to keep the Coyotes real bad, the have a drive to 13,000 to keep the team in the city. I am sure that'll be just fine.
They might want to start a little smaller, knowing general attendance there. Maybe 5,000? Driveto5.com should be open to buy for a website, and it has a nice ring to it.
Mazrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2011, 08:31 PM   #2335
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

Season tickets are at 90% renewal with 1000 new sales.
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2011, 08:36 PM   #2336
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouw N Arrow View Post
Season tickets are at 90% renewal with 1000 new sales.
That doesn't mean much without a count of how many tickets a "90% renewal rate" means. That could mean they've got 1,350/1,500 tickets renewed and an extra 1,000 sold.
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
TorqueDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2015, 01:04 PM   #2337
hwy19man
Franchise Player
 
hwy19man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

It is back!!

NHL loses Coyotes bankruptcy decision

"The NHL suffered another setback Wednesday in its seemingly never-ending legal battle over the Arizona Coyotes. U.S. Bankruptcy Court Justice Redfield T. Baum, recommended that the league be denied almost all of its claim of $145-million (all figures U.S.) in damages against former team owner Jerry Moyes. This is the second loss for the NHL in the claim against Moyes. The court ruled against the league in October, 2013."

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/hockey/nhl-loses-arizona-coyotes-bankruptcy-decision/article22571647/

Remember those names? Here we go again.
__________________
----------

must show all Flames games nationally when they play on Saturdays, Mondays, and Wednesdays !!!
hwy19man is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2015, 01:20 PM   #2338
ClubFlames
Posted the 2 millionth post!
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

When I saw hwy19man was the last poster I thought he posted what channel they are showing the sale or bankruptcy of the Coyotes.
__________________

ClubFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ClubFlames For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:33 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy