03-25-2011, 03:04 PM
|
#1
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
|
2011 Federal election polls, demographics, predictions
While the election thread that we have is great, I'm going to start another one with a different focus: discussion about polls, demographics, and predictions.
I'm going to start this off with some helpful links:
Laurier Institute has very good election coverage:
http://www.wlu.ca/lispop/
They do some seat projections using a regional swing model.
Their interactive map is also very well done.
I also like this site from SFU:
http://www.sfu.ca/~aheard/elections/
They've got good polling data, broken down by region. (LISPOP has the same data, but doesn't seem to be updated as regularly)
Another site to keep an eye on is the Election Prediction Project, which attempts to predict results on a seat by seat basis. At this point it's not really useful as it as 75 seats rated too-close to call, but it's good for getting a sense of where the battles are likely to be.
http://www.electionprediction.org/2009_fed/index.php
Wikipedia isn't a bad source for general election info either. I find it a good place to look up riding histories and such:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadia...election,_2011
Post your favorite election data links in this thread.
As well, I'm sure this is going to fall on deaf ears, but:
Please try to keep this thread free of your own opinions on candidates, parties or policies. Or if your argument requires you to state your own opinion, please label it as such. Discussion about how policies or platforms might affect various demographics is welcome, just try to avoid generalizing. I know lots of us have strong political opinions (which is great), but that's not the point of this thread.
Last edited by octothorp; 03-25-2011 at 03:13 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to octothorp For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-25-2011, 03:04 PM
|
#2
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: not lurking
|
First up, the Laurier Institute's projection today of a Conservative majority. Of course, it should be pointed out that this isn't a firm prediction by them, it's just an extrapolation based on the last three polls (by Ipsos, Nanos, and Harris Decima, all conducted over the last two weeks).
http://www.wlu.ca/lispop/seatprojections.html
It assumes a 10 point lead in Ontario. I'm don't think that's an accurate depiction of what the margin is right now. The Harris-Decima (by far the largest of the three) put the lead in Ontario at just 1 point, while the Nasos and Ipsos ones had it at 16% and 12% respectively. This is a massive disparity, and going back over the previous months, Nanos and Ipsos tend to have wider margins in Ontario, while Decima and Ekos (the two with the largest sample sizes) have been much closer.
My question is whether it's an advantage or disadvantage to be in majority territory too early? I think the Tories have to like the numbers they're seeing in the polls right now, but the focus of the debate will likely become whether the country is ready for a Harper majority, and the coalition card becomes more difficult to play (since even a three-party coalition wouldn't be able to form a government, based on these projections). At the same time, it's great for the Tories that they'll have a very fired-up base.
|
|
|
03-25-2011, 03:17 PM
|
#3
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
|
Threehundredeight.blogspot.com is also a strong polling site.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Freeway For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-25-2011, 03:18 PM
|
#4
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
|
My only prediction is I won't be voting, but will be using my 4hrs off to go to the strip club and get wasted.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to HOOT For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-25-2011, 03:20 PM
|
#5
|
Franchise Player
|
My prediction: The government wastes $300 million dollars to obtain the same result: A Convservative minority government
|
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to shermanator For This Useful Post:
|
anyonebutedmonton,
Blaster86,
calgarybornnraised,
Hack&Lube,
HOOT,
Icon,
kdogg,
KPJ,
MarchHare,
TylerSVT,
vennegoor of hesselink
|
03-25-2011, 03:26 PM
|
#6
|
Norm!
|
The Conservatives will game more seats but miss out on a majority.
The Liberal's will bleed seats
The NDP will gain seats on the back of the Liberal's
The Bloc will stay about the same.
The Greens will come out of the election without a seat.
We see at least three party leaders resign after the election.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
03-25-2011, 03:27 PM
|
#7
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
|
If the last 3 elections are any indication the CPAC polling guys is leaps and bounds better than the other guys.
This is the guy they use - I have very closely watched polling for the last 3 elections and he is the only one worth relying on for polling information.
http://www.nikonthenumbers.com/ (Nanos Research)
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
|
|
|
03-25-2011, 03:30 PM
|
#8
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary...Alberta, Canada
|
Thanks for compiling all these reference sites - I enjoy reading all the predictions and seat counts during elections.
__________________
We may curse our bad luck that it's sounds like its; who's sounds like whose; they're sounds like their (and there); and you're sounds like your. But if we are grown-ups who have been through full-time education, we have no excuse for muddling them up.
|
|
|
03-25-2011, 04:02 PM
|
#9
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vancouver
|
Do you have any pictures? I was hoping to see some cool election poll graphs or something. It's Friday, and I'm not drunk, and everyone has gone home, but I have a pile of work to do that I'm kind of procrastinating at, but it has to be done tonight, so I was kind of hoping there would be pictures in this thread, but there's just a bunch of words that I'm not going to read. Man I wish I was drunk.
|
|
|
03-25-2011, 04:13 PM
|
#10
|
Norm!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by worth
Do you have any pictures? I was hoping to see some cool election poll graphs or something. It's Friday, and I'm not drunk, and everyone has gone home, but I have a pile of work to do that I'm kind of procrastinating at, but it has to be done tonight, so I was kind of hoping there would be pictures in this thread, but there's just a bunch of words that I'm not going to read. Man I wish I was drunk.
|
Insert masterbation joke here
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|
|
|
03-25-2011, 04:22 PM
|
#11
|
In the Sin Bin
|
There is actually a specific article on Wikipedia featuring the polling results since 2008:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion...deral_election
It is interesting to see the results over time, as it seems Ipsos Reid and Nanos often show far larger Tory support than Harris-Decima and Ekos do.
|
|
|
03-25-2011, 04:24 PM
|
#12
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Watching the At Issue panel from a short time ago, Allan Gregg from Decima made an interesting point about the diminishing reliability of polls. The response rate from phone interviews is down to 15-20%, so the pollsters are now trying to cobble together different methods of data collection. That makes it very difficult for them to be able to say with any kind of certainty that the polling data they produce is an accurate representation of public opinion.
I'm really interested to see how this election plays out. I'm curious to see if the corruption accusations stick or if the economic good news dominates the minds of voters.
|
|
|
03-25-2011, 05:10 PM
|
#13
|
Franchise Player
|
I will predict a small conservative majority, with the major gains being in Ontario, Liberals and NDP each get a seat in Alberta.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
|
|
|
03-25-2011, 05:17 PM
|
#14
|
In the Sin Bin
|
I would be absolutely shocked if the Liberals take a seat in Alberta. A Tory sweep is more likely.
|
|
|
03-25-2011, 05:22 PM
|
#15
|
Franchise Player
|
I probably agree, but for discussion sake, i think people in the Conservatives' camp are underestimating how ticked off upper-middle class + are in Edmonton over the World Expo bid.
Toss in the morons that will vote for the libs because Ignatieff will give money for the arena and a couple of Edmonton seats are in play.
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
|
|
|
03-25-2011, 05:33 PM
|
#16
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
There is actually a specific article on Wikipedia featuring the polling results since 2008:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion...deral_election
It is interesting to see the results over time, as it seems Ipsos Reid and Nanos often show far larger Tory support than Harris-Decima and Ekos do.
|
Yeah...really noticeable and i wonder why that is? Obviously they are polling different areas or different segments of the population.
IFF is good at explaining thi stuff...maybe he will chime in.
|
|
|
03-25-2011, 05:35 PM
|
#17
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Selection bias, the questions they are asking, how they interpret the answers, probably many things. I should try to find the poll results leading into the 2008 election and see where reality ended up between those two extremes.
|
|
|
03-25-2011, 05:36 PM
|
#18
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Devinder Shory will likely be voted in again for Calgary Northeast solely because he's the conservative candidate. I don't have problems with him just because of the allegations of being a part of a mortgage fraud scheme, it goes deeper with how he was originally elected into the conservative party.
|
|
|
03-25-2011, 06:46 PM
|
#19
|
Franchise Player
|
Why don't we get a poll right and see people's predictions?
Conservative Healthy Majority
Conservative small majority
Conservative minority, form government
Conservative minority, coalition forms government
Liberal Majority
etc
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
|
|
|
03-26-2011, 10:35 AM
|
#20
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Angus Reid has the Conservatives up 39-25 on the Liberals. NDP at 19, Bloc 10 and Overrateds 7.
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/p...lls-may-2?bn=1
Also of note from that story:
Quote:
Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff’s approval rating sits at 19 per cent — about the same as Bloc Leader Gilles Duceppe on a national basis. That is barely half the 37 per cent approval rating garnered by both Harper and NDP Leader Jack Layton.
But the survey also shows only 26 per cent of voters want to see the Conservative party win a majority after five years.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:14 AM.
|
|