03-08-2011, 11:49 AM
|
#161
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CP House of Ill Repute
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon
Oh I aint saying it would happen, just that roads and the like are a small problem if someone wants to shovle enough cash at it.
|
If they want to shovel enough cash at it, they'll build a new rink on a site that has enough room for an NHL sized rink.
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 11:51 AM
|
#162
|
CP Gamemaster
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Gary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
Easily. The "Winnipeg compares to Nashville/Columbus" argument assumes Winnipeg is selling out every game, where Nashville and Columbus obviously are not. This is actually an argument that has consistently been made from day one: Winnipeg's top end is no better than existing mediocrity.
|
You're assuming that the revenue report is using a sell-out situation. That's not realistic at all. You'd have to think they're expecting not all nights to sell out over the long term.
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 11:56 AM
|
#163
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CP House of Ill Repute
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazrim
You're assuming that the revenue report is using a sell-out situation. That's not realistic at all. You'd have to think they're expecting not all nights to sell out over the long term.
|
That's not what all the kool aid drinking Jets fans are claiming. Sure sellouts!!! Every night!! Only the cheap seats are missing in the undersized rink!!
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 12:00 PM
|
#164
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northendzone
i remember the good old days when guys like george gillete bought hockey teams with thier own money and a big public bond offering was not needed......
i think brunt nailed it yesterday when he said that he thought the nhl likely wishes it would have been able to strike a deal with jimmy b who was willing to overpay for the team with cash and provide the COG with a parting gift.......
|
Nonsensical argument.
he wanted to move the club without paying any territorial rights and without going through the proper process...why has that changed?
He buys the team...he stays in Phoenix, and that was something he was unwilling to do.
Does he have an agreement with MTS? Because no matter what he is not going to get Hamilton at this point.
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 12:20 PM
|
#165
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
|
What Matthew Hulsizer was quoted as saying: "We have everything we need to close..."
The part that was cut off of his quote: "... except what we need to close."
__________________
-James
GO FLAMES GO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
Typical dumb take.
|
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 12:23 PM
|
#166
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenTeaFrapp
If they want to shovel enough cash at it, they'll build a new rink on a site that has enough room for an NHL sized rink.
|
You would think that, of course I am watching a piece of crap stadium in Vancouver getting a barely functionable new roof for damn near the price of a new stadium so who can say!
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 12:42 PM
|
#167
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazrim
You're assuming that the revenue report is using a sell-out situation. That's not realistic at all. You'd have to think they're expecting not all nights to sell out over the long term.
|
Yes I, and everyone else on both sides of the debate, have been making such an assumption. However, given Columbus averaged a bit over 15k last year (down to 13.8k this), while Nashville is averaging 15k this year (up from around 14 last), assuming that Winnipeg is comparable at the same attendance is reasonable. The difference is that Winnipeg at 15k is the top end, no room for growth, while every other market in the NHL can grow from 15k.
Keep in mind that both Columbus and Nashville are revenue sharing recipients, and if Winnipeg is said to be comparable, would also be a revenue sharing collector. In order to fully qualify, Winnipeg would have to sell out, or start losing their share.
All of these arguments assume complete sellouts for a reason.
Last edited by Resolute 14; 03-08-2011 at 12:45 PM.
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 12:44 PM
|
#168
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
Nonsensical argument.
he wanted to move the club without paying any territorial rights and without going through the proper process...why has that changed?
He buys the team...he stays in Phoenix, and that was something he was unwilling to do.
Does he have an agreement with MTS? Because no matter what he is not going to get Hamilton at this point.
|
Add in his behaviour on the Predators sale, and I would suggest Brunt is doing some serious drugs if he thinks the league is having second thoughts on Balsillie.
Don't get me wrong though. I would love to see him owning a team in Hamilton. His war with the Maple Leafs would make for great entertainment!
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 12:46 PM
|
#169
|
CP Gamemaster
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Gary
|
Sure, that's fine. The point is that Winnipeg getting 85% attendance is still better than Atlanta at 40%, regardless of the ability to grow. If the Thompson group is okay with having a revenue ceiling, then why would NHL say no to it? If Columbus continues to miss the playoffs, I imagine their average will not go up much either.
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 12:57 PM
|
#170
|
In the Sin Bin
|
And Atlanta at 85% is better than Winnipeg at 40%. See what I did there?
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 01:20 PM
|
#171
|
First Line Centre
|
The problem there is that Atlanta has/is/never will be at 80%.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to PegCityFlamesFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-08-2011, 01:23 PM
|
#172
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazrim
You're assuming that the revenue report is using a sell-out situation. That's not realistic at all. You'd have to think they're expecting not all nights to sell out over the long term.
|
If the Jets average ticket price is $60 chances are they will sell out.
15,000 * 60 = 900,000 game
San Jose at $43 and a state of the art arena seating 17,750 and one of the winningest team in a decade max revenue per game: 763,000 game
So basically Winnipeg can have an average ticket price of $50 and have the same revenue as best San Jose can do.
Average ticket prices Jan 2010 from forbes
Columbus - 51
Carolina - 38
NYI - 51
Nashville - 48
TB 36
Atlanta 46
Phoenix 37
St. L 44
Florida 49
Buffalo 36
anahiem 44
San Jose 43
Washington 45
Colorado 60
Minnesota 61
LA 47
NJD 48
Dallas 50
Pittsburgh 56
Edmonton 60
Ottawa 56
Calgary 60
Vancouver 65
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 01:39 PM
|
#173
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary in Heart, Ottawa in Body
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
If the Jets average ticket price is $60 chances are they will sell out.
Average ticket prices Jan 2010 from forbes
Washington 45
|
Sorry, I know you're quoting an article from Forbes magazine, but I have to call BS on this number.
I've been living in The District for over a year and a half now and I have never seen a special or even offer for a caps ticket for less than 65 dollars. Have a quick look at Ticketmaster and the lowest ticket is $63 dollars straight up.
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 02:03 PM
|
#174
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: east van
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by c.t.ner
Sorry, I know you're quoting an article from Forbes magazine, but I have to call BS on this number.
I've been living in The District for over a year and a half now and I have never seen a special or even offer for a caps ticket for less than 65 dollars. Have a quick look at Ticketmaster and the lowest ticket is $63 dollars straight up.
|
I would guess the 45 is a season ticket price?
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 02:06 PM
|
#175
|
Jordan!
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
|
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/n...n.html?ana=twt
According to sources close to the inner-workings of the deal, the new Coyotes sale plan could entail:
• Reducing the amount of City of Glendale bonds for Hulsizer and the Coyotes from $100 million down to $70 million.
• Having the National Hockey League discount its estimated $170 million asking price for the team, plus this year’s $25 million to $30 million in losses it wants covered by Glendale or Hulsizer.
• Asking Hulsizer to contribute more than the current estimated $70 million he is putting into the transaction.
• Possibly leveraging $25 million Glendale previously allocated to help cover the Coyotes losses this season.
• Hoping the reduced bonds amount and financial changes lessen legal opposition to the deal from the Goldwater Institute watchdog group.
Read more: Last-ditch Coyotes deal could be in the works | Phoenix Business Journal
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 02:07 PM
|
#176
|
In the Sin Bin
|
IIRC, those average ticket prices don't include luxury suites either.
Average ticket price =/= revenue generated per seat. As noted, season ticket holders pay less, and there are always tickets given away, even if just a couple hundred per game.
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 02:20 PM
|
#177
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bouw N Arrow
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/n...n.html?ana=twt
According to sources close to the inner-workings of the deal, the new Coyotes sale plan could entail:
Reducing the amount of City of Glendale bonds for Hulsizer and the Coyotes from $100 million down to $70 million.
Having the National Hockey League discount its estimated $170 million asking price for the team, plus this years $25 million to $30 million in losses it wants covered by Glendale or Hulsizer.
Asking Hulsizer to contribute more than the current estimated $70 million he is putting into the transaction.
Possibly leveraging $25 million Glendale previously allocated to help cover the Coyotes losses this season.
Hoping the reduced bonds amount and financial changes lessen legal opposition to the deal from the Goldwater Institute watchdog group.
Read more: Last-ditch Coyotes deal could be in the works | Phoenix Business Journal
|
Just about everyone with a connection to the NHL who has commented on Twitter is calling bullcrap. The general opinion is "The NHL is going to eat some losses here? LOL"
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 02:25 PM
|
#178
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary in Heart, Ottawa in Body
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
IIRC, those average ticket prices don't include luxury suites either.
Average ticket price =/= revenue generated per seat. As noted, season ticket holders pay less, and there are always tickets given away, even if just a couple hundred per game.
|
Interesting. I'd still gander to say that is a very low value for Washington and for San Jose (and other markets) - even with factoring in Season Ticket holder price values and free tickets. The information also points to January 2010, so I doubt that those ticket values are from the 2009-10 season and are probably based on the 2008-09 season.
Personally, I don't see these values as a good metric to forecast the success of the Jets in the near future. If as the OP suggested the average ticket price in Winnipeg is 60 dollars, than the average walk up face value for a ticket to a Jets game would have to be closer to 75-80 dollars. (With the basis that Walk-up ticket sales have a higher face value). That's an expensive proposition for a single game for such a small population base.
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 02:42 PM
|
#179
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Glendale Teabaggers getting involved:
NHL top brass in town, while Glendale Tea Party plans Coyotes protest
http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blo...insider/121332
UPDATE: Fox Sports Arizona producer Graham Taylor reports Bettman will be interviewed tonight during the first intermission of the Coyotes vs. Vancouver Canucks game to update fans and viewers on the saga in Glendale.
Meanwhile, the Glendale Tea Party Patriots are planning to protest Glendale's deal with Coyotes buyer Matthew Hulsizer outside a community meeting Mayor Elaine Scruggs has called next week.
In a letter to the mayor, McHugh called the deal "risks in which we do not want to participate."
"Please be aware that many of our members are educated professionals, and very intellectual and knowledgeable (we've done our homework)".
Last edited by troutman; 03-08-2011 at 02:47 PM.
|
|
|
03-08-2011, 02:47 PM
|
#180
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Intellectual and knowledgeable are two words that I would never use to describe a tea bagger.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 PM.
|
|