Girl Attacked in Calgary Schoolyard or Kids will be Kids?

[Cecil Terwilliger]

Originally Posted by robocop

no, that is not what I was insinuating

Ok so if it is her fault (at least partially) and her brothers and fathers shouldn't be angry what are you saying exactly?

That her brothers and father weren't very good role models because they didn't teach her not to get ####faced and have sex in public?

I'm not sure you have to have a sister to know that or if it even applies. I know lots of people with good family role models who have done stupid or slutty things. Or stupid slutty things.

[robocop]

^still nope, phew you read a lot into nothing

[puckluck]

Pretty sure robocop was saying that killing the offender or causing serious injury to the offender is the only option.

[jayswin]

Originally Posted by robocop

^still nope, phew you read a lot into nothing

Yeah but did you read the whole story, including the update?

[Cecil Terwilliger]

Originally Posted by puckluck

Pretty sure robocop was saying that killing the offender or causing serious injury to the offender is the only option.

Well, he already said he doesn't think the father or brothers should be angry so at this point I have absolutely no idea what he's trying to say.

Things I've said that he's already shot down as being what he meant:

Anger from father brother
better parenting/brothering either thru mentoring or direct intervention
she is devoid of responsibility

So if it is none of these then what is it?

Shame? Violence? That seems weird if he doesn't even think they should be angry.

[puckluck]

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

Well, he already said he doesn't think the father or brothers should be angry so at this point I have absolutely no idea what he's trying to say.

Where did he say this? if that's the case than I don't have a clue what he meant. But that would be my first reaction.

[Boblobla]

Looks like I need to sign up for Nexopia.

[Sliver]

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

Ok so if it is her fault (at least partially) and her brothers and fathers shouldn't be angry what are you saying exactly?

That her brothers and father weren't very good role models because they didn't teach her not to get ####faced and have sex in public?

I'm not sure you have to have a sister to know that or if it even applies. I know lots of people with good family role models who have done stupid or slutty things. Or stupid slutty things.

Pics? Phone numbers?

[HeartsOfFire]

Originally Posted by Boblobla

Looks like I need to sign up for Nexopia.

Once again, you do your avatar justice.

[ZedMan]

... got on top and had protected ...

Well, good news is sex ed. appears to be working.

[Cecil Terwilliger]

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

Or that her brothers or father should be angry?

Originally Posted by robocop

no, that is not what I was insinuating

Originally Posted by puckluck

Where did he say this? if that's the case than I don't have a clue what he meant. But that would be my first reaction.

I'm not sure either but I'm thinking he meant violence and then backed off when he realized it wouldn't be received well.

[jayswin]

Originally Posted by robocop

Anyone with younger sisters or a daughter knows only one reaction to a story like this.

I'm still waiting to hear what the "only reaction" is to someone's younger sister or daughter getting loaded drunk, taking her pajama bottoms off and begging a guy to have sex with her?

[Cecil Terwilliger]

Originally Posted by flameswin

I'm still waiting to hear what the "only reaction" is to someone's younger sister or daughter getting loaded drunk, taking her pajama bottoms off and begging a guy to have sex with her?

Dude, I finally got it.

The reaction is "why do we have to be related? I'm missing out on an easy opportunity to get laid here!"