02-07-2011, 04:59 PM
|
#261
|
|
CP Gamemaster
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Gary
|
Yeah it's all posturing. It's nonsense really.
|
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:00 PM
|
#262
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Whats wrong with going in camera with administration?
Can't get the feed right now, but is the airport board still causing issues?
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:00 PM
|
#263
|
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Going in camera.
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:01 PM
|
#264
|
|
CP Gamemaster
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Gary
|
Predictable who are against in-camera...lol.
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:01 PM
|
#265
|
|
Franchise Player
|
So, it passed?
(I can't believe I'm watching a Calgary City Council webcast)
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Madman For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:02 PM
|
#266
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cap Hell
|
New to watching city council. What is this in camera stuff all about ?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3 Justin 3
All I saw was Godzilla.  |
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Art Vandelay For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:02 PM
|
#267
|
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameOn
Whats wrong with going in camera with administration?
Can't get the feed right now, but is the airport board still causing issues?
|
Basically the argument is that there's a lot of risk and therefore the public needs to know. Silly, because what the admnistration wanted to go in camera for is a report that may affect negociating strategy. Of course, that should be in camera.
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:03 PM
|
#268
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Madman
So, it passed?
(I can't believe I'm watching a Calgary City Council webcast)
|
Only the motion to go in-camera. Not the tunnel project as a whole.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to frinkprof For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:05 PM
|
#269
|
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Vandelay
New to watching city council. What is this in camera stuff all about?
|
Basically going off the record... discussion has moved out of council chambers and into a private boardroom. Motion to go in camera passed.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SebC For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:05 PM
|
#270
|
|
CP Gamemaster
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Gary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameOn
Can't get the feed right now, but is the airport board still causing issues?
|
I don't think the Airport Authority is causing problems, they're just being careful since this is obviously pretty short notice for a major change and they don't want to lose money or run into problems during construction, and it's on their land so they have some say.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mazrim For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:07 PM
|
#271
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
Chabot, DCU, Mar, Lowe raising a stink about going in camera with administration. A lot posturing IMO.
|
Wow, this is the first time ever actually viewing a webcast. Is this seriously what they argue about? I wanted to strangle that one dude witht he glasses, don't know his name. The bald guy in the beginning causing the stink and being all smarmy about it.
|
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:08 PM
|
#272
|
|
Voted for Kodos
|
They will discuss in camera for only the incamera items. The main discussion on the tunnel will be back out in the public.
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:11 PM
|
#273
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Yen Man
Wow, this is the first time ever actually viewing a webcast. Is this seriously what they argue about? I wanted to strangle that one dude witht he glasses, don't know his name. The bald guy in the beginning causing the stink and being all smarmy about it.
|
That's Chabot. He is an idiot. If you live in Ward 10, please run against him in the next election.
This probably won't be decided before they break for dinner around 6PM.
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:11 PM
|
#274
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Why does going "in camera" mean they're off camera? Stupid English/Latin language.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:11 PM
|
#275
|
|
CP Gamemaster
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Gary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed
They will discuss in camera for only the incamera items. The main discussion on the tunnel will be back out in the public.
|
I imagine the term is confusing for many since they're obviously OUT of the view of the camera right now. Silly council terminology.
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 05:17 PM
|
#276
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cap Hell
|
Stuff I learned today:
In camera (Latin: "in a chamber")[1] is a legal term meaning "in private".[1] It is also sometimes termed in chambers or in curia.
From Wikipedia
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3 Justin 3
All I saw was Godzilla. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Art Vandelay For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 06:15 PM
|
#277
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Council is taking dinner, then going back in-camera at 19:00. Decision will be some time, if it even comes tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 08:53 PM
|
#278
|
|
CP Gamemaster
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Gary
|
I think they were just talking about tolling? Weird.
EDIT: Also talking about downgrading Metis Trail from Expressway to Arterial roadway. Interesting.
Last edited by Mazrim; 02-07-2011 at 08:56 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 09:02 PM
|
#279
|
|
First Line Centre
|
^Yeah there was an amendment put forth by Ald. Farrell to have Administration report back exploring alternative funding methods including a levy, other levels of government and tolls. So if both the amendment and the motion pass, we won't know about things like tolls until later on.
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2011, 09:08 PM
|
#280
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Oh, and the downgrading of Metis Trail is proposed as an amendment to the Airport Tunnel notice of motion, but it sounds like the appetite is to revisit that later as its own notice of motion.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:20 AM.
|
|
